Just to stick with the France thing. Mark, it does seem Phil was saying it does