브라이언 존슨의 불멸을 향한 탐구: 비판적 분석

### 불멸의 환상: 브라이언 존슨의 영생에 대한 탐구
* 🔮 장수 연구자들에 따르면 브라이언 존슨의 영생 추구에 대해 **"성공하지 못할 것"**이라는 주장이 제기되는 등 회의적인 시각이 지배적입니다.
* 💰 비평가들은 존슨이 지속 불가능한 라이프스타일을 조장하면서 사람들의 죽음에 대한 두려움을 이용해 이익을 취하는 **'약탈자'**라고 주장합니다.
* 📖 최근 타임지 기사에서는 **칼로리를 제한하는 비건 채식과 발기를 측정하는 특이한 장치**를 포함한 존슨의 극단적인 식이요법을 소개했지만 과학적 검증이 부족합니다.
* 장수 전문가들은 그의 건강이 창백해 보이고 **전반적인 웰빙에 중요한 필수 체지방이 부족**해 보인다고 지적하며 우려를 표했습니다.
* 🍏 칼로리 제한이 다른 종의 수명을 연장하는 데는 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났지만, **인간에게 미치는 영향은 아직 불확실**하며 영양실조나 섭식 장애를 유발할 수 있습니다.
* 📉 연구자들은 건강의 발전에도 불구하고 인간의 최대 수명은 크게 향상되지 않았으며, **확인된 최고령자는 122세까지 살았다고 강조**합니다.
* 🧠 죽음을 피하는 것을 목표로 하는 회사를 포함한 존슨의 사업에는 **몰몬교 신앙에서 자란 그의 뿌리 깊은 죽음에 대한 두려움**가 반영되어 있을 가능성이 있습니다.
* 🛌 궁극적으로 불멸을 추구하는 것은 **"일부 남성은 치료를 받느니 차라리 취침 시 제트팩을 음경에 착용하는 것을 선호"**하기 때문에 더 광범위한 건강 문제를 해결하는 데 방해가 될 수 있습니다.

불멸을 향한 브라이언 존슨의 탐구는 죽음에 대한 깊은 두려움과 괴로운 갈망을 드러냅니다.

Brian Johnson is going to die one day, don't worry, don't report me to YouTube. It's not a threat, I'm not going to contribute to that end in any way. I am merely making a prediction based upon statistics and I think it's important to

lead with that because all of the mainstream media coverage of this man leads with the fact that Brian Johnson thinks he's going to live forever and he's going above and beyond to increase his chances. I want to make it very clear that in my

opinion and in the opinion of scientists who researched longevity, he is not going to succeed. Furthermore, it is my personal opinion that Brian Johnson is a grifter who, regardless of whether or not he actually believes he's going to live forever, is absolutely trying to make a

quick buck off of people who are terrified of the idea of death and who have more money than common sense. Now this guy pops up in the news every now and again. The most recent example is this Time magazine article by Charlotte Alter, which is admittedly pretty

entertaining, it still gives him way more credit than he is due. But I have to admit I did chuckle at lines like 'he has the body of an 18-year-old and the face of someone who had spent millions attempting to look like an 18-year-old'

because yeah, you know, if you look at Johnson's Wiki photo and compare it to times it's, well, you know, he's made a choice and I support his ability to decide what to do with his own face, even if that means throwing it away and starting over again.

from scratch in the profile alter hangs out with Johnson for a few days to observe his routine, which includes eating a calorie-restricted vegan diet, taking 111 supplement pills every day, and wearing a tiny jet pack on his penis at night to measure his erections for

reasons. It nearly goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway: there is no real scientific basis for Johnson's lifestyle. It actually may be actively bad for his health, and it sounds absolutely miserable. I particularly liked the detail alter includes from longevity researchers who met Johnson at

a conference. He looked sick. He was pale. I don't know what he did with his face, Dr. Barzillai says, adding that he was alarmed by Johnson's lack of fat, which plays an important role in the body. All these MDs, we all kind of agreed that he

didn't look so great. That said, I do want to point out that some of the things he's doing are probably beneficial if they were done in combination with an overall healthy lifestyle. Like, banning electronics from bed, that's a great idea. Electronics other than your nighttime

penis jet pack, of course, which all doctors agree everyone should have, regardless of whether you have a penis or not. He's also terrified of driving, which is pretty healthy. Cars are death machines, and if manufacturers installed a device that forced drivers to acknowledge that before the ignition

turns over, maybe paired with a breathalyzer, like that would probably save as many lives as the seat belt. Finally, uh, the calorie restriction. For decades now, that has been one of the most promising avenues of life extension in short-lived species. Drastically reducing calories down to what a rat or

