두뇌 재구성하기: 인지 에뮬레이션과 신경 경로

### 두뇌 재구성하기: 개인적 성장을 위한 인지 에뮬레이션과 신경 경로
* 🧠 개인적인 목표를 달성하려면 **인지 브리지라고도 하는 신경 경로 생성을 통해 뇌를 재구성하는 개념**을 이해해야 합니다.
* 🔗 인지 에뮬레이션은 이러한 다리를 구축하여 개인이 **다양한 인지 기능을 통합**하고 정신 능력을 향상시킬 수 있도록 하는 과정입니다.
* 🌱 뇌를 재구성하는 궁극적인 목표는 **통합과 깨달음의 상태**에 도달하여 자신의 최고의 버전이 되는 것입니다.
* 📊 2021년 말에는 성격 퀴즈를 통해 수집된 데이터를 바탕으로 **성별, 출생 순서와 같은 요소**를 기반으로 예측이 가능해져 인간 행동에 대한 이해를 높이는 데 기여할 것으로 예상됩니다.
* 🔍 성격 퀴즈의 정확도는 개인이 시험에 대한 교육을 얼마나 잘 받았는지에 따라 **80~100% 정도**로 추정됩니다.
* 💡 인지 에뮬레이션 과정에는 자기 훈련을 통해 다양한 인지 기능 간의 접점을 만들어 **개인적인 관계와 도덕적 딜레마를 탐색하는 능력**를 향상시키는 것이 포함됩니다.
* 📈 목표는 **성격 유형의 과학적 근거를 입증할 수 있는 실질적인 데이터**를 수집하여 잠재적으로 문화적 르네상스와 사회적 가치에 대한 재평가를 이끌어내는 것입니다.
* 🤝 궁극적으로 이 컨퍼런스는 개인의 성장과 사회 변화를 촉진하기 위한 인지 경로를 구축하여 **인간 상호 작용을 이해하고 개선하기 위한 프레임워크**를 만드는 것이 중요하다는 점을 강조합니다.

### 인지적 재배선 이해하기: 신경 경로와 개인적 성장
* 🧠 이 토론은 **뇌를 재배선한다는 개념**을 중심으로 진행되며, 이 과정이 자연스럽고 개인 개발에 필수적인 과정임을 강조합니다.
* 🔄 다양한 인지 기능을 습득하는 데 필수적인 새로운 신경 경로를 만드는 데 있어 **인지 에뮬레이션의 중요성**을 강조합니다.
* 💡 연사는 다양한 성격 유형, 특히 **NTP가 관심 기반 인식이 부족**하여 자신도 모르게 손해를 볼 수 있는 상황에 처할 수 있는 방법에 대한 인사이트를 공유합니다.
* 🛣 도로와 고속도로의 비유는 인지 기능이 어떻게 개발되고 업그레이드될 수 있는지 설명하며, **새로운 경로를 구축할 때 뇌의 성장 잠재력**을 보여줍니다.
* 📊 통계 분석에 따르면 **성격 테스트의 정확도는 약 20%**로, 결과 해석에 주의가 필요한 것으로 나타났습니다.
* 📈 연사는 특히 NTP의 경우 **자신의 강점과 약점을 이해하는 것의 중요성**과 인지적 성장을 촉진하는 데 있어 **관계 육성의 역할**에 대해 강조합니다.
* 🔍 스도쿠를 통해 뇌동맥류를 치료하고 뇌를 다시 연결한 한 사람의 이야기는 **회복과 자기 계발에 있어 인지적 참여의 힘**을 증명하는 사례입니다.
* 🌍 이 주제는 개인과 커뮤니티가 서로를 이해하고 안내하는 데 협력할 때 **지식과 자기 인식의 광범위한 르네상스**에 기여할 수 있다는 것을 시사합니다.

인지 에뮬레이션을 통해 뇌를 재구성하면 새로운 신경 경로가 생성되어 통합과 깨달음으로 이어집니다.

Okay, so welcome to the January 2020 Ruby conference. The conference is basically like a live lecture almost, where I'll talk about a topic of some kind that's usually on The Cutting Edge, not really shared with the rest of the audience at all. Then we just have a discussion about it, or we just discuss whatever you want at the end. The discussion period is probably about half an hour, sometimes it's an hour, so these can go up to like two hours. The first 45 minutes to an hour is the actual lecture, so just kind of making you guys aware of just kind of how it's working and whatnot. Got another person that came in. If you guys are coming in, just put something like in the chat and saying if when it comes time you're allowed to talk, but if you don't have the ability to talk, that's okay. I'll make sure that when the Q&A session starts that we'll be able to do that.

Q&A session, please kind of keep it like the live lectures specific to what I talk about in this particular thing. But after that, then we'll just open up to just whatever, even I don't know, shooting the like. It's not that big of a deal. So, but so yeah, Ruby conference, January 2020, happy 2020 guys, we made it, pretty awesome. Alright, so we're going to be talking about basically two things. I know that this is basically known as how to rewire your brain, and a lot of people don't understand that when you're rewiring your brain, this is actually something people naturally do. But what you don't understand is that it has a lot to do, like we're talking about rewiring, what is like, how, what does that affect exactly when we're talking about, you know, four size, the Mind Theory, and, you know, Jungian analytical psychology, and the like, you know.

