기독교에 대한 빌리 카슨의 주장에 대한 반박

### 기독교에 대한 빌리 카슨의 주장 반박: 비판적 분석
* 📖 지난 한 주 동안 많은 기독교인들이 성경과 기독교에 대한 **빌리 카슨의 주장**으로 인해 신앙이 흔들렸다고 밝혔으며, 그의 인터뷰는 **수백만 건의 조회수**를 기록했습니다.
* 🔍 카슨은 자신을 고대 텍스트의 전문가로 소개하지만, 자세히 살펴보면 **예수에게 아내가 있었다고 주장하는 책이 실제로는 위조된 것**이라고 주장하는 등 그의 주장에 상당한 부정확성이 있음을 알 수 있습니다.
* ✍ 또한 예수의 십자가 처형은 기독교와 비기독교 학자 모두가 지지하는 **고대 역사상 가장 확실한 사실** 중 하나임에도 불구하고 특정 텍스트에 존재하지 않는다고 주장하며 잘못 표현하고 있습니다.
* 📜 카슨이 토스의 에메랄드 석판과 같은 모호한 문서를 언급하는 것은 **신뢰할 만한 증거와 역사적 타당성이 부족**하여 고대 텍스트의 권위자로서 그의 신뢰성을 더욱 떨어뜨리고 있습니다.
* 💔 노예 주인을 공경하는 것에 대한 인용문을 바울이 아닌 **예수님에게 돌리는 등 성경을 잘못 해석한 것**은 성경의 문맥과 번역에 대한 이해 부족을 드러내는 것입니다.
* 또한 **'예배 유전자'와 인간의 리듬이 '지구보다는 화성'에 더 가깝다는 카슨의 주장**은 근거가 없고 과학적 근거가 부족하며, 이해 없이 유행어를 사용하는 패턴을 드러내고 있습니다.
* 🤔 궁극적으로 기독교인들은 감정적 반응이 종종 믿음에 영향을 미친다는 사실을 기억해야 하며, **카슨과 같은 주장을 액면 그대로 받아들이기보다는 비판적으로 평가**하는 것이 중요합니다.
* 📚 오늘날의 디지털 환경에서는 잘못된 정보가 만연해 있기 때문에 기독교에 대한 의구심을 품고 있는 사람들은 **기독교에 대한 문제가 되는 주장에 대해 조사**하고 근거 있는 대응책을 찾는 것이 중요합니다.

기독교에 대한 빌리 카슨의 주장은 신뢰할 만한 증거가 부족하고 성경 본문을 잘못 해석하여 많은 사람들을 오도하고 있습니다.

Over the last week, I read countless comments from Christians who said that their faith was rocked by listening to Billy Carson's claims about the Bible and Christianity. His interviews lately seem to consistently be getting millions of views. But although I can understand why he sounds persuasive, if you take the time to look into his claims, you'll see that in no way should his arguments be convincing. So let's talk about what's wrong with his arguments, why claims like his shouldn't bother your faith, and what I think might be the real reason he goes after Christianity so much. So, similar to Terence Howard, Billy prides himself on being an exceptional source of information. Guess what, guys? I'm one of the foremost world leaders in the knowledge of ancient texts and scriptures. Papyrus, still. And it's because of this that people find his arguments against Jesus and Christianity to be persuasive since they believe him to be an expert on ancient texts. But let's see what the smallest bit of investigation does to his claims. Let's start with one of his claims about Jesus.

that you may have heard before. In the Harvard Library, there is a book of Jesus's wife at the Harvard Seminary school, and they found about 8 years ago Jesus's wife is the Mary Magdalene, which means he probably had kids, and his Merovingian bloodline is still probably walking the land till this very day. Wow, yeah. So, for someone who claims to be one of the world's leading experts on ancient texts, this is a pretty shocking claim when he claims that they found a book that says that Jesus had a wife. Of course, he's wrong. You can look it up. It wasn't at all a book that they found. What they found was a small fragment, this one right here. This is a tiny piece of papyrus that has a small inscription on it that says, Jesus said to them, 'My wife.' And that's what he's basing his claim off of. But the only problem is, as Billy has to know, not only was it not a book that was found, the fragment was also found to be a forgery.

