블로그 및 콘텐츠 제작에서의 AI 활용과 과제

AI를 글쓰기에 사용하려면 감독 및 법적 문제를 피하기 위해 책임감 있는 파일럿이 필요합니다.

### 검색 엔진의 불이익을 받지 않고 블로그에서 AI를 사용하는 방법
* 🔍 블로거는 AI를 사용하여 글을 작성할 때 자신의 글이 **검색 엔진에서 누락**되는 것을 우려합니다.
* ❓ 블로그에서 **AI를 사용하는 문제는 복잡**하기 때문에 간단하게 답할 수 없습니다.
* 💬 이 문제에 대한 반응은 온라인 커뮤니티에서 다양하게 나타나고 있으며, 일부에서는 **누락을 보고하는**가 하면 **아무런 문제가 없다는 의견**도 있습니다.
* ✈ AI를 사용하여 블로그 게시물을 작성할 때는 **주 역할이 아닌 보조 역할**로 취급하는 것이 중요합니다.
* 🔒 Google은 혼란이나 불법 행위로 이어질 수 있는 **AI 콘텐츠와 관련된 문제**를 파악하고 해결하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다.
* 🛡 AI 오용을 완전히 차단하기는 어렵지만 **Adobe Stock과 같은 플랫폼에서는 생성 AI 툴의 사용을 관리하기 위한 조치**를 취하고 있습니다.
* 🚫 AI가 생성한 콘텐츠가 검색 환경을 방해하거나 저작권을 침해하거나 불법 행위를 포함하는 경우 **제재가 가해질 수 있습니다.**
* 📈 GPT와 같은 AI 도구를 활용하려면 **블로거는 블로그 게시물 작성에 대한 지식과 경험**이 있어야 합니다.

Hello, this is Sang-yang Jobs. Today, I will talk about AI-related issues that many people are worried about recently. What concerns people the most is that when they write AI articles or do something related to AI, they are afraid of being overlooked. The viewers of my channel are mostly bloggers, so they are most concerned about whether their blog posts will be omitted from search engines. However, this question is not something that can be answered simply. You need to look into it more closely. The problem is whether using AI is the issue itself. But most people who ask questions or write blogs dream of gaining exposure without lifting a finger and without putting in much effort. They want to use AI like GPT to write and make a profit effortlessly, but it doesn't work that way. They are concerned about such things. These are the kinds of questions that are being discussed in group chat rooms.

If you look into online communities, you will find that the answers are very diverse. Some people say, I used AI, but there were omissions. I have used it a lot, but there are always omissions. Some say, I am doing well with AI profits, so it doesn't matter at all. The reason for such diverse responses is, first, there are answers that cannot be proven. Like my blog, nobody reveals the blog itself or the data. It's just a high possibility of what people are saying. Another reason is that the way of writing through AI that each blog uses is different. When MS released their AI, they used the word copilot to disclose it. Copilot is a role that assists the pilot. In fact, there is no problem with continuously writing in this way. Writing in a copilot manner is an unstoppable method that no one can refuse. But the copilot is

No, a pilot is the one who flies the plane, after drinking a lot, without sobering up, talking to friends, playing games, etc. Is it okay to leave the control to them? No, but most people who are now starting to blog with the help of AI tend to take this approach. With the assistance of AI, the pilot must fly well. So, whether you received help from GPT or shared the video with the members first, the video you received a lot of help from will be very helpful. If you look at the comments, you will know. If you write with the help of this method, there won't be a big problem unless there is a mistake. So, when dealing with AI, you must treat them as assistants. You should treat them as assistants, not as the main role, when checking the final results or writing.

How to use it is up to you in the end, so you have to do the output. So, do you not question AI itself on Google or search engines, including YouTube, which is owned by Google? However, what's scary is that I want to verify whether it's AI or not. For example, when I upload a video to YouTube, various tabs are displayed. Among them, there is a tab called Modified Content at the bottom. Here, it asks if there is a description that applies to my content. It is made to look like a real person has said or done something that hasn't actually happened, or to alter videos of actual events or places that didn't actually occur or to create scenes that look real. This involves many areas that are still difficult to handle through AI or other tools.

