AI 아트 공모전: 저작권 문제와 논란

AI 창작물은 예술계의 전통적인 저작자 및 저작권 개념에 도전합니다.

### 미술 대회에서의 인공지능 논란: 창의성의 새로운 시대
* 🤖 최근 제이슨 앨런은 콜로라도에서 열린 미술 대회에서 **인공지능으로 제작한 작품**을 출품해 **대상을 수상**하며 창작 분야에서 인공지능의 역할에 대한 논쟁을 불러일으켰습니다.
* 🎨 수상작은 **달을 바라보는 여성의 미묘한 분위기**를 묘사한 작품으로, 사람이 그린 작품이라고는 믿기 어려울 정도입니다.
* 💰 Allen은 AI 도구인 Midjourney를 통해 생성된 **900개 이상의 이미지**를 제출하여 최종적으로 **3개를 선정**했고, 그 노력의 대가로 **300달러의 상금**을 받았습니다.
* 😡 많은 아티스트들이 **"인공지능이 대회에 참가하는 것은 말이 안 된다!"** 등의 반응을 보이며 인공지능의 대회 참가에 대한 공정성에 의문을 제기하며 분노를 표했습니다.
* 📜 현행 저작권법은 사람이 만든 저작물만 인정하고 있어 **카카오브레인의 인공지능이 쓴 시집**에서 보듯 인공지능 창작물의 지위는 법적 회색지대에 놓여 있습니다.
* 🔍 국가 지적 재산권 위원회는 **AI로 생성된 저작물의 복잡성과 법적 개혁의 잠재적 필요성**을 해결하기 위한 방법을 모색하고 있습니다.
* ⚖ 인공지능 창작물에 저작권을 부여해야 하는지, 아니면 **인공지능 기술을 개발한 사람이나 기업에게 저작권**을 부여해야 하는지에 대한 논의가 진행 중입니다.
* 🕰 AI가 계속 발전하고 창작 분야에서 인정을 받으면서 예술계는 곧 **저작자와 저작권에 관한 중요한 결정**에 직면할 수 있습니다.

It's time to finally announce the main character of the last subject. The winner of the grand cost of submitting three works. AI. Huh? How does artificial intelligence win prizes; No way. No. It makes sense. Recently, a person who submitted a work made by artificial intelligence at an art competition in Colorado, USA, won the grand prize. If you don't tell me the painting with a subtle atmosphere as if women were gathering and looking at the moon, I would believe it even if it was painted by a human. The competition ended without reversing the award because there were no direct guidelines for submitting creative works using AI. Jason Allen, the winner, also revealed the process of submitting works made with AI through SNS. More than 900 images created with the drawing AI Midjoany / Tuning and curating to select 3 favorite works / With an AI called 'Gigapixel' that has improved the image prize will be given an 11-dollar congratulations on the

resolution, submitted by Allen, who received $300 in prize money for $750 each. Many artists were angry at Allen's move. This is what AI drew, man drew? Does it make sense for AI to participate in the competition?!!! You've done nothing, you're brazen!!! It is clearly unclear whether the author of AI creations, who creates dozens of images in minutes, is a human being. It wasn't really a job to make a piece with AI. It's an AI called Midgenie that Allen used. You can use AI if you sign up for this channel through an app called Discord. You can create text for creating images by typing slash imagine in the chat window. I will try to create an image in my own way while thinking about the picture that Allen created. First, there was an opera theater. It was like a moon out of the window, creating four pairs of images that are associated with text. If you're going to extract the image, you can click the button

that starts with U, and if you want to change the image, you can click the button that starts with V. I will change number 1 once. Of these four pairs, I chose number 3. We also improved the quality by utilizing various functions related to the scale of the image. Yes, I've pulled out the picture like this. I really liked it personally. There's something very full here on the moon, and from now on, this is mine. (Maintaining a terrible concept) Images are often registered with captions, so the amount of learning data is enormous, so the image created based on text is very mature. It is not strange that AI wins and wins people because it is possible to create such paintings by learning various styles. Oh, this. Everyone who's tempted is normal. Apart from the quality of the image implemented by AI, whether to view AI creations as works or AI users as authors is still a problem with no answer. When I think about the labor that goes into a piece of art, I wonder if I could say that a human made a work that was made with