from someone who wrote that inscription on an old piece of papyrus. You can't even Google Jesus's wife without seeing tons of articles on it. Harvard was initially fooled into thinking that it was legit, only to later retract their claims after proving that it was a forgery. So, his claim is quite literally fiction, not history. That's in the what was that great uh book, uh the Dan Brown book, uh The Da Vinci Code. D Vinci Code, yeah, yes, yes, yes, yes. So, seeing himself as an authority on ancient text, Billy also says that there's several mistranslations in the Bible. And here he says that he found a big one of I give you one big uh translation that's off. Is they say, Well, um, Jesus was crucified. Whoa! Well, that doesn't exist in the Sinai Bible. What happened? It doesn't exist in the book of Barnabas. But they left that out of the Bible on purpose, purp by accident. So, how did they kill him? They didn't kill him, Billy. Now, if you've spent any time

looking at the historical facts about Jesus, then you'll immediately know that he's wrong here. Look it up. Not only is the crucifixion of Jesus one of the most established facts in ancient history, according to even atheist scholars and historians, but when he cites things like the Sinai Bible or the book of Barnabas, it makes it difficult to believe that he's not just using these words for the purpose of sounding sophisticated. When he mentions the book of Barnabas, this is a pseudepigraphical gospel which was written in the late Middle Ages, so anywhere from 1300 to 1500 AD. So, it's no wonder why it wasn't included in the Bible because it was over a thousand years late. And so, you might say, Well, maybe he misspoke and he's really referring to the Epistle of Barnabas, which would be a much stronger claim since it was found alongside of the Sinai Bible and dated around the 4th century. But it would still be false since the manuscripts of the epistle

included the gospels, meaning that it included the crucifixion. So, once again, I'm really hesitant to believe Billy when he says, I'm one of the foremost world leaders in the knowledge on Ancient text. He also quotes the Bible as saying this: The Ark of the Covenant is something that has so much radiation that you had to have on a specific type of clothing, which is well described even in the Bible: rubber boots. And somebody didn't have it on in the Bible, and they touched the ark, they would become very sick, their hair would fall out, their nose would bleed, their eyes would bleed, their fingernails would fall off. Oh, Billy. But, of course, that isn't what the Bible says at all. The Bible says nothing about wearing rubber boots, nor does it mention any of the other things that he describes. It says nothing about them getting sick, their hair falling out, or their eyes and skin melting away. It only says that the anger of the Lord burned against the person that touched the ark. Billy seems to be getting this from the

story about the Arc of the Covenant found in Indiana Jones, not the Bible. But Billy also tells us that this was all proven by science. They recreated this at a university in America. Really? What university created this? Uh, Google it. I can't remember the name of the university, but, or, uh, you can look it up. But when you look it up, for some strange reason, you can't find the recreation of the scenario at a university, which, as we'll come to find, is a bit of a theme for a lot of Billy's claims. Billy also continuously refers to obscure documents to prove that the Bible is wrong, documents such as the Emerald tablets of Thoth. But as soon as you start to do any research here, you'll find that not only do these alleged tablets not predate the Bible, but you won't find these tablets in a museum. And Billy won't ever show us these tablets because they simply don't exist. Can't remember the name of the university, but, or, uh, you can look it up. There's literally no evidence that these tablets exist, and there's no evidence

that anything referring to them possibly could predate Jesus. The first we learned about these so-called tablets was only about a hundred years ago when a guy named Maurice Der Real claimed to find these tablets without showing them to anyone, translated them in secret, and strangely wasn't able to provide any evidence that he actually found these tablets. Not to mention Billy claims that these tablets were written over 3,600 years ago. To explain why this is so ridiculous is because the oldest writings that we have are at best 6,000 years old. So to believe that one guy single-handedly translated them by himself in secret from a written language that has to be over 30,000 years older than the oldest written language that we're aware of, that requires a really strong suspension of skepticism. But every now and then Billy will actually reference the Bible, which is great, but unfortunately he seems to get it wrong when he says stuff like this. In the New Testament, Jesus says honor your slave master. Now why would we want to honor a slave?