and we're g this kind of gets in a little bit into uh Dario nar's work. So, if you haven't read Neuroscience personality, get the book. This is actually directly applicable to this uh this conference uh lecture um and um you get that I think you can find it at Cs joseph. lightreading and I think you get like a free audible audio book if you sign up if you're not an audible user already and you do it there um but anyway uh how to rewire your brain. If you if you read diar's work uh you start to understand like yes there is a neuroscience to personality and yes there is a system. It's really cool that he discovered a system. Again, my only issue with DAR nar's work is his inputs um meaning the data that he uses. You can't just hand somebody an mbti test and then they know their type especially when we've proven internally here that right now the accuracy rating for um and and with a 2% margin of error uh plus or

minus uh I'm basically just calling it. There's a one out of one in five chance that the MBTI test is accurate, and that's a problem. So, it's about a 20% chance that we're seeing now, uh, and that's combining all of the coaching clients that I've verified in 2019, as well as another one of my protes, uh, their coaching clients that they have in doing the verification process, and I was directly involved in that, uh, uh, verification process as well. And we probably did about 40 plus people, uh, just in their, uh, their group and their niche, which is basically a business marketing niche anyway. And the statistics so far, it looks like it's been consistently one out of five. At first, it was one out of four, one out of three and a half, and then all of a sudden, it just got to like one out of five, and it's been consistently one out of five now for about six months. So, I think it's pretty safe to say that I can like claim that it's one out of five in

terms of MBTI test accuracy. I will be releasing some statistics about that. So, like, so for example, um, when our personality first personality quiz goes live, um, I'm hoping to get a point where as people take the test, um, and it's going to take, it's going to, it's going to ask people, uh, their gender, um, their age, uh, it's going to ask them a lot of different demographic-related questions, and we're going to have like this pie chart. My goal is to have this pie chart, uh, with all these different analytics that are posted that will be updated in real time as any user around the world, 24 hours a day, in real time, takes the test. It will be published to this page. I'm really hoping to do that. That way, we could actually see the statistics coming in raw, and then we can actually run reports against that information, and, uh, it will definitely create some amazing, uh, written content and some, uh, scientific knowledge, and where we can actually get to a point

where we could scientifically prove, algorithmically speaking, that this form, that this y analytical psychology, is actually a hard science. We're getting closer, I think. The reason why people have had a hard time proving that it's a hard science is because they're just using regular plain mathematics of, you know, X plus X equals, or X plus Y equals Z, you know, or just, you know, these very basic variables of plus or of addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, right? That's a problem. Like, okay, the thing is, is that the brain is an extremely complex system. And if I was to utilize an object in the physical realm, a concrete object that could actually, you know, show you how you need to be approaching the brain or the mind scientifically speaking, it's an abacus. You actually have to be using calculus to calculate someone's psyche and how it behaves. Of course, you know, that's going to be, you know, using calculus-based algorithms and derivatives is really going to be how we're going to

develop sentient AI to begin with um, but once you get to that standpoint, like once you actually know that there's potentially unlimited vectors that you could do to a certain uh quasi-dimensional Abacus, uh, you have to identify how many possible vectors there are. You also have to identify the dimensions, but I don't think it's necessary to identify the dimensions anymore when you're looking at a um, when you're looking at the type grid. The type grid itself basically is a cube, and then you do an abacus, an AB a cubed Abacus basically. And then if you could think of all the possible potential vectors per piece within that Abacus, you could actually develop a pattern and algorithm that allows you to measure the brain and measure the Mind, especially from a neuroscience uh point of view um. And I think that directly correlates and fits in directly with Dario's work. I would love to have the opportunity to work with him directly to prove this um. So my hypothesis is this abacus basically. I've already proved it.

Practically speaking, I know it's true. TI parot, like we test it, it is true. We have proof of concept. The thing is, we just don't have the data to get the users out there to believe it. That's the difference. Um, so what we're hoping is going to happen is that when we deploy the personality quiz, we're going to be getting this data and these analytics and producing them in real time so people can actually see how it works. And that, and uh, and actually can get a true spread where it's our audience that are doing it. Now remember, the numbers that we get will be skewed. How and why? Let me explain. Think about it this way: when you go to season 3 on like the season 3 playlist uh on uh the Youtube channel, look at which videos have more views than the others. So you have to consider uh interest bias. Interest bias means uh when what which of the 16 types are more interested in learning about four sides.

of the Mind Theory compared to others. So statistically, the ESFJ is the one who's just the least interested. They just don't care. Statistically, the most interested is um, uh, well, at least in my audience, audience, it's INTPs. Somebody else's audience, it's not other people's audiences, it's INFJs or INFPs. But you can actually be pretty safe to say that it's the uh, the bottom right-hand side of the type grid, the inverted intuitive, the INXX uh types. So naturally, I expect that interest bias to you know, transfer directly over when we deploy the personality quiz to get those analytics because the people who are the most likely to take that test are going to be INXX types, statistically speaking. So there will be that bias there. Now, if we can get to a point where you know, Chase becomes the world's dictator and is able to uh, compulsory force every human being, mankind, to take the test, then at that point uh, we definitely know for sure. So it doesn't

matter at the end of the day. You have to realize I can't just for every human being to take the personality quiz to get all the results that we need. Now, of course, by now you're thinking, Okay, wow, Chase, do you really think your personality quiz is going to be that accurate? To my knowledge, I think I can guarantee eight out of 10 accuracy with it. Um, but I actually believe, logically speaking, it is 10 out of 10 accurate. It just depends on how well you can educate the person during the test on how to take the test. And we've developed a quick educational way and simplification where we've reduced the test into logical questions. So, there's very few questions, and it's just, you're either this or you're this. It's literally just a choice between you're an apple or you're an orange. That's it. And you do that multiple times, and then sometimes there's apples missing, sometimes there's oranges missing, and then you come out and it's like, Okay, yeah, I'm an orange.