AI, but if I think about AI in the category of creative tools like a brush or a design program, I think I can recognize humans as authors. In Allen's case, AI created hundreds of pictures, but when you think about it, it was Allen who came up with the best comment to use at the command prompt, tuned hundreds of images in a better direction, and picked out only the good images. Similar stories began to emerge on the surface as various AI creations came out in Korea. Recently, Kakao Brain collected poems written by AI Sia and published a collection of poems, Why I Write Poetry, but failed to register copyright. This is because under the current copyright law, only works made by 'humans' are recognized as works. It is awkward to exclude the existence of AI and apply the enacted law to the creations created by AI. Among the free music sources used in YouTube videos, there are quite a few songs composed by AI. This is an ironic situation in which AI creations are permeating

into our daily lives, but no one claims copyright on them. The National Intellectual Property Committee has set up a special AI-Intellectual Property Committee in preparation for the future when AI creations flood and is discussing matters related to 16 related ministries, including the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and the Korean Intellectual Property Office. Although discussions took place for two years after the first and second terms of the committee, there are still many concerns to continue until the enactment of the law. It is unclear who should be the subject of copyright for AI creations, and the position of stakeholders involved in AI creations is different. Currently, producers of AI creations, who do not recognize copyrights, claim that they invest in technology, but their willingness to study technology is low because they do not make profits, while consumers of AI creations have to pay for the many AI creations they used for free if they recognize copyrights. It's also unclear to what extent the rights are protected. At the current level of technology, copyright can be granted at a weaker level than pure human creations in consideration of many things, but considering that more

sophisticated creations are mass-produced at the future level of technology. It would not make sense to grant copyrights to all those creations, and it would be appropriate to exclude them from the protection at all. Recently, the National Intellectual Property Committee recommended that AI-intellectual property, humans, or corporations that have contributed to the creation of AI be attributed to copyright, and that the copyright law should be revised so that they can be exempted from using works when using big data. I understand that related ministries agree on the recommendations and will conduct various reviews based on them. It is too complicated to enact the relevant law right now, so we will continue to conduct related research, refer to various overseas cases, and keep an eye on the situation. I think it was only yesterday that AlphaGo made a splash in Korea in 2016. Given that AI has been on the art competition list for six years, it seems that it will not be long before a difficult decision is made. Please watch the video that the producer who made this video recommends.

If you want to enjoy other videos of Subnews, please press the subscribe button.

AI가 그린 그림이 미술대회 1등해서 난리난 미술계 근황 / 스브스뉴스

✔ 뉴스에는 위아래가 없다, 스브스뉴스

SBS디지털뉴스랩 크리에이티브 사업부문이
스브스뉴스, 문명특급, 오목교 전자상가 등을 기획하고 제작했던 노하우로
기업, 브랜드 유튜브 채널에 대한 분석, 컨설팅, 기획/제작을 도와드립니다.

[뉴미디어 터줏대감이 직접 하는 컨설팅!]

기업/브랜드 자체 채널 컨설팅 및 기획/제작 문의: solution@sbs.co.kr
스브스뉴스 브랜디드 콘텐츠 문의: branded@sbs.co.kr



스브스뉴스 SUBUSUNEWS

논란의 여지가 있는 인공지능의 미술 대회 우승

콜로라도에서 열린 한 미술 대회에서 인공지능이 만든 작품을 출품한 제이슨 앨런이 대상을 수상했습니다.

여성들이 모여 달을 바라보는 모습을 그린 이 우승작은 사람의 작품으로 착각할 정도로 설득력이 있었습니다.

앨런의 인공지능 도구 사용과 출품작에 대한 명확한 가이드라인의 부재는 예술가들 사이에서 분노를 불러일으켰고, 창작 대회에서 인공지능의 역할에 대한 의문을 제기했습니다.

이미지와 예술 창작에 미치는 AI의 영향

AI 이미지 제작은 다양한 스타일을 학습하고 고품질 이미지를 생성할 수 있는 능력으로 정교해졌습니다.

AI 창작물을 예술 작품으로 볼 것인지, 아니면 AI 사용자를 작가로 볼 것인지에 대한 논쟁은 여전히 해결되지 않고 있습니다.

서브뉴스는 구독 버튼을 눌러 시청자가 더 많은 동영상을 즐길 수 있도록 초대합니다.