Mice need food for basic survival. It reliably extends their lifespans by about 50 percent, and overall they're much healthier, which uh, you know, is because it seems to slow down certain biomarkers of aging. And in recent years, research has shown that these benefits

may extend to primates as well. For instance, in this study from 2018, lemurs who ate about 30 percent less than their friends lived about 50 percent longer and were healthier overall. However, they did see a reduction in gray matter, but there was no corresponding loss in

cognitive or behavioral abilities. So, you know, there might be a downside, but if you're just looking at extending lifespan, yeah, calorie restriction seems to work. Calorie restriction in humans has also shown promise, but we live so long that the researchers who study it are forced to just look at those

biomarkers I mentioned, which are a bit controversial, you know, they don't necessarily perfectly correlate to an increased maximum lifespan. So, we won't know for sure for like another 80 years or so, but those longevity researchers I quoted earlier have a point in that

having a little bit of fat on us may help humans survive certain age-related uh, diseases and injuries like falls. And, you know, then there's the issue of needing to pay such close attention to your diet that you're eating the right amount of calories but not ending up

malnourished. And then there's making sure that you're mentally healthy enough that you don't accidentally end up overly obsessed and having an eating disorder. I mean, if it's even possible not to. So, yeah, I'm definitely not recommending it, but I do want to

acknowledge that yeah as calorie restriction does have a basis in science as in terms of living a longer life I also want to call out another quote from the Time article where Dr. Pinchas Cohen dean of the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at the University of

Southern California says death is not optional it's written into our genes that quote actually sent me on a side quest to see what the current consensus is on that and it is true but also I think it might be a little simplistic in there for um likely to be misunderstood so I just

want to share quickly what I learned here's an overview of the field from researchers at Dr. Barzilai's institution that's the guy who said that Johnson looked sickly at that aging conference this perspective which was published in Nature to educate those outside of the

discipline and it's available in full online as always you can find a link in the transcript link below it describes the evidence for a limit to human lifespan as overwhelming but notes that even if there were a genetic program a hard limit would not exist because

occasionally individuals would be born with mutations deactivating that program instead it seems like the limit is more statistical it's a soft limit that might occasionally be exceeded by random lucky people but eventually something's gonna get you thanks to aging a complicated

process which yes is mostly dictated by our genes that's why humans have made huge leaps in mean lifespan mostly thanks to stopping all those infants from dying but also due to upgrades in our diets and our sanitation but in all that time we've made zero progress on

improving maximum lifespan our oldest verified human was 122 when she died in 1997 and in the 26 years since then we haven't even come close to matching that despite huge improvements in the health of seniors and half a million centenarians currently alive in the

world today so mean lifespan we're doing a great job of improving it maximum hasn't budged for that reason the people who actually study aging and Longevity tend to not really consider it important or even scientifically interesting to try to extend our maximum lifespan to

try to achieve immortality it's such an improbable goal and additionally it would benefit pretty much no one because we still have so many people dying unnecessarily before they even hit the mean lifespan and so many more people who are living unnecessarily painful and

unhealthy lives even when they hit or exceed the mean lifespan that's why researchers have a term called Health span that's the amount of your life that you live that is healthy while maximum lifespan is practically immutable we can through research and public policy

improve mean lifespan and health span for the majority of humans living today and so isn't that where we should focus our energy Brian Johnson clearly disagrees and honestly I think I understand why like first yes there's the grift I mentioned earlier Johnson got his millions of

dollars because he founded Braintree a payment processor that he sold to PayPal in 2013 for 800 million dollars according to a 2017 article in MIT's Technology Review he asked hundreds of experts what to do with this windfall and their advice led him to investing in