okay, yeah, I'm an apple, you know what I mean, but I am a honey crisp apple. You see what I'm saying? Like, it's that's how it's going to be approached. But again, there is a bias based on the preferences of human beings because certain psyches out there are interested in the science, and a lot of psyches out there like ESFJs, and ISTPs, who are in general just don't care. They don't care, doesn't apply to them, they don't see the benefit. And I mean, you could argue ISFJs as well, but I have noticed ISFJs are a little bit more interested than ESFJs because the least engaging types that we have right now within the audience in total are ISTPs, ESFJs, ISFJs, and ISTJs. So, it's kind of interesting that it's those types, but okay, fair enough. ESFPs are cool, they like it. ESTPs are cool, they like it. Unless they're Flow State, then you have

uh even is FPS like it, but I guess that would make sense because they're my golden Quadra, right? They'd be willing to accept that information coming from an ENTP. Fair enough, but uh, the bottom line is that you have to realize that when we're producing these statistics in real time, it's going to be skewed. However, the second generation, no, the third gener, excuse me, the third generation of the application or the personality quiz itself, not second generation, and I'm only talking about first generation now when it comes to updating things. U, but when it gets to third generation, version three, version three won't even be about psychoanalysis or psychology anymore. It'll be completely different. In fact, psychology will take a back burner seat, and it won't really matter anymore. We found a way to actually provide direct benefits to people's lives that even talking about psychology at all, where they don't even have to care, Oh, the TID, I don't care, because the system will do everything for them. It doesn't matter, so they won't actually have to understand.

what it is they're using. They just know it works, right? When we get to that point, at that moment, all the 16 types will be interested in using the system, and they will be psychoanalyzed by the system with that 10 out of 10 accuracy that we're going for. And when that happens, at that point, and it's really going to be third generation, that we're actually going to have a large enough sample size worldwide, worldwide, to be able to run these reports. And we could definitively prove, based on the data that we have, that yes, it is actually a hard science. And that's just all it is. I already know it's a hard science. Maybe some of you here think it's a hard science. Maybe some of you here don't think it is. The bottom line is I will prove it's a hard science before I die. I guarantee you, like, it will happen. It's self-evident. It's a fundamental. The difference is that we just don't have the data because no one is in a

position to collect the data we can as a company is getting to a point where we are going to be in a position to start collecting that data this year. I would suspect that by the end of 2021, we will be when we have version three out and we are getting our first reports and getting some real answers. We'll even be able to take this data and even potentially predict based on gender, birth order, as well as the month, day, or year which of the 365 days someone is born. And think of all the reports you can run against astrology too, you know what I mean? Think of all the reports you can run against cards of Life, cardsoflife.com. Check that out, that's some, that's funny. I'm a five of Spades according to their personality, and it's still astrology. But think about all of the answers that we're going to be able to provide the human race over the next two to three years. These kinds of answers are going to be so fundamental with how we approach

human life that literally everything will start changing overnight. It'll be rapid change. Laws, entire laws are going to change, or at least there's going to be pressure from public opinion to get laws changed because people are going to start to realize that the human brain is nothing more than a computer, and you can hack it. And here's how. You just have to identify what kind of computer it is. That's all. You know what I mean? So we're in a very exciting time. It could also be very scary, as we've talked about plenty of times here within this community for sure. But this still is something that we have to be aware of. But if you guys stick with me, um, we're definitely going to be having a different um, a different approach over the next um, over the next three years. Remember csj as a company, it exists only as a fundraiser to raise money for building this system, a complete total social media uh, application that is helping people and changing people's lives, saving marriages, the works on a regular basis every day. That's what people are getting. Get out.

of it understanding themselves, understanding of others, but at the same time, we're collecting data and all these users that they opt in to give us because they're using our platform to use their platform. We get their data, that's just the rule, get over it. And we're going to be running some serious reports against this data and publishing psychology journals based on data we're collecting and based on that. It will become so, we will have solid concrete proof. As soon as that happens, everything will start to change. And I have a feeling it's going to create a Great Awakening for our race and every aspect of culture, including our traditions. Everything will be up for grabs. It will be a new Renaissance, a new Great Awakening. Not just, it's not just creating a multi-billion dollar industry. I don't care about the money. It's going to obliterate fatherlessness and we'll be one step closer to having cultures around the earth realizing that they need to reevaluate who they are and why their

culture is the way it is and why they have their Traditions. It will basically reset the collective unconscious of our Race Across the planet, and it may even change our priorities for the better. I would say it would likely because when everyone is able to understand each other, they're able to love each other. Now, obviously, when everyone is able to understand each other, they also have a higher attack surface. Everyone has a higher attack surface, and people could be attacked and manipulated far more easily. But the thing is, is if they know themselves really well, they can recognize those attacks, and things can change. So stick with me because we're going to be a part of this Renaissance, and we're going to be creating this Renaissance, this Great Awakening together. And as long as we don't give up, this community will be the driving force of that Renaissance. If we don't want the result of that Renaissance to be evil, to be death basically, then I think it's best if we as a community stick together and make sure we're the ones guiding Humanity in

that direction that way we don't have that issue. So, but that's just a good expert intuition hero of what the future is going to look like. And it all comes down to seriously considering Dario Nardi's work and then combine Dario Nardi's work with my work, and then we could start getting ourselves some answers even as early as this year. But it really comes down to understanding how to rewire your brain because rewiring your brain. I know I talk like in Seas, like in Season 19, you know about, Okay, yeah, uh, you need to develop your personal responsibility and your humility and your wisdom so you can gain Mastery and your super ego, and that's your path to Enlightenment. Absolutely, but that's a nice overall picture, and it gives you some things, but how about we actually talk about what is actually mechanically happening in your brains, in your mind to actually get to that point, and that's what we're talking about today. And now everyone's like, Oh crap, that was a nice uh 30-minute