master as you would honor me. He says, Do you think Jesus really would say something like that? I don't. H. Good question. Why would Jesus say something like that? Well, the truth is, he didn't, which is why you won't find a verse of Jesus saying it if you try to Google it, look it up. The verse that Billy's referring to and still misquoted isn't from Jesus at all, but instead it's a verse from Paul in Ephesians 6. And I think I'm being fair when I say that Billy likely hasn't ever read the verse, but only heard about it from others. Because if he did, then he would also know what Paul was trying to do in that passage. Paul wasn't trying to start a revolution, but instead he was addressing the established common households at that time and was telling Christians how they should live in the situations that they were already in. This is why Paul starts with addressing the children, then the fathers, then the slave, and then the slave masters, who by the way he tells to

treat their servants with respect and fear and not to threaten them, which is a far cry from the implication that Billy was trying to leave people with. But when he says things like this, it sounds persuasive because we often impose our knowledge of American slavery onto the context of the Bible, not realizing the difference. I've covered this topic at length extensively in other videos that you can find on this channel if you want to learn more. But even though Billy claims to be an expert in Hebrew, it's clear that he literally doesn't understand even the most basic Hebrew. When he says things like this, What do you think of about about the Bible? Well, the Bible has a lot of good information in it. If you can apply some of the information, it can really change your life. It can really put you on the right path. But it also has some information in that's detrimental to people as well. Detrimental, okay. That's a pretty strong claim. Like what detrimental to people as well. Do you have to have

discernment with what you're reading in the book in the Bible in the Bible where you see the word god everywhere that's a mistranslation by accident on purpose the original word is God's with an S it's always with an S when you back you know back reverse back engineer the actual word the translations you find out this God's not God singular Elohim is also a plural term it's not a singular term all right not only would it not be detrimental to society if Billy was right about this point but he's also exactly wrong look it up now to be fair there's more legitimacy in a second claim that Elohim is plural since Elohim is a concretized abstract plural which just means that it's a word that can be used as plural or singular like how the English word sheep can refer to one sheep or multiple sheep the reason why we know it's singular is because the verbs in the Hebrew are also singular but when he says that God which is L in

Hebrew is plural. He's wrong. I mean, again, just Google it. You can look at anyone who knows literally anything about Hebrew translation will tell you the same thing. There's absolutely nothing in the Hebrew manuscripts that will support his strong claim, this claim that he bases his entire arguments off of. He uses claims like this in support of other wild views that he has, such as the belief that Jesus was an alien. And when he brings in science, it doesn't seem that he does much better to get us to take orders from them. They inserted something called a worship gene, which was just discovered recently, that human beings have a gene inside of them that can be turned on and turned off. It can be turned off in a laboratory setting. It can also be turned off with a magnetic field around your head. And when it's off, you don't want to worship anything outside of yourself. You look inside. And when it's on, you look to get something from the outside. So this is incredible. Now, as far as I know, he never

claimed to be an expert on science, and there's a good reason for that because that claim doesn't even make sense. People can listen to what I'm saying, and they can go look all of it up. If you do a Google search for the discovery of the worship Gene, then you can probably guess by now what you'll find - absolutely nothing. And if you know anything about genes, then you don't even need to Google it. Every Gene is found in every cell of the human body, so you can't just turn them on and off like that, especially with something like a magnet. Not only can complex human behaviors not be simply correlated with the single Gene, but how on Earth can a magnetic field be so precise as to isolate one single part of each human cell out of 36 trillion of them? The claim simply doesn't make sense. All right, now here's the thing. The problem with Billy's claims is that he seems to use a lot of buzzwords that he doesn't seem to understand as a way to give support to his claims, even when it

