편지 편지: 우정의 배신과 실망

### 감정적 발언 비판과 개인적인 거부감
* 🇺🇦 화자는 **발레라가 전투 장교에서 선전가로 변신**한 것을 비판합니다.
* 🛬 이 친구는 **러시아 비행기에 대한 우크라이나 영공 폐쇄, 국경에서의 난민 학대 등 다양한 문제**에 대해 발레라가 침묵하고 있다고 강조합니다.
* 🇵🇱 이 친구는 왜 발레라가 **러시아인에 대한 국경과 항구 폐쇄, 경제 영향, 인도주의적 문제 발생 등 폴란드의 조치에 반대하는 목소리**를 내지 않았는지 의문을 제기합니다.
* 💔 친구는 **"발레라, 난 더 이상 널 친구로 생각하지 않아"**라며 개인적인 실망과 거부를 표현합니다.
* 👥 이 친구는 **1994년 대회에서 두 사람이 함께 했던 군대 생활과 우정의 제스처**를 회상하며 발레라의 현재 행동과 대비를 이룹니다.
* 🤔 친구는 발레라의 진위를 의심하며 **"94년과 22년 중 언제 진짜였냐"**고 묻습니다.
* 🇷🇺 발레라의 친구는 **벨라루스 정부가 우크라이나와의 전쟁을 원하지 않으며 주권과 영토 보전을 지키고 있다**고 주장하며 벨라루스 정부의 행동을 옹호합니다.
* 🤝 이 친구는 발레라가 중국, 파키스탄 등과 같은 **'진보적 국가'의 지지**를 언급하지 않았다고 비판하며 발레라가 **대중의 인정을 받기 위해 수년 동안 변**했다고 제안합니다.

발레라의 친구는 실망감을 표하고 여러 가지 중요한 문제에 대한 그의 침묵에 의문을 제기하며 결국 두 사람의 우정은 끝이 납니다.

Hi Valera, we have been friends for more than twenty-eight years. I watched this emotional speech and tried several times to find some justification from your side for such a heroic act. A combat officer turned into an ordinary propagandist. I found it strange that you were silent when the plane landing in Ukraine happened. Not even the European Union, but Ukraine closed its airspace to our planes. Why was there no similar emotional speech? I didn't understand why you remained silent when refugees were being mistreated at the border, who could have created a humanitarian corridor. They weren't asking to go to Poland; they wanted to go to Germany, to Canada, and nothing prevented the Polish government from doing that. Moreover, I don't understand why a friendly state, a brotherly Slavic nation, closed its borders and ports to our people.

Causing damage to the economy of a friendly country that supplies electricity, I don't understand why you remained silent and did not express outrage for eight years when people were being killed in Donbas and Luhansk—13,000 dead. And these were not military personnel like in Afghanistan; these were children, women, and the elderly. Those who fought against Nazism from '41 to '45 cannot be compared to this. I want to take you back to '94 when we participated in field training competitions among battalion commanders and their deputies. I won't say now who won or lost; we both know that well. We became friends there, two pillars deeply devoted to our homeland and the service to our country. At the final stage of the competition, you suggested that the infantry and paratroopers move the tables. At that time, you said wonderful words: A paratrooper will never give up his striped shirt, beret, or military ID. You took off your striped shirt and gave it to me.

I was proud of this even when I was in command. I swam in Vardane in this striped shirt, which I only wore when I felt bad or heavy. Everyone around you, including me, helped you when you found yourself in a difficult situation. Even after your dismissal, I did everything possible for you to receive the military rank of Colonel in reserve. Was I really mistaken? You understand that earning cheap populism is very easy for those people to whom you addressed and said that this is not a staged video. Maybe someone believed it, but those are amateurs. When filming is done from multiple angles, and you motivate with figures that you couldn't possibly know about after being dismissed from the armed forces at 18, you didn't mention anything about the killed or what was happening there, except for what Western intelligence services could present to you. You called for conscience and honor, which you speak of, but you shouldn't have recalled your past merits. You should have started honestly. I have preserved the memory of this for a long time.

I work in Poland, and I have a business here. They cornered me and said, Either you perform, or your business is finished. That would have been honest. And now, Valera, I don't consider you my friend anymore. Everyone deserves a chance to make a mistake. You said a wonderful phrase: a person is given the right to make a serious choice only once in life, and we made that choice when we decided to go to military school. You went to Moscow, and I went to Omsk. I don't know which school you attended, but at least it wasn't Omsk, where they teach you not to fulfill your oath, to run from the army, and not to obey the demands of commanders and superiors. This is a game about why you are calling in your address. You know, I want to ask you one question when we meet: when were you real, back in '94 or now in '22? It seems to me that you, in your striped shirt, gave me the traditions of the airborne brotherhood, officer honor, and faith in the homeland.

The protection of our homeland, the fulfillment of our duty, the oath, and self-sacrifice for all of this. I want to respond that the Belarusian people and our president have never wanted war with the Ukrainian people. At least the head of state constantly speaks about this. The armed forces are carrying out their tasks to protect sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. They are not currently fighting in Ukraine, but this can be called a red line; it can be called whatever you want, but all of this is done for the sake of peace. For some reason, you do not talk about the United States, which has been pitting Slavs against each other and does everything for that purpose. For some reason, you label all progressive humanity that has risen up now and is providing humanitarian support, sending weapons and ammunition, as military aid. I find it strange that these progressive countries are considered to be on our western border, while what lies to the east of our border is not mentioned.

Progressive countries, not to mention Russia, but also China, Pakistan, India, Vietnam, Mongolia, Tajikistan, and Armenia—I can name many. I don't want to use the phrase you've changed your mind, Valera, but isn't it true that with the years, seasoned pensioners with more experience, and I with less experience, all your nobility and desires were effective for the public back then, so that you could be seen and praised? And now you have simply betrayed all those ideas. I want to hear the answer to the question that I asked you.

Обращение генерал-майора Олега Белоконева

ВоенТВ Беларуси

침묵과 불의에 맞서기: 발레라에게 보내는 감정적 호소

오랜 친구가 다양한 인도주의적, 정치적 이슈에 대한 발레라의 침묵에 혼란과 실망을 표합니다.

이 친구는 과거 경험을 언급하며 두 사람 사이의 유대감과 공유된 가치를 강조합니다.

이 연설은 발레라가 현재 진행 중인 불의와 고통을 인정하고 해결해 달라는 진심 어린 호소입니다.

화자는 수신자의 행동에 배신감을 느끼며 수신자에 대한 과거의 지지에 의문을 제기합니다.

수신자의 행동에 실망감을 느끼고 그들의 우정을 재평가합니다.

화자는 수신자의 선택과 대조적으로 자신의 가치관과 명예 의식을 반성합니다.

우크라이나 분쟁에 대한 벨라루스 대통령의 입장

벨라루스 대통령은 평화에 대한 벨라루스의 열망을 강조하며 우크라이나와의 전쟁을 원하지 않는다고 밝혔습니다.

벨라루스 군대는 주권과 독립을 지키는 데 주력하고 있지만 현재 우크라이나에서 전투에 참여하지 않고 있습니다.

미국의 개입에 대한 강한 비판과 서쪽 국가들의 점진적인 지원에 대한 인식이 있는 반면, 동쪽은 언급되지 않았습니다.

과거 발레라의 고귀하고 효과적인 아이디어는 수년에 걸쳐 배신당한 것처럼 보입니다.

대중을 향한 그의 초기 열망이 진정성이 있었는지에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있습니다.

발레라의 이상에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있으며, 시간이 지남에 따라 변화하는 그의 입장을 반영하고 있습니다.