introduction okay fine sue me but it's a conference I'm just going loose here it's all good so how to rewire your brain when you are trying to achieve something you have to what what are rewiring your brains what are those wires in your brains and and you know creating neural Pathways what are those neuro pathways are also known as New dictionary term cognitive Bridges you're just bridge building that's all it is why would you care about cognitive Bridges what does that lead to it leads to cognitive emulation right as a result or actually more accurately cognitive emulation is actually how you build the bridges so calling emulation is building the bridges if the goal is you know hey I need to rewire my brain to get it better on why I mean why would you bother doing it why why why rewire your brain what's the goal here goal will be green it'll be um you know let's just say integration or uh with the four sides of Mind Enlightenment being the best version of

yourself wow it helps if I actually know spell properly. Enlightenment right that's what you really want right. How do you get there so yeah we' talked about season 19 content that's great but really like what's actually happening from a neuroscience stand. What's happening neurologically you're really actually building neural pathways. Did you guys know that neural pathways are like um they're like freeways. Oops they're freeways multi-lane freeways for your um neurons for your neurons to move on. The problem is is that your brain might not have enough freeways or it might not carry to build the bridge. So how do you get those bridges built. Well you have to learn how to do cognitive emulation. So let's look at it this way emulation which leads to bridges or those neurop pathways. Okay so emulation to bridges to neural pathways right um and then that basically you have your brain rewired at that point completely rewired such that you end up achieving integration. Enlightenment yeah that sounds very NE.

General, I get it. It's like, okay Chase, where's the beef? Give me some actual practical applications of this. I will do so right now. Give you practical application. We're going to use my brain. We're going to use my brain right now. I'll show you guys some examples directly from my head on this one. So four sides the mind right. We're going to put Chase right here okay. And then we're going to do NE hero TI parent oh I'm GNA probably smack BB in this one poor guy love you bb you got us closer to the truth God bless you. Alright so I am an aoral person. I'll admit it. I'm an amoral person or I am the most principled person the most moral person. How? Because this is the trickster and this is the master right. Um let's look at the let's look at this one. I am um the most spiteful person right most spiteful person or I am the most uh strengthening person you know spyles inflicting damage.

to cause wounds, right? Strengthening to actually strengthen people who have weakness, right? And with that, there's different ways. Obviously, you have the demon and you have the angel, okay? When you're trying to reach cognitive integration, basically cognitive integration, or AKA Enlightenment, you're basically utilizing your cognitive gateways. And your gateways are, I'll show you right here, remember your cognitive gateways are your first function, your second one, or your uh, your fourth one, your fifth one, and your eighth one for your four gateways, okay? And those gateways are the pathways, those gateways are like neuropathways, right? Look at it this way, um, this is a giant interstate, okay? This is also an interstate, interstate. Another interstate is it? No, it's actually not an interstate. This is a highway, actually, you see? And in here, we have suburbs, you know, suburbs, and uh, utility roads, right? Suburb roads, utility roads, highway, interstates, um, but it's like a smaller interstate. It's not that big. And here, you know, you have um, city roads.

maybe some railroad here for the child. These are just examples, okay, but think about these in terms of neural pathways, okay? And I'm not saying all the gateways are interstates. This is just an example, and it might get a little confusing. I apologize. These are just examples, okay? So you can go into these roads. They may not have any payment on them. Like, because, like, for example, if you go on, like, something the equivalent of an interstate in China, there's no such thing as traffic laws in China. It's every man for himself. Your cognition is like every man for himself, basically. When you apply order, when you actually paint the ground and have street signs and laws that define that order, law and order, well, then everything goes through on these interstates, on these roads, in an orderly manner. And you have to develop your brain by building these neural pathways. Let's say you have your highway. That's your SC demon, right? No, when I'm reaching mastery, because I built all my other stuff, I could finally turn this into an

interstate. Oh, wait a minute. That means I could use my SE demon in a way that allows me to have more controlled traffic in an orderly manner. And instead of being spiteful because it's everyone for themselves on this highway, it's becoming very strengthening. And I could get my angel side anytime I want. Of course, some me being a spiteful ESS demon may actually be necessary for somebody. Like, if I saw some emo INFJ who was trying to tell me that they're going to kill themselves or they're cutting themselves, to which then I just start mocking them because it's for their own good. And me mocking them is actually the angel speaking through the demonic, uh, spiteful language. See what I'm saying? They're still useful. Like, guys, it's not like even your Vice function when you're talking about virtue and vice. Even your Vice function is useful, or your, or not Vice function, but even your Vice is useful. My Vice is insincerity, right? So sometimes being insincere protects.