I am asked to answer directly whether it is included or not, so I will answer all with no. What Google wants to know now is whether it is a response or not. When you look into it in detail, various contents come out. Within this, there is now an introduction to the use of changed or synthesized content. This is now to create a basis, so Google is saying that I am checking. But what they actually want to know is whether it was created by AI or not. They can know by hearing our answer. If we don't answer, what will happen? They will find out on their own. Now, there is a battle between sword and shield, or a battle between shield and sword, but Google is continuing its efforts for them to find out on their own. Whether it is AI or not, to identify and address the issues. However, videos that were not created through AI are the same, just like those created through AI.

In the midst of that, it can cause confusion or generate things like fakes, or things that are morally or legally illegal, especially in the case of AI. It is for the purpose of imposing sanctions. Nowadays, AI videos and texts are so perfect that it's hard for the general public to distinguish. The same goes for voices. Recently, I've been constantly listening to AI voices. In a state where the performance has improved to the point where it can be used without distinction, I judged that it could cause confusion. Therefore, on YouTube, when it is indicated as such, it is separately marked as such. Even if it is not indicated as such, if we find them, we will mark and impose sanctions. This is not about imposing sanctions on AI unconditionally, but they want to know. We can judge whether we have AI, but we are not sure. Nowadays, the same goes for photos, texts, and Catch PT requests.

You know, I need this right now. Please make it for me. How do I insert a prompt there without revealing that it's AI? Put elements in here like this. Then it performs. This is a really difficult issue. In fact, it's an unstoppable issue, so we need to accept it to some extent and move towards managing it by being accepted by search engines or companies. These things are starting to emerge more and more these days. Shall I give you another example? I upload and sell videos on Adobe Stock. It's been quite a while, but a checkbox has appeared in the place where I use generative AI tools. When you check the box for using generative AI tools for creation, it doesn't mean you can't upload or sell. It means that Adobe will also manage this. So, through the use of generative AI for creation, in practice, it's for artists or specific.

If problems arise to the extent that they can cause confusion at actual locations, that would be illegal and could be a problem for those who hold actual copyrights. This means that we will check those things. Even according to what Adobe said, do not submit products that reference or are based on individuals, places, or properties. If you do not own the copyright to any individuals, places, or properties, we can still create. For example, Starbucks, Nike, Hyundai, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, etc. are things we can create prompts based on. It's a warning not to do it. In the case of an artist's work, there are some very famous works, especially in the case of photos. If you use prompts well in such cases, the prompts we are talking about here are for conducting PT conversations. If you have a good conversation, even if I am not that artist, I can create in their style.

I can create music, videos, and photos. This is a story of don't do it. We cannot block this 100% like Adobe impostors or Google-like places because of technical limitations. Our AI is smart, and their AI is smart too, that's why. When those things are done, we will impose sanctions. We are suggesting a statement like this. So, coming back to our topic, when writing a blog post, using AI to write or recently, Chaebol PT Dalli creates great photos. I have a thumbnail now. This thumbnail is my design. I did all of this with Chaebol PTro. When doing these things, Google does not necessarily omit it. No, it doesn't omit it. However, if it disrupts the search environment, infringes on copyright, or involves illegal activities, we will impose sanctions just like when we don't use AI.

The person who posts this article or uploads a video, if not made public by the person who uploads it, Google will be in a lot of trouble. So when you upload, in the case of platforms like YouTube, make sure to indicate that, then they will manage it. You can consider it at that level. Since the activation of AI from the beginning, I have been paying for everything, especially I am directly involved in various affiliate systems on blogs and YouTube, as well as selling videos or photos through Adobe Stock, Shutterstock, etc. So I mentioned that the changes are clearly visible. So, you don't need to worry too much about using AI. But if there is a comprehensive omission, it is important for you to reflect on how you used it. If a pilot does not perform the role of a pilot, does not pay the pilot's salary, and assigns as much work as a pilot to the co-pilot, then that is subject to sanctions.

