인간의 일자리를 대체하는 AI: 과대 광고와 현실, 그리고 다가오는 힘의 불균형

### 인공지능이 인간의 일자리를 대체할 것이라는 환상: 비판적 관점
* 🤖 재스퍼 카마이클 잭의 광고 캠페인은 **AI가 인간 노동자를 대체한다는 아이디어**를 홍보하지만, 이 개념은 직장에서의 기술의 복잡성을 지나치게 단순화한다는 회의론에 직면해 있습니다.
* 💼 Gley의 통찰력 있는 논평은 **직원을 AI로 대체하려는 기업은 피해야 할 기업**이고, **인간의 역량을 강화하는 데 집중하는 기업은 성공할 가능성이 더 높다**는 점을 강조합니다.
* 🛠 AI를 소프트웨어 엔지니어를 직접 대체하는 것처럼 묘사하는 것은 **기존 직원을 해고하여 비용을 절감하려는 유혹**을 받을 수 있는 비기술직 경영진을 겨냥한 잘못된 마케팅이라는 비판을 받습니다.
* 💔 현실적으로 GitHub Copilot과 같은 AI 도구는 **대체 도구라기보다는 보조 도구**에 가깝기 때문에 제대로 이해하지 않고 의존하면 상당한 기술 부채와 실망감을 초래할 수 있습니다.
* 📉 AI의 부상은 **새로운 일자리를 창출**할 것으로 기대되지만, 적응하지 못하는 사람들에게는 도전 과제를 안겨주며, 이러한 전환으로 인한 **잠재적 실직과 정신 건강에 미치는 영향**에 대한 우려도 제기되고 있습니다.
* 💡 AI의 장점도 있지만, AI가 보편적으로 삶을 개선할 것이라는 생각은 **전통적인 일자리가 줄어들고 많은 사람이 자신의 일에서 목적을 찾는 세상**에서 모든 사람이 성공할 수 있는 것은 아니라는 사실을 간과하고 있습니다.
* ⚖ 궁극적으로 소수의 기술 리더에게 권력이 집중되면 **AI 발전의 진정한 수혜자가 누구인지에 대한 윤리적 의문**이 제기되며, 기술에 대한 통제권이 더 큰 불평등으로 이어질 수 있는 미래를 암시합니다.
* 🔍 이 논의는 기술이 발전할수록 유토피아적인 사회가 아니라 **소수의 개인이 다수의 삶에 더 많은 권력을 행사하는 현실**로 이어질 수 있다는 광범위한 우려를 반영합니다.

AI가 고용 시장에 미치는 영향은 복잡하며, 근로자에게 새로운 기회와 중대한 과제를 동시에 창출합니다.

Did you actually see this Jasper Carmichael Jack's ad campaign? To stop hiring humans and use AI instead. So I thought I saw this on the internet.  Artisans won't complain about work-life balance. The era of AI employees is here. The homeless person next to it is a...

really nice touch. Yeah, the dichotomy between these two is just so good. I think this was Gley who said this on Twitter, and I think he did a really good job, which is that the companies and the places that say they want to replace people with AI are the ones you want to

run from. The places and the people that say they want to try to make people faster or get to solutions quicker are much more likely to be the ones that actually win. So this is probably comparing the difference between Devon, the one that claims to be a software

engineer, versus uh, Cursor, which claims to be an editor that's going to help you. Oh, there we go. It continues to sit poorly with me that this company is advertising its LLM product as a direct replacement for software engineers, calling it an "AI software engineer." This

is sleazy marketing targeting non-technical CEOs and execs, suggesting they can replace devs with it, which we all watched what happened when I tried to use it. Um, in reality, the product is a sidekick for software engineers, and one that has long iteration cycles. Here's a

review of the actual dev. Yeah, this is one that's reviewed for me. Even non-long-form versions of these videos aren't good enough, right? Like this is only 9 minutes. I just don't think this is good enough to actually show you what it really, really is like.

Like, you need to see and experience what the pain actually is. Where you actually make it do bigger projects and try to get it to do anything, and you will watch it just fizzle apart. I suspect that we'll see more claims from AI startups saying

they are a one-to-one replacement for jobs and more, suggesting that they can replace devs. This is because GitHub Copilot backed most of them in a corner with a $20 a month product that works pretty well. Yeah, GitHub Copilot's actually pretty amazing, still to this

day. I just, for me, I just quit using it again because I just feel like I lose some of my ability to learn new languages really quickly. I feel like I get this weird, like, syntax fuzziness in my head about how

things work. Uh, mainstream media will, for a while, end up eating this or eat up this narrative. Non-technical CEOs will flock and pay $500 a month per agent and assume they can now fire existing staff. Then they get disappointed when they realize how this, uh, how this

or how it's not... oh my God, how it's not how it works. Oh my gosh, I got dyslexia for a second. Hold on, let me... this... this 'sex' daily gets in my head every now and then. Then they get disappointed when realizing how it's not how this works. Oh my gosh, I can't

read! I can't read! I'm actually stupid. This is what an AI gold rush looks like. Uh, I actually really like this take because I think what people forget is there's this whole thing called legacy, and legacy is what happens right after your AI makes something and somebody

needs not only to take that change, but also to take that change in the perspective of all the other changes. Now, the context window of an AI is not nearly large enough to be able to make those decisions at any sort of level that's wise enough. This is a great take.

