한국어 현지 고급 시험 2024 리뷰

2024년 현지 고등 한국어 시험은 이전 국가 시험과 비슷한 난이도로 보수적으로 출제되었으며, 관리 가능한 수준으로 출제되었습니다.

### 2024년 지방고시 한국어 시험 복습 및 2025년 준비하기
* 📝 2024년 지방직 9급 공무원 시험은 **전년도 국가직 및 지방직 공무원 시험과 비슷한 난이도**로 예상보다 쉽게 출제된 것으로 평가되었습니다.
* 📚 독해 영역은 **빈칸 채우기 추론 문제 두 개와 주제 문제 두 개**로 구성되었으며, 수사학과 말하기 스타일을 결합하는 데 중점을 둔 문제가 출제되었습니다.
* 📜 문학에서는 **고전 시와 생소한 현대 문학 지문**이 시험에 출제되었으며, **고전과 현대 문학 모두에 대한 이해**가 필요한 문제가 출제되었습니다.
* ✏ 문법과 규정과 관련된 두 개의 오류 찾기 문제가 포함되었으며, **최근 문법 이론이 변경된 것**이 핵심 포인트입니다.
* 📖 어휘와 한자 문제 세 가지가 출제되었으며, **어휘 문제는 문맥적 의미**를 중심으로, **한자 문제는 예시 평가와 유사한 형식**으로 출제되었습니다.
* 🎯 2025년 시험에서는 **염료의 문맥적 의미 문제, 한자어 의미 유형 문제, 실전 쓰기 유형 문제**를 주의 깊게 살펴보는 것이 좋습니다.
* 🧠 7번 문제는 **문법과 언어의 광범위한 측면**을 포함하는 언어학 관련 문제가 출제될 것으로 예상됩니다.
* 🗣 과학 및 기술 용어를 사용하는 비문학 텍스트(예: 법률 텍스트)와 다자간 대화, 토론 및 논쟁과 관련된 텍스트가 **2025년에 더 두드러질 것**으로 보입니다.

Hello, this is Megastudy civil servant Korean teacher, Lee Yoojin. For those who took the local high-level exam in 2024, thank you for your hard work. I will give a brief overall review, and later tonight, I will be live with five teachers to talk about the local high-level exam, so please tune in. First, let me briefly share my thoughts. I wrote a one-liner review saying that this exam was about wrapping up the Korean language content we have studied so far. It was a conservative test with no particular surprises in the questions. Unlike the recent national exam, which had P-type blank deduction questions and future-oriented issues for 2025, this time, they seemed to stick to the traditional format, keeping their promise. They conducted the exam in a very conservative manner. So, this year's local high-level Korean language exam was similar to the previous national exam.

It was easier than expected, and last year's difficulty level was similar to that of national and local civil service exams. Therefore, we can say that the difficulty level of this year's test paper was in line with last year's. So, if you are preparing for next year, it would be good to prepare thoroughly for reading comprehension. When we talk about each section, for reading comprehension, even if you trained well for the existing types, you could score safely. They provided two topic types: fill-in-the-blank inference and overall, it was about reading the entire passage and finding the theme, so two theme questions were given. Next, in terms of development method, combining rhetoric and speaking styles, two questions were set. Additionally, general inferences were relatively straightforward. Although they presented it as a bit difficult, it actually required inference.

The passage was not difficult because it almost directly used sentences from the questions. Then, it showed the introduction, main body, and conclusion, and even aligned the beginning of the options, so it was a type that had already progressed a significant part of the process for you to arrange it like this. Therefore, I think that more time was saved on arranging the questions than usual. Next, in literature, there was a classical poetry section. I suggested looking at classical poetry, so I summarized 100 poems that come out of the textbook, and four came out of the textbook, and in the case of modern literature, although unfamiliar passages appeared, it was a format issue, and since the concept words of the options were commonly used, I think you could easily find them. Then, there was a question that required understanding the content of both classical and modern literature. One was about the theme, and the other was about the protagonist's emotions.

Two questions came out in the find the error section, one regarding grammar and the other regarding regulations. It's been a long time since there was a change in the theory of grammar. So, many people these days say that there won't be any changes in the theory. I think you need to know how to calculate changes. So, a change in punctuation came out. Next, a mix of Korean spelling and standardization regulations came out. Some of you may find terms like 옥죄다 unfamiliar, but terms like 쇠다 and 짜깁기 and distinguishing between 들려 and 들러 were common, so even if one of the choices seems unfamiliar, I expect you to easily overcome it. Next, vocabulary and Chinese character problems. Nowadays, there are more vocabulary and Chinese character problems than grammar regulations. This time, there were three vocabulary and Chinese character problems. However, now vocabulary focuses on contextual meaning issues.

The question that appeared in the example also appeared, and then there was a problem with the meaning of Chinese characters, so how do you solve and write this? This type, which was also in the example evaluation, appeared the same way, and there was one notation that you all were afraid of, but it was a basic notation that could be found in the textbook, so this time, even the Chinese characters were easy. Therefore, it can be said that there were no difficult questions even in the memorization part. So, in 2025, I will tell you the issues that you should pay attention to. For those of you who will take the exam next year. So, in terms of types, the contextual meaning question of the dye that came out as a set type in the example evaluation of number 2, and the Chinese meaning type question that came out as a set type in the example evaluation of number 6. But now, I'm giving you everything, so there were no Chinese notation issues in the example questions. Next, the practical writing type question that was asked in the practical writing evaluation of number 11. These three questions are now types for 2020.