So, in fact, I introduce AI to you a lot, but I haven't introduced much about Cha Ji-tee. There is a reason for that. If I introduce this, you all have that desire. Ah, now if I just move a finger, I can write a blog post of 2,000 or 3,000 characters. I can easily write about topics I don't know and make a lot of profit through AdSense. But that's not the case. You need to know how to write a blog and actually have the experience of making money through a blog to benefit from Cha Ji-tee. With it, you can write five, ten, or twenty posts a day. If it took you two days to study something you didn't know well, you can finish it in an hour. This is how you can do it. So, because such negative aspects can easily infiltrate you, my GPT utilization is...

I am currently pushing back a bit. Is there anything I can do? No, right? When the time comes, now that I have given you a little opportunity, I will leave it to you how to utilize GPT. There will come a time when I will reveal in detail how to use PowerPoint and write using AI. Until then, I hope you will take responsibility for steering the blog and writing as a pilot. You asked a lot of questions about AI, so I briefly answered, and I will meet you in another video. Alright, then I will stop here for today. This was Isahyung D cho con quala D sea papi boyeo con quala D sea papi Bo con qu se con qu SE.

ai 블로그 포스팅 써주는 글쓰기 자동화 구글 검색엔진 누락될까?

디지털 노마드 상상이 아니라 현실로 가능합니다. 처음부터 맨땅에 헤딩하시면서 하는건 굉장히 힘든일이고 대부분 포기하게 될 수 있습니다.

아직 블루오션인 이 세계에 하루라도 빨리 함께 하시고 직장에 따른 주거지 선택이 아니라 원하는 휴양지를 골라서 거주하는 꿈을 이루시길 바랍니다. 

멤버십 가입 링크 : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9iuBucKC2GGkJNcgKSzGaw/join
(아이폰등 모바일에서는 가입 버튼이 안보인다고 하는데요 혹시 잘 아시는 분은 정보좀 부탁드려요^^)

비즈니스 문의: e4yangjops@gmail.com
❈ "전자책 링크"는 통보 없이 삭제합니다


이사양잡스

글쓰기에 AI를 사용하는 블로거의 우려 사항

많은 블로거가 자신이 만든 AI 콘텐츠가 검색 엔진에서 간과될까 봐 걱정하고 있습니다.

손쉽게 수익을 창출하기 위해 AI를 활용하는 것은 블로거들의 공통된 욕구이며, 온라인 커뮤니티 내에서 다양한 경험과 의견으로 이어지고 있습니다.

블로거는 콘텐츠의 품질과 효과를 보장하기 위해 AI를 주된 역할이 아닌 보조적인 역할로 취급하는 것이 중요합니다.

AI가 생성한 콘텐츠가 플랫폼에 미치는 영향

Google은 YouTube에서 '수정된 콘텐츠' 탭을 사용하여 AI가 생성하거나 변경한 콘텐츠를 식별하고, 해당 콘텐츠의 사용에 대한 직접적인 대응을 모색하고 있습니다.

실제 콘텐츠와 구별하기 어려울 수 있는 AI 생성 콘텐츠로 인해 발생하는 문제를 해결하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다.

Google은 혼란과 불법 활동을 방지하고 플랫폼에서의 사용 범위를 파악하기 위해 AI 생성 콘텐츠에 표시를 하고 제재를 가하고 있습니다.

콘텐츠 제작에 제너레이티브 AI 도구 사용하기: 알아야 할 사항

특히 특정 아티스트나 사진작가의 스타일과 유사한 콘텐츠를 제작할 때는 이러한 툴을 책임감 있게 사용하는 것이 중요합니다.

음악, 동영상, 사진 제작에 AI 활용하기

음악, 동영상, 사진 제작에 AI가 활용되고 있지만 사칭자를 차단하는 데는 기술적 한계가 있습니다.

사용자는 포괄적인 제재를 피하기 위해 자신의 AI 사용에 대해 반성하는 것이 좋습니다.

차지티와 함께하는 블로그 글쓰기와 수익 창출의 중요성

차지티를 사용하면 하루에 여러 개의 블로그 게시물을 작성하고 낯선 주제를 빠르게 다룰 수 있습니다.

이 도구를 유용하게 사용하려면 블로그 경험과 수익 창출에 대한 지식이 필요합니다.

이사형 작가는 GPT의 책임감 있는 사용의 필요성을 강조하며 향후 글쓰기에 AI를 활용하는 방법에 대한 가이드를 제공할 것을 약속합니다.