myself you know uh just as much as being spiteful as demon could help somebody read the book when helping hurts sometimes you need to hurt people to help them. This is the ti concept of negative hurt something nfjs need to learn that would be nice something sfj's need to learn that would be nice but something that stps and ntps already have pretty much figured out okay and it's something that uh the te users just need to accept. I did a Wayfare lecture which pissed off a lot of people good do I regret it no absolutely not. You know everyone's like thank you Chase for your apology and to which I asked where did I apologize. I didn't I didn't apologize for anything but it just goes to show that there's people in this audience who you know make assumptions and they assume that I'm apologizing. I didn't apologize for anything actually all I said was is everyone is biased everyone's a hypocrite so am I. That's all I said I

was just telling a self-evident truth, but then people are labeling it, they're ad homing it, an apology. What? No, that was me just dressing up my words, right? Why is this relevant than about it, my spiteful demon going off in the way far lecture. I will admit I trashed way far types intentionally with a full force of my SE demon, and they all got offended, but at least they heard the truth, and many of them accepted the truth, and they're happy I did the lecture that way, and they said it was perfect. I got many letters from people, and then I did my fall live stream, and people then are saying, Oh, thank you for the apology, but I wasn't in my spiteful demon mode. But the result of me not being in my spiteful demon mode is not the truth, because they thought it was an apology. Do you guys see what I'm saying? Do you guys get it? So let me ask you this, why the should I stop being spiteful if the result is going to be people think uh if

people end up thinking the wrong thing. At the end, they literally thought it was an apology. It was not, but I was spiteful, and people got the truth, which is what I wanted them to hear. So, those people now can improve and have better lives, right? But then I make that live stream afterwards. You know what's funny about this? A lot of people don't realize this, and I'll share this with the rubies and sapphires here. I'll share this to you guys. Did you guys know that the Quadra lectures and that little open letter to the community, and while everything I said in the open letter to the community is 100% true, I stand by my words. I stand by my words, even on my little angry letter that I sent that morning on Facebook and everything. I stand by everything I said. If you really spend the time to actually read everything word for word, I never actually apologized. If you really did, I'm very careful, you know that sincerity virtue, right? I'm really careful about what I

say okay so when I'm doing that, is it not better to just be brutally honest with someone and allow my spiteful demon to get the truth out? Because then it will permanently maim them with the icy sword of truth, and then they'll remember that they need to behave better. But when I take that spitefulness away and then I do the open letter live stream like I did, all of a sudden everyone thinks I apologize, which is not even true. The point is I just concretely prove to you that there is value in being spiteful sometimes. There is value in giving into your Demon's power; there's value there. SI demons need SC demon to mock them so SI demon could be healthy; it's for their own good. But don't forget in past Ruby conferences I talked about ego hacking crap, ego hacking great groups of people, even a great multitude of people has SI demon, the SI demon for the multitude. Why is that? Because when God looks upon the Earth and looks on the ra

at the race he created. Is he not seeing a mere reflection of himself? So obviously, a crowd would have all these collective cognitive functions together, right? And I was Ming, the SI demon of the crowd. Do you guys not understand that my Quadro lectures in SE season 17 is literally an experiment that I've been running this entire time to prove that I can ego hack crowds of people? You have physical proof right in front of you, folks. Oh, but apparently, CS Joseph doesn't know what he's talking about. H. This is just a concrete example of why it's so important to understand the cogn gateways and to understand that as you use cognitive emulation, like using ined feeling trickster, for example. If I'm emulating morality by using all of my previous roads, think about it this way. It's a CO. It's a huge emergency. A natural disaster just went down. Everyone's trying to use all the roads at once to escape the natural disaster. And the only way to solve

getting the natural disaster is we have to get to the Lonely Mountain. Hopefully, there's not a dragon inside of it. We have to get into the Lonely Mountain away from everything, but it's fi trixster. It's a lonely Mountain. Oh crap, there's not very much space here on this road. There's holy crap. We have to part the Red Sea. We have to go to all of the effort to use fi trickster right now in order to solve This calamity that's in front of us where an entp is in a shitty ass situation such that the entp. Oh, and by the way, I no longer believe Gary vaynerchuk is an ENFP. I believe he's an entp. My bad. I'll do a lecture on that. Anyway, the point is when you have an entp who is forced in a situation, he realizes I have to show a form of moral principles in order to get out of this shitty situation. Okay, well, that's like you have to use

all of your cognitive functions or a series of your cognitive functions to emulate, and that means crap. I need to use my hero all the way down to my critic just to be able to produce what I need for the FI trickster and part the Red Sea and guess that little path. It's little tiny to get all those people to get all that cognition through that little path to get to the other side, right? That's hard. Yeah, maybe I should like build a highway there. See what I'm saying? Rewiring your brain is all about building neural pathways. You do it by starting with cognitive emulation. It forces the neurons in your brain to need new pathways. There's actually a story. There's actually a story about a guy who had a brain aneurysm, and he lived. He got it like he had. He had an MRI once on his brain because there was something else bothering him, and they're like, You have a brain aneurysm. He's like, Oh, okay. Does that

mean I'm okay. He's an INTP. It's funny. He's an INTP guy with a brain aneurism, and they're like, You seem to be fine. It's like your brain has rewired itself all the way around the brain aneurysm, and they're like, How did you do that? What are you spending all your time on? He's like, All I do is play Sudoku every day. I do it two hours a day, and I'm one of the top 10 Sudoku players in the world. Playing Sudoku helped his brain wire itself around his brain aneurysm to keep him alive. Do you guys not understand that when you use cognitive emulation, which is explained in season one, I'm talking a lot more about it in season 18, cognitive mechanics. Think of this as a preview to cognitive mechanics season, you're rewiring your brain, okay? And when you're rewiring your brain, you're getting to a point where it's like, 'Okay, um, I just wired my way around

the aneurysm. I just wired my way around not having feelings or morals because I'm an amoral person because hashtag I'm chaotic neutral, right? Have you thought of that? So what you end up doing, what you end up doing is that um eventually your trickster path gets upgraded to a highway. Now it's like well wait a minute CS Joseph does that mean it's still a trickster, it's a trickster or a master function. But the thing is chances are if you're upgrading your fi trickster through cognitive emulation and you're forcing your brain to rewire itself to create new neural pathways to your trickster function. What's happened to all the other areas of your brain by then? You've been using other areas of your brain, that other highways have been upgraded to interstates, other city roads have been upgraded to highways. You see what I'm saying? So the brain is growing in total, all of your cognitive functional preferences between all the cognitive attitudes, hero through demon.