Which is, there are going to be—I think he's perfectly right on this, by the way—all these non-technical CEOs that are just going to go off and hire this $500-a-month… oh, it's only $8 an hour, of course I would want this…and fire people

because of it. I think it's absolutely crazy, and in reality, it's going to actually probably tank their product because their product's going to go, 'Oh wow, we got a…' and then their features are going to just grind to a halt; things aren't going to work nearly as well, and

then what's going to happen? It's just going to suck. Immediate tech debt right off the rip. None of these things work the way that you think they're going to work, right? I can't wait for the AI craze to die. I don't think it's going to die

anytime soon because I still think we've got another iteration after this, into the next model, that's going to promise big change, and the big change isn't going to…it's going to result in the exact same thing that we just got done seeing, right? AI-powered AI

powered product. Yeah. When I see this thing right here, this is an advertisement for non-technical people to be baited into this, because you must—you absolutely have to understand that, again, LLMs work by taking the input token and attempting to produce the

Most likely output that would result from this input. Like, that's not a great way to program, right? Like, that's not going to produce the program that you're probably going to want. Programming is not the most likely character or token afterwards; that's

just how you don't produce good programs. That's how you produce programs that don't even work. That's why APIs get like, made up so often, because it is like the most likely sounding correct thing coming out; it doesn't mean it actually is the correct thing coming out. Anyways,

this dude, the era of AI employees is here? It's not here; it is like not here at all. I think what we are... we are in the... we are in the era of realizing that text prediction is pretty cool. I think that's the era that we're in, and text

prediction is pretty cool. Like, you have to admit, me having a talk with Devin and it producing something that is like really cool, comparatively to what has ever been, it's really cool. But it is not an employee; it's not great; it's not solving all these

problems; it's not anything that they're promising. That's a huge difference between the two. I wish people would just understand this. This is the era of AI/ML jobs being available. Uh, I am proof of that.

You are true. Yeah, very true.  Have you tried 01 Pro? I haven't bought 01 Pro, but I will buy that next. I'm sad about the developer sitting on the side of this ad. I know this web developer, Devin. In fact, this actually reminds me of something else. There was... um... I wanted to look at this because I...

I haven't seen this yet, but this falls under the exact same thing that just kind of dropped. People will lose jobs; many new jobs will be created, I think, much better jobs. Uh, we feel a responsibility to educate society as we see it. We'll be right about some things,

wrong about others, uh, and to be as good as we can being stewards of this technology. But you know, not everyone's going to like all of the impacts, but this is coming. This is like...this is a scientific achievement of humanity that is going to get embedded in everything.

We do...the definition of work changes. You know, someone that lived thousands of years ago that was trying to be like a subsistence farmer probably would look at what you and I do now and say that's not really work; they're just having fun. I think it will be so clear once these

robots are off doing all of these other things that there's some special human things, and we don't really care that much what those robots do in the same way that, you know, we don't care that much about the machines in factories making stuff for us, right? But

we'll find stuff to do that we really care about. I...I always think it's a little bit weird how kind of cavalier people are about this. This change is going to cause a lot of people a lot of difficulty. Yeah, it's not as sane as

it was portrayed, because I didn't look...I didn't listen to it, but to me it's still very crazy that they're just like, yeah, people are going to lose their jobs, but this is good. What we're...what we're creating is good. People are going to

lose their jobs. I mean, there's a lot of people that will not be able to cope with the new world. Yeah, but he's right, it's good... I don't know if it's good. I don't know if that's good. I have no

idea. Like, I think if we largely looked at the internet, I'm not convinced that the internet has made people's lives amazingly better, right? Like, I don't know. Right? Like, I think that we also have a huge... we have like a mental

health crisis through the roof. Like, I can't say we can say that technology has been purely great. There's a lot of great things about technology. Like, I'm not a fool. I'm not one of those people that think that we should all return to

the Stone Age. Like, I will say that we largely don't have... we don't have to die from such stupid things anymore. Like, there's a lot of great things that have come with it, but not all things are great. And one thing we haven't lost thus far is the

ability to work. And I know a lot of... I know this is kind of a controversial one, but the ability to work is a very important thing. You see people who can't work, who don't have the ability to work, it really hurts them. It really hurts

them, right? Like, it hurts those people in huge ways. And the thing is, is like... I'll be like, oh yeah, well, I'll just be able to critically think and build whatever I want. Not everybody can just do whatever they want. There are a lot of people that

don't have the mental capacity to just build whatever they want whenever they want, and Ubi giving them money doesn't solve the problem of not being able to be out there working and doing something, gaining a life, right? Like, there are people in the city that I live in

there are programs for people who have a difficult time with mental health problems. There are various stores aligned for hiring people with these disabilities so they can come in, work, and have

meaningful interactions with people, and it really breaks them out of their shell, allowing them to be in a much better position in life. That's a real thing, and these kinds of things destroy that. I'm not saying there aren't

going to be a lot of awesome things, but I'm also not convinced it's going to be all good, right? This kind of utopian thought that everything will be great once the robots can do everything... I just don't think so, right? I just don't

think that's good. People feel terrified when their lives change, but actually it may just be a better place; it may also be a worse place. You've got to remember that... what is the underlying thing that happens here? What's the underlying thing that happens here? Let's just say that