neurotechnology creating the company Colonel with a hundred million dollars in seed money which he used to hire Dr. Theodore Berger, professor of biomedical engineering and Neuroscience and director of the center for neural engineering at the University of Southern California. Berger developed a memory prosthesis, but then left Colonel

just six months later because Berger's vision, according to several people, was too complex, too speculative, and too far from becoming a medical reality. While Johnson hoped to see a return on his investment sometime soon, they have a new direction, but we're still talking, says Berger. The basic reason is it was going

to take too long. It's one thing to think about this and quite another to do it. Johnson says he concluded that Berger's work is really interesting, but not an entry point into a commercially viable business. Now that's really weird because I recently heard that capitalists drive

scientific progress, huh? I guess that's another story. Anyway, digital brains weren't profitable enough, so Johnson has now pivoted to this new company that he calls Blueprint, which offers to build your autonomous self with an algorithm that takes better care of me than I can

myself. The starter kit is coming soon, but in the meanwhile, you can buy one and a half liters of olive oil for seventy-five dollars. It's sourced from both hemispheres to ensure freshness and abundant polyphenols, which studies show can potentially safeguard against

various cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and neurodegenerative conditions by reducing oxidized LDL. Oh, also it's peppery and smooth. Just as a heads up though, Costco has olive oil with the same number of polyphenols for 18.99. So, oh, and that's two liters. It's

actually more so yeah it's a grift anyway uh he wasn't seeing the immediate returns on computer brain interfaces and he didn't like the complicated gobbledygook from the scientists who actually studied these things so instead he decided to be Gwyneth Paltrow's bro and to

one up her instead of looking pretty or being healthy his promise is you get to live forever but I also want to say that in my opinion I think that this goes beyond just the grift for him both of his recent companies are focused in some

way on avoiding death you know Kernel was about maybe transferring our consciousness to the cloud Blueprint is about the physical body living forever one expert quoted in the Time article says if you want immortality you should go to a church and I think that that is

spot on um Johnson actually grew up as a Mormon and even went on a mission in Ecuador but he left the church pretty late you know when he was in his 30s and I think that that background has given him what appears to me to be an absolute

all-encompassing fear of death and I get that you know I was raised Baptist and I fully believed in it but I realized I was an atheist when I was 18. and I was absolutely horrified to realize that I was going to cease to

exist one day horrified and yeah you know people tried to tell me you know but you weren't worried about not existing before you were born and I'm like wow now I am thanks for giving me something new to freak out about but also that already happened

Um, this is going to happen, it's not the same. Uh, and I'm glad that some people are able to transition from assuming that they had uh a forever life, that they would go on into eternity with their loved ones forever. I'm glad that some

people were able to transition from thinking that, from knowing that, to then knowing that they would cease to exist one day and being okay with it. Like that speaks to your good mental health. I, I did not have that. I, I had to work really hard to uh process things, you know, to

work mentally, psychologically, philosophically on myself. The two things that really did it for me in the end, one was going on anti-anxiety medication so I could stop obsessing about things I can't control, and two, accepting that we are all star stuff, that we are the

universe learning about itself, that we all continue in an ever-changing and mysterious future existence, and that I, I as a person, as an individual, am ultimately not that important. Carl Sagan and the Buddhists basically helped me a lot, and modern medicine. But I think that

Johnson hasn't done that work yet. Like a lot of multi-millionaires and billionaires, you know, he is stuck on this egocentric desire to extend his own life as long as possible, even at the expense of making other people's lives better. And that's unhealthy for humanity

just as much as it's unhealthy for Johnson himself. I guess what I'm saying is that some men would rather wear a bedtime jetpack on their penis than go to therapy. [Music] Hey everybody, thanks for watching. If you enjoyed this video, please give it a like

If you loved the video, please subscribe, and if you think the world could use more videos like this and you happen to have a few bucks laying around, head to patreon.com/Rebecca and join an awesome community of nerds like the people whose names you see on the screen right now.