they've received upgrades too in certain areas at certain times of your life, especially since you're already using those highways, those roads, those neural pathways more often than the others. Dario Nardi's work proves it. Read his book. Okay, this is literally what's happening. There's even pathways that will suggest that you're moving from your ego into your subconscious and back. There's even pathways to suggest that you're moving into your shadow side versus your ego. The problem is we can't exactly tell which is which, but I guess we could probably look at someone to help try to figure out what their cognitive focuses are, and then do a brain scan to just see like, you know, what it is. I'm sure there's some kind of consistencies there that we'll find out. Um, but I don't know for sure. Again, like when it comes to Dario Nardi, he does amazing work. I just need him to verify the types of people that he does put in through his machine first, and then we could actually look at what's

what and have proper data. That's all I want from him. Otherwise, his way, his approach is excellent. High five to him. Um, he's one of the few psychologists out there that I still, or neuroscientists, or someone who's involved in personality theory, that I think is more than credible. Because remember, guys, credibility is a form of ad hominem. Ad hominem is a logical fallacy. It's a lie, okay? Ad hominem is when you're in an argument with someone, and because you can't win the argument, you just start calling them names. That's ad hominem. Credibility does not mean someone who is credible does not mean someone's actually in ENT. That's just a te user's lazy way of saying I should listen to that guy. He's more believable. Credibility equals believability. Credibility does not equal truth. Credibility does not equal facts. Credibility is just ad hominem logical fallacy. So stop paying attention to people that are credible. An uncredible person is still capable of telling the truth. A biased

person is still capable of telling the truth, right? So, rewire your brain, create the neural pathways. It goes further. We talk about highways, interstates, right? But sometimes you need to be able to get off of a highway and onto an interstate, right? You use a junction. That's how you do it. A cognitive junction. Yay, cognitive junction. How to rewire your brain. Here's how I use the self-discipline of my introverted sensing, right? And I create a junction with it, okay? And that junction is able to wire my SI directly to my FI and vice versa, where it becomes a two-way street, kind of like a back road or junction where you're exiting and getting on the interstate because it's an interstate. It's a gateway, right? And I got a small little tiny ass highway here, if it is a highway. Hopefully, it is by now in my life, you know, to get onto the interstate. So then my introverted sensing, you know, what's great about introverted sensing? It's like Earth.

right you till the Earth and you know sometimes if it's not working with you because when you till the Earth it could it could get painful people get really uncomfortable they just don't want to change it takes a long time for SI to change cing the junction right so when I have to build a junction to be able to get fi out so inter sensing it's like Earth right you're tilling it you can shape it you can mold it that's what SE does it shapes SI it shapes it um so it's funny because SE is all about you know uh it's all about strength of character right strength of character and building character in others right so what sure her SE does her SE starts beining for my SI and making my SI stronger more dutiful right and what it does is it teaches or it strengthens teaches strengthens my introverted sensing okay teaches and strengthens it it makes me stronger it makes me have more Duty more loyalty more uh more Comfort uh in a lot of cases it gives me higher

strength of character, right? What this does is it also can make it pliable sometimes. It's like, Hey, you know, I need to road away some of the dust that you have in your SI and keep your SI fresh. Because what happens with the SI, isn't it? It gets really dusty. It's like a dust bowl. Where's the life, you know, wind and water? I got to make some mud here to make it so your SI is shaped right. This happens so my SI gets stronger, which means my self-discipline goes up. And when my self-discipline goes up, I need to know that it's my duty to make sure that I behave in a morally principled way for my wife, for the sake of her Effy child, right? Well, I'm able to do this because I'm able to do this um because uh of self-discipline. So what I end up realizing is is that what does Fie child really want? This is what it wants: I gratitude. So then I have the self-discipline to

remember to show gratitude. The action of showing real gratitude to my wife is the same or is equal to having an Fi function. So, what I've literally just done is created a junction neural pathway between my Fi and my Si, and I'm piping introverted feeling morality into my Si, and my Si is basically, through self-discipline, forcing myself to take the shape of Fi. Gratitude is an example to be able to provide that to Fe child and serve it up to F child on a platter. That's cognitive emulation turning into cognitive bridging, which is creating a neuropathway in the form of a junction so that I'm able to use my Fi function. This is what is literally mechanically happening in our brains physically. This is what cognitive emulation does. This is what allows you to reach cognitive integration and ultimately enlightenment. Perfect example of it directly from our marriage right here. Here's another example from our marriage. What happens when you pipe extroverted sensing demon via the

junction and pipe it also into SI. Well, then guess what? I end up having the self-discipline. I have the self-discipline to ask a question. What is that question? What's one of the biggest strengths and weaknesses of any NTP or any NTP? This applies to NTPs. Um, let me tell you right now, we're triple systematic. It's a major strength. Even NJs don't have this on this because NJs are not triple systematic. Triple being that you have um, a temperament or interaction style trait or communication style trait that is in your ego and your subconscious and your unconscious, right? Okay, so you have these things and my wife, she's triple direct, right? But I'm triple systematic, which means a systematic person is focused on doing, finding the best way to do something, focused on the best methodology to do something. And that means that NTPs, even better than NJs, can always find the best way to do something. So, I tell NTPs, if an NTJ is trying to tell you that their way