comes to non-Christian claims. We see him do this. I don't believe we're even from Earth, to be quite honest with you. Our psychotic rhythm doesn't even match Earth's rotation on its axis. We're slightly off. It's actually better tuned to Mars orbit on its rotation on its own axis. What do you mean? How's that work? The psychotic rhythm of a human body, the wake and sleep cycle, is actually more tuned to Mars rotation on its own axis, a Mars day versus an Earth day. The only problem is you can't find the term psychotic rhythm on Google because it isn't even a thing. Go look all of it up. What he's trying to say is circadian rhythm, but once again he's wrong. Circadian rhythms are basically just referring to the physical, mental, and behavior changes that we go through in a 24-hour day, which, counter to what Billy says, is perfectly suited for humans. And if you just look it up, you realize that there's a mutation in about 1% of humans.

whose cycle includes another half of an hour. So, in other words, their cycle is about 24 and 1/2 hours, making them more fit for Mars's circadian rhythm. So, by now, we can see that he gets facts wrong often, but he's still persuasive to people because of how confidently he asserts things without really knowing what he's talking about. I mean, if this doesn't convince you, then I don't know what will. Yeah, top right B. Okay, you see that where his hand is? I moved to the left, going down slowly. See, see that? See that? Go back up again. See that? What his hand is over right now, it looks like aisk. Sometimes, you can take these images and put them into Photoshop and take away the contrast, and all of a sudden, structures pop right out. But right above that, you see those shadows of those pyramid structures right above that? Yeah, you see those pyramid? See that? You can see this dark shadow. See this? I see two lines. Okay, well, I see the arrow that's pointing to that one straight line and

then I see what looks like two superimposed arrows. Okay, do you see? Yeah, those things. Okay, yeah, those are superimposed, right? Like, no, those are shadows. But look, those are the same things that are in the bottom, aren't they? Just pointing at something. Aren't those pointers? I think they're, they may be highlighting something, right? I think it's curs Mark or so. He believed that he was showing pyramid Shadows on the moon, but in reality, they were really just markers that people punt into the picture to highlight things. And for someone who literally claims to be the best in the world at this, I'm not sure how he can't tell the difference between a marker and an alleged Moon pyramid. Based on Elementary mistakes like this, if I was Joe, I would be incredibly skeptical at whatever else he says as evidence for his claims. So when it comes to Christians being bothered by his claims, here's a couple pieces of advice. The first thing to note is that similar to Terence Howard, he often uses scripture and random jargon out of

context as a way to appear credible and well-studied. And funny enough, ironically, Rogan actually described the problem without even knowing it. Well, there's a lot of dudes, unfortunately, who just get on YouTube, and they listen to very charismatic people talk that don't know what they're talking about, which I do all the time. But they do it in a way where they pretend they know something is true that's not true, and people get sucked into it. Har, get it. Another reason why Christians shouldn't be bothered by what he's saying is because you have to remember that humans also accept or reject beliefs based off of emotional reasons. They aren't always intellectual. In watching his interviews, I came across a clip that might be able to help explain why Billy seems to be particularly focused on refuting the Bible. In this clip, he talks about a traumatic experience that followed from what he believed to be his second encounter with aliens. I had a second experience in 2010, which is well documented. I've talked about it. Took

years to come out about it because I basically lost my whole family over this. And, uh, man, hold on, whoa, sorry, no, no, no, why you have big PR up, you know, lost my family, um, created a lot of dissension. I remember we were on the hobby one day, and my wife was driving at the time, my ex-wife, and she slamming on the brakes and, you know, was like, just get out of, get out of the car, you know, 'cause it was the kids were scared. And I was like, I'm saying, I'm sticking to my story, I'm not changing my story because this really happened to me, and they just didn't want to hear it. But her parents were Jehovah Witnesses, so everything was of the devil, you know. So, it's at least possible that one of the reasons for why he seems to be so set on going against the Bible is because, following these experiences that he believed that he had, the religious people in his life said that it was of the devil and seemed to shun him for it.

and I'm sure that there's a lot more to this story that he didn't mention here. But I wouldn't be shocked if this played a bigger role than we realized in his attacks on Christianity. All right, so what can we take away from all of this? Well, if you find yourself convinced by people like Billy and Terrence Howard, let me just say I get it. In a world where so many of us are skeptical about systems and institutions, people are looking for answers, and people like Terence Howard and Billy Carson, they do a good job of playing into that need. But in reality, they only seem to have the answers since they say a lot of things quickly and confidently. So, if something you hear about Christianity bothers you, no matter who it's from, take the time to study it and hear responses through the claims before you come to conclusions. The internet is filled with bad information, and the popular influencer Snead is another example of this. He gave some new reasons for why he rejected Christianity in favor of Islam that also don't hold up under investigation. So, go

ahead and click here to see what I mean, and I'll see you over there.