It can be considered to be related to 15 years, and the rest is about finding topics, general inference, content matching, and arrangement. Originally, all of these are just the basics that are normally brought as they are. So, in 2025, in the next passage, what should be paid attention to in the text is number 7, linguistics. I probably used the expression linguistics as I drew all the deductions into the reading algorithm, unlike other teachers who might have used the name grammar as it is or maybe used the term Korean linguistics. However, due to these kinds of issues, I used the expression linguistics. Therefore, now, as grammar and also these relations between language and thinking come into non-literary texts, that's why, when I brought up grammar in the context of non-literary texts, it became linguistics. Because it involved comparative linguistics and it was a bit different from just Korean grammar, so it needs to be viewed more broadly.

If you have it, yes, that's why I used the term linguistics. Number 7 is that kind of question. Next, number 14, non-literary texts using scientific and technological terminology will be more activated in the future. This time, even though copyright issues didn't come out in a legal style, legal texts can also be considered non-literary texts. Next, number 20, understanding the issues and positions of multi-party dialogues, debates, and toys, these are the types of texts that you should pay attention to in 2025. When you read, who is it? It's me. So, now, you should quickly forget about today's test. Those who are reading the summary are interested in preparing for next year's test, and they are thinking about looking at the summary now. Therefore, on Monday, I will have this test paper, and you all will.

I have created a separate diagnostic evaluation, but if I look at myself through this test paper in 2020, what about 2025? Am I in line with the 2025 style, or am I more disadvantaged? I will provide sharp answers to such issues on Monday. I diagnose you through a local language test paper called the Korean MRI, and provide explanations and lessons tailored to the 2025 style. However, instead of just explaining local problems from question 1 to 20, I can also provide explanations. I think about people who show such characteristics in this test paper, even if they answered correctly or incorrectly, in terms of handling passages in this pattern. You should make corrections like this, and if you plan to do it in 2025, you can reduce the amount of learning in Korean, or you should prepare more for this case, or solutions like this.

I will give you some precise information, so please do not throw away the Korean MRI test paper that will be conducted on Monday morning, keep it and make sure to listen to it. Today, take a rest and tomorrow, on Saturday and Sunday, relax a bit. So, I also posted on Instagram that on rainy days, isn't it perfect to have makgeolli and green onion pancakes? That has nothing to do with the test or its results. You all have the qualification to enjoy makgeolli and green onion pancakes today. Moreover, the fact that you are listening to the overall assessment at this moment means that you can continue to challenge yourself and achieve good results. Whether it is this test or not, until the day you achieve your goal, I will be with you.

2024년 지방직 9급 국어 이유진 선생님 총평

🥇메가스터디교육이 만든 공무원 전문 브랜드
📌공무원 합격의 새로운 기준, 메가공무원
▶채널 관련 문의: megacstkeeper@gmail.com


메가공무원

2024년 지방고등고시 한국어 시험 후기

시험은 이전 국가고시와 비슷하게 보수적이고 전통적인 형식에 따라 출제되어 예상보다 쉬웠습니다.

독해 영역은 빈칸 채우기 추론과 주제 찾기에 중점을 두었으며, 비교적 간단한 일반 추론 문제가 출제되었습니다.

전개 방식은 수사학과 말하기 스타일을 결합하는 문제가 포함되었습니다.

문학의 트렌드 변화가 미치는 영향

이 지문은 고전 및 현대 문학 문제에 대한 체계적인 개요를 제공했습니다.

옵션에서 자주 사용되는 개념어를 강조하여 탐색하기 쉽게 만들었습니다.

주제, 주인공의 감정, 문법, 어법, 문장 부호, 한글 맞춤법, 표준어, 어휘, 한자 등을 다루며 문맥적 의미 문제에 중점을 두었습니다.

죄송하지만 오해가 있는 것 같습니다.

제공하신 텍스트는 주어진 입력 내용을 요약하는 작업과 관련이 없는 것 같습니다.

요약하고 싶은 특정 텍스트가 있다면 그 텍스트를 제공해 주시면 기꺼이 요약 작업을 도와드리겠습니다.

2025년 언어 텍스트의 미래 초점

2025년의 언어 지문은 과학 및 기술 용어가 포함된 비문학 지문을 우선시하게 될 것입니다.

다자간 대화, 토론, 다양한 관점도 언어 자료에서 중요하게 다뤄질 것입니다.

진화하는 언어 환경과 2025년의 언어 사용 방식에 대비하는 것은 다가오는 시험과 평가에 필수적인 요소가 될 것입니다.

월요일 MRI 검사를 앞두고 오늘은 푹 쉬고 주말 동안 휴식을 취하세요.

막걸리와 파전을 즐기며 여러분은 휴식을 취할 자격이 있다는 것을 기억하세요.

여러분의 노력과 결단이 이번 시험이든 다른 어떤 도전이든 여러분의 목표에 도달할 수 있을 것입니다.