of doing something is the best way. Take with a grain of salt first because chances are you as an NTP actually know the better way anyway or will eventually know the better way anyway through trial and error. Sorry, it's a fact. It's one of the greatest strengths of an NTP. However, it's also one of the greatest weaknesses. Check this out. Because of the lack of interest-based awareness, this is where NTJs can usually take advantage of NTPs, especially if they're an NTP who is the victim of a con artist who is an NTJ. When that NTJ is trying to steal themselves some treasure, you know what I'm saying? Well, what happens is that if you're I lack interest, right? Well, the only side of my mind that's interest-based is my super ego. It's through my SC demon gateway, right? Because guess what? ESFP super ego is an interest-based thing, whereas my INJ side, ENTP side, ISFJ side, they're all systematic. So when an interest-based

person comes into my life. They know what they're getting out of something, and they know what I'm getting out of something. Typically, interest-based people create win-win situations, right? My wife, she's interest-based; she's all about the win-win. If she takes a loss as an interest-based person, if it's ever a win-lose or a lose-lose, the interest-based person automatically assumes they are being manipulated because it's technically true they are being manipulated. The thing is, if you're triple systematic, if you're an NTP, you're not aware of that at all. You're not even aware of that such that an interest-based person can manipulate someone who is triple systematic into realizing or into believing or into thinking that the best way to do something equals a lose. So, it's a lose-win in favor of the interest-based type, and the lose goes to the NTP who's triple systematic, but the NTP believes it's the best way to do something, so they're willing to take a lose, and they've just been manipulated.

and they don't even know it. My wife, rail gun, God bless her, found out that that's exactly what was happening to me, and she's like, Uh-uh, you're not doing that. Seie hero is like, I am so obligating your introverted sensing inferior. You're going to realize that ain't happening anymore. That has a huge character flaw that even puts me at risk. What the hell? We're going to be adjusting that character flaw. Okay, so she taught me something. She taught my SI self-discipline to do something every single time I have a new interaction or any interaction with any human being in my life. The question always comes up in my head, and I force myself to do this. I had to practice to do this. The question comes up in my head, What is this person getting out of the situation compared to what I am getting out of the situation? Doing that comparison also forces me to use te critic. Te critic is wisdom, right? So she's actually teaching me how to use my interest-based demon and my te critic at

the same time, and both of them are getting piped at the same time, being intertwined with each other like a helix, right? And being piped directly into a shared neural pathway. Directly into my introverted sensing inferior function when it's aspiring, because when it's aspiring, the road's a lot bigger, right? And then I could pipe Shadow functions into that Gateway if I need to, and you can do the same thing in your hero, you can do the same thing into your Nemesis, any Gateway function. You can pipe other functions into the pipe or Junction. I'm using programming language terms, my bad guys, I'm an engineer, Sumi. But the point is, in this particular case, I end up having the SI inferior SI aspirational self-discipline to ask every time I come into contact with somebody, What is this person getting out of this versus what am I getting out of this? And if they are getting more out of it than I am, I'm being manipulated, and I need to stop. It allows me to create a

boundary with that person to protect myself. Do you know how many times I have people asking me random questions, and I'm like, Go watch the video. It has this answer. Then they get all pissed off at me as if I'm just their, you know, as if I'm their doormat, right? Or I'm their, I'm their little bellhop where I have to, like, you know, they ring a little bell, and I dutifully answer their question because ENTP Stockholm syndrome, right? But piping my TE critic and my SE demon directly into my SI, right? Okay, well, that's not a problem for me anymore. Do you know how many people I've blocked in 2019? I counted 600 plus people I have blocked in 2019 since knowing my wife because I realized I was being manipulated by a lot of people. So obviously, people like me need to make sure that I'm able to pipe in aspects of my superego and use it. Now, most triple systematic types, they don't even think that, Oh, hey, I should

probably be using the temperament of my super ego to help protect myself because I'm not interest-based, and even then, I still make mistakes with being social engineered from a systematic standpoint. But then I realize, hey, what is this person getting out of it versus what am I getting out of it? If they're getting more out of it than I am, they're manipulating me because that's a fact. Wasn't even G to occur to an ENFP or to an ENTP. It just wouldn't. Or an INP for that matter until, of course, my ESTP wife comes around. See folks, it's literally building neural pathways through cogn as a result of cognitive emulation, as a result of having a demand on your life, nurtury speaking. My wife is providing nurtural pressure on my nature, which causes me to develop neural pathways to produce lower functions, attributes of lower functions, and lower sides of the mind, including their communication styles and their temperaments or dispositions, right? And piping that directly to use those tools even in my

ego. That's what cognitive emulation is. But eventually, it becomes second nature as those pathways are built, and then it gets you closer to cognitive integration, which gets you closer to Enlightenment. Do you guys not understand what I'm saying here? That's how this mechanically works. It's just physically for all those NJs out there or for all those SE users out there. It's literally just building neuropathways. This is how cognitive focus actually works. Cognitive focus is when you're, you know, um, I'm an INTJ focused ENTP, right? It's because I have more neural pathways going between my INTJ side and my ego, right? Or Taylor Swift, she's an INTJ focused ESFP. She has more pathways to her subconscious than her unconscious to her ego, which means her gateway functions are more expanded, they're more orderly, they're more capable, right? They're a lot more narrow when they're smaller. They become less narrow over time as they're used, right? But people, you know, they prefer to use their hero and their child.