Bryan Johnson is Going to Die (Sorry)

Rebecca Watson (Skepchick)

브라이언 존슨의 장수 추구에 대한 소개와 비판

연사는 불멸을 추구하는 존슨의 모습을 미디어에서 묘사하는 것과 대조하면서 브라이언 존슨의 최종적인 죽음을 예측합니다.

연사는 장수 연구자들과 마찬가지로 존슨의 노력이 성공하지 못할 것이라는 의견을 표명합니다.

화자는 존슨을 '도둑놈'이라고 표현하며 그가 죽음에 대한 사람들의 두려움을 금전적 이득을 위해 악용한다고 암시합니다.

발표자는 타임지 기사를 언급하며 존슨에 대한 재미있으면서도 지나치게 긍정적인 묘사를 강조합니다.

화자는 존슨의 외모에 대해 언급하며 그가 주장한 나이와 실제 외모가 다르다는 점을 지적합니다.

존슨의 라이프스타일과 과학적 타당성 분석

존슨의 루틴에는 엄격한 비건 채식, 다양한 보충제, 페니스 제트팩과 같은 특이한 관행이 포함되어 있습니다.

장수 연구자들은 존슨이 컨퍼런스에 참석했을 때 몸이 좋지 않고 놀라울 정도로 마른 모습을 보였습니다.

취침 전 전자기기 사용 자제, 운전하지 않기 등 존슨의 라이프스타일 중 일부는 잠재적으로 유익한 것으로 인정받고 있습니다.

수명이 짧은 종의 수명 연장에 대한 칼로리 제한의 효과와 함께 인간에게 미치는 잠재적 이점과 단점에 대해 논의합니다.

연사는 인간의 칼로리 제한을 둘러싼 복잡성과 불확실성, 그리고 장기적인 영향에 대해 언급합니다.

죽음은 피할 수 없다는 명언을 살펴보고, 수명 제한에 대한 과학적 합의에 대해 토론합니다.

발표자는 인간의 수명에 통계적 한계가 있기는 하지만 절대적이고 딱딱한 한계는 아니라는 연구 결과를 요약합니다.

평균 수명을 늘리는 데는 상당한 진전이 있었지만 최대 수명은 크게 변하지 않았습니다.

연구자들은 최대 수명을 늘리는 데 집중하는 것보다 건강 수명과 평균 수명을 개선하는 데 우선순위를 둡니다.

단순히 수명을 연장하는 것보다 건강한 생활의 중요성을 강조하는 건강수명 개념이 도입되었습니다.

존슨의 비즈니스 벤처 및 동기 분석

존슨이 브레인트리를 통해 얻은 부와 이후 신경 기술에 대한 투자에 대해 논의합니다.

신경공학에 중점을 둔 존슨의 회사 Kernel이 언급되며, 그 도전 과제와 궁극적인 방향 전환에 대해 설명합니다.

연사는 존슨의 비즈니스 의사 결정의 맥락에서 과학적 진보를 주도하는 자본주의적 내러티브에 의문을 제기합니다.

존슨의 새로운 회사인 블루프린트와 올리브 오일 마케팅은 잠재적으로 악용될 소지가 있는 것으로 드러났습니다.

연사는 존슨의 동기가 단순한 금전적 이득을 넘어 죽음에 대한 뿌리 깊은 두려움에서 비롯된 것임을 시사합니다.

죽음과 정신 건강에 대한 개인적인 성찰

연사는 죽음이라는 개념과 씨름했던 개인적인 경험과 이를 받아들이기까지의 과정을 공유합니다.

화자는 죽음을 받아들이는 자신의 여정과 죽음에 대한 두려움에 직면하는 것을 회피하는 존슨의 모습을 대조합니다.

연사는 약물 치료와 철학적 전환을 포함하여 죽음에 대한 두려움을 처리하는 데 사용한 대처 메커니즘에 대해 설명합니다.

화자는 사망률에 대한 자신의 접근 방식과 존슨의 접근 방식을 대조하며, 후자의 자기 보존에 대한 자기 중심적 초점을 강조합니다.

연사는 존슨의 접근 방식이 자신과 인류 모두에게 건강하지 않다고 비판하며 마무리합니다.