How Billy Carsons Misleading MILLIONS On Christianity

Whaddo You Meme??

최근 예수와 기독교에 대한 빌리 카슨의 주장은 수백만 조회수를 기록했지만, 그의 주장은 오해의 소지가 있고 신뢰성이 부족합니다.

예수의 아내를 찾는 책에 대한 그의 주장은 합법적인 발견이 아니라 위조된 파피루스 조각에 근거한 것입니다.

또한 성경의 오역과 예수의 십자가 처형에 대한 그의 주장은 역사적으로 부정확하며 확실한 증거가 부족합니다.

빌리의 성경과 고대 텍스트에 대한 오해

빌리는 고대 텍스트에 대한 전문가라고 주장하지만, 특히 언약궤에 관한 그의 성경 해석은 부정확합니다.

그는 성경을 반증하기 위해 토스의 에메랄드 석판과 같은 모호한 문서를 언급하지만, 그 존재에 대한 증거가 없거나 성경보다 앞선 문서라는 증거는 없습니다.

빌리의 주장은 종종 신뢰할 만한 출처와 증거가 부족하여 그 타당성에 대해 회의적인 시각을 갖게 합니다.

빌리는 에베소서 6장에 나오는 바울의 구절을 언급하면서 예수의 말을 잘못 인용했습니다.

바울의 의도는 혁명을 선동하는 것이 아니라 일반 가정을 다루고 기독교인들이 현재 처한 상황에 대한 지침을 제공하려는 것이었습니다.

엘로힘의 복수형도 단수가 될 수 있고 히브리어 동사는 단수 용법을 나타내므로 "하나님"이라는 단어가 오역되어 "하나님"으로 번역되어야 한다는 주장은 오해의 소지가 있습니다.

오해의 소지가 있는 주장에 대한 비판

발표자는 히브리어가 복수형이라는 주장은 잘못된 것이며 사본에 의해 뒷받침되지 않는다고 주장합니다.

또한 '예배 유전자'라는 개념과 그 유전자가 켜지고 꺼질 수 있다는 주장에 대해 비판하며 그러한 주장의 타당성에 의문을 제기합니다.

연사는 또한 정신병적 리듬이 화성에 더 잘 맞춰져 있다는 생각에 도전하며, 이는 실제로 인간에게 적합한 일주기 리듬에 대한 오해라고 주장합니다.

논란의 여지가 있는 한 인물의 설득력 있지만 오해의 소지가 있는 주장

개체의 주기는 24시간 30분으로 화성의 리듬에 맞는 것처럼 보이지만 종종 사실을 잘못 알고 있습니다.

자신감 넘치는 주장과 구조를 강조하기 위한 이미지 사용은 증거에 대한 오해를 불러일으킵니다.

성경을 반박하는 데 집중하는 것은 외계인과의 만남과 관련된 충격적인 경험에서 비롯된 것일 수 있습니다.

개인적 트라우마가 종교적 신념에 미치는 영향

화자는 자신의 신념으로 인해 가족 상실과 갈등을 경험했고, 이로 인해 성경에 대한 강한 반대를 하게 되었습니다.

전처의 여호와의 증인 신도라는 배경은 그들의 경험을 외면하고 무시하는 데 기여했습니다.

연사는 확신에 찬 영향력 있는 사람들에게 흔들리지 말라고 경고하며 결론을 내리기 전에 시간을 들여 기독교에 대한 주장을 연구하고 조사할 것을 권장합니다.