for everything that's the most mature people. They need to build some pathways. They need to get some junctions going. They need to be upgrading their highways to interstates. You know what I'm saying? So anyway, that is how to rewire your brain, and that concludes the lecture portion of the Rubri conference for January 2020. Let's move on to question and answer as of now. Um, okay, so Q&A is up, and everyone has the ability to speak. I would like to take questions now at this time. Go ahead, anyone. So what's up? You could actually use water pipes and just explain skinnier, maybe elastic pipes. Oh yeah, that's actually a better model. That's actually a really good point. I could have used that. Okay, all right. Yeah, that's really good feedback. Okay, I'd really like to have Dario Nardi as a guest for the Ruby conference, honestly. Um, I might actually reach out to him. I think she already did see him, or I did see him. Um, he did a

conference here in the Bay Area, and then he was so gracious. He spent like five hours with us afterwards, just sitting there talking. It was awesome. But um, yeah, I'm going to go down to LA to do the full brain scan. A couple of us already did from the group, so it was pretty informative. Yeah, told me he got his brain scanned. That's pretty awesome. I want my brain scan, like sign me up. Yeah, that's awesome. I'd be happy to have that conversation with him, like for sure. Well, uh, looks like that's everything, folks. Uh, thanks for uh, coming and uh, thanks for thanks for being here. Um, thank you all for being my patrons, and I hope you guys found this uh, presentation to be pretty helpful or enlightening for you. So, that's my hope at least. It was awesome, Chase. Thanks so much. Thank you. Hope you guys are feeling better. Thanks. Thank you all too. Uh, have a good night then. See you guys later. Bye, Chas.

How to Build Neural Pathways Through Cognitive Emulation

C.S. Joseph

이 컨퍼런스에서는 최신 주제에 대한 라이브 강의와 토론 시간이 이어집니다.

연사는 인지 에뮬레이션과 신경 경로에 대한 인사이트를 공유하며 개인적 성장에 있어 감사와 도덕적 원칙의 중요성을 강조합니다.

이러한 개념의 실제 적용은 연사 자신의 경험과 성격 역학에 대한 성찰을 통해 설명됩니다.

두뇌 재구성: 인지 혁신의 여정

뇌를 재구성하는 것은 새로운 신경 경로를 만드는 자연스러운 과정이며 대인관계의 역학 관계에 영향을 받습니다.

이해관계에 기반한 개인은 종종 윈윈 상황을 만드는 반면, 체계적 유형은 조작을 인식하지 못할 수 있습니다.

뇌 시스템의 복잡성 때문에 미적분 기반 알고리즘과 같은 기술을 사용하여 인지 행동을 이해하고 영향을 미치는 미묘한 접근 방식이 필요합니다.

MBTI 테스트는 40명 이상의 코칭 고객이 참여한 검증 프로세스를 기반으로 20%의 정확도를 자랑합니다.

5명 중 1명이라는 통계의 일관성은 지난 6개월 동안 관찰되었습니다.

연사는 신뢰와 진실의 차이를 강조하며 신뢰할 수 없는 사람도 여전히 진실을 말할 수 있다고 주장합니다.

이 개념은 준차원 주판을 사용하여 잠재적 벡터를 식별하고 뇌와 마음을 측정하는 알고리즘을 개발하는 것을 포함합니다.

이 접근 방식은 신경과학과 개인 개발 사이의 상관관계를 증명하기 위해 심리학 연구를 위한 사용자 데이터를 수집하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

궁극적인 비전은 인지 에뮬레이션과 신경 경로 개발을 통해 문화적 정체성을 재평가하고 통합과 깨달음을 달성하여 글로벌 영향력을 창출하는 것입니다.

뇌를 다시 연결하기: 독특한 접근 방식

ESFJ 유형은 통계적으로 성격 이론에 가장 관심이 적은 반면, INTP, INFJ, INFP 유형은 가장 많은 관심을 보였습니다.

성격 퀴즈는 더 많은 INXX 유형을 끌어들여 분석의 편향성을 야기할 것으로 예상됩니다.

연사는 두뇌를 재구성하기 위해 인지 접합부와 신경 경로를 만드는 것이 중요하다고 강조하며, 퀴즈의 실시간 분석을 통해 사회 변화를 주도하고 사람들의 삶을 개선하는 데 사용할 계획입니다.

뇌를 다시 배선하려면 인지 브리지라고도 하는 새로운 신경 경로를 만들어 인지 에뮬레이션으로 이어지게 합니다.

이 과정의 목표는 통합과 깨달음을 달성하여 궁극적으로 자신의 최고 버전이 되는 것입니다.

자아 해킹 군중 실험과 곧 출시될 성격 퀴즈는 데이터를 수집하고 향후 몇 년 동안 개인의 성장과 이해를 위한 근본적인 해답을 제공하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

SE는 SI를 형성하고 강화하며 의무감, 충성도, 편안함을 조성하는 데 중요한 역할을 합니다.

인지 에뮬레이션을 통해 두뇌를 재구성하는 것은 새로운 신경 경로를 구축하고 개인적인 성장을 이루기 위해 필수적입니다.

NTP는 독특한 삼중 체계적 특성을 가지고 있어 일을 처리하는 데 가장 좋은 방법을 찾을 수 있지만, 이로 인해 NTJ와 같은 관심 기반 개인에 의한 조작에 취약할 수도 있습니다.

개인 개발에서 인지 에뮬레이션의 역할

인지 에뮬레이션은 다른 사람과의 상호작용을 통해 신경 경로를 구축하여 하위 기능과 속성을 개발하는 것을 포함합니다.

이 과정은 저자와 ESTP인 아내와의 관계에서 볼 수 있듯이 양육 압력의 영향을 받습니다.

자기 성찰을 연습하고 사회적 상황에서 개인적인 이득을 비교함으로써 저자는 인지 기능을 더 효과적으로 사용하는 방법을 배워 궁극적으로 인지 통합과 개인적 성장을 목표로 합니다.