Sam, Samuel, Samuel Jippy Alment is 100% correct. What is the underlying thing that happens here? Samuel J. Alment is king of everybody; he owns the software that everybody has to live off of. He is ultimately the richest, most powerful person, and he decides what is right.

And, wrong. And he is able to control effectively a huge portion of the world. Okay, it's not like, 'Oh, everything's great.' It's more like, 'Actually, there's one person, or his group of people, that it's really, really great for.' Overlord Sam will be the guy, whoever

owns it, will be the guy, right? They get to play God among men. All I see is that more power is condensing. 100 years ago, more people had more say over their lives. Now that power is being more and more condensed. It's... it's actually the chapter

three of... uh, there's a book called *The Abolition of Man*, and chapter three is all about how the escape from nature is just really a power struggle between a few people who actually wield the power, and a bunch of people who are disillusioned that they actually retain

the power over nature. And it really is this smaller and smaller and smaller world in which fewer and fewer people actually have the real power, because you and I don't have the power to escape nature; we purchase that power from other people, which is very interesting. So,

people think we all live greater than nature and all that. No, we are completely dependent on it; we just simply purchase it from other people. So it's a... it's a weird world to live in where fewer and fewer people get

to make decisions for more and more people. I don't know, that's my... that's my whole take on this.

The AI Employee Era Has Begun

This is a place for all the things that are awesome on stream. 

ThePrimeTime

AI 기반 일자리 대체 마케팅에 대한 비판

인간 직원보다 AI를 홍보하는 광고 캠페인에 대해 논의합니다.

인간을 AI로 대체하는 기업을 부정적으로 바라보는 시선도 있습니다.

AI 도구 비교: Devon(소프트웨어 엔지니어) 대 Cursor(편집자).

AI를 소프트웨어 엔지니어를 직접 대체하는 것으로 마케팅하는 것에 대한 비판이 있습니다.

AI 도구는 엔지니어를 위한 조력자라는 표현이 더 정확합니다.

짧은 동영상으로는 AI의 한계를 보여주기에는 충분하지 않습니다.

AI가 고용 시장과 학습에 미치는 영향에 대한 우려

깃허브 코파일럿이 AI 스타트업과 일자리 대체 주장에 미치는 영향.

AI 도구를 사용할 때 학습 능력이 저하되는 개인적인 경험.

기술 전문가가 아닌 CEO가 AI 역량을 과대평가하는 예측.

AI의 컨텍스트 창과 레거시 시스템의 한계에 대해 논의합니다.

AI 구현의 장기적 결과와 권력 역학 관계

비기술적인 CEO가 비현실적인 AI 기대치를 근거로 직원을 해고하는 것에 대한 우려.

성급한 AI 통합이 제품 개발에 미칠 수 있는 부정적인 영향.

지속적인 AI 과대 광고 주기 및 유사한 결과 예측.

LLM의 작동 방식과 프로그래밍의 한계에 대해 설명합니다.

현재 시대는 텍스트 예측 기능이 중요시되는 시대입니다.

AI의 광범위한 사회적 영향과 업무의 미래

AI 발전으로 인한 일자리 소멸과 창출에 대한 논의.

AI의 영향력에 대한 사회 교육에 중점을 둡니다.

삶의 다양한 측면에 내재된 과학적 성과로서의 AI.

시대에 따라 업무의 정의가 달라지고 있습니다.

일자리 이동에 대한 무심한 태도에 대한 우려.

기술 및 AI의 전반적인 영향에 대한 우려

인터넷이 사람들의 삶에 미치는 전반적인 긍정적인 영향에 대해 질문합니다.

기술의 긍정적인 측면을 인정하는 동시에 부정적인 측면도 인정합니다.

업무 능력의 중요성과 정신 건강에 미치는 영향.

모든 사람이 자신만의 작품을 만들 수 있는 능력을 갖춘 것은 아닙니다.

정신건강에 어려움을 겪는 사람들에게 의미 있는 일자리를 제공하는 프로그램의 중요성.

AI 기술을 통제하는 사람들의 손에 권력이 집중되는 것에 대해 논의합니다.

단일 단체 또는 그룹이 삶의 중요한 측면을 통제할 수 있는 잠재력.

시간이 지남에 따라 전력 집중도가 증가하는 것을 관찰했습니다.

자연을 통제하기 위한 권력 투쟁과 관련된 *인간 폐지*를 참조하세요.

다른 사람에 대한 자원 의존도와 이러한 역학 관계의 의미에 대해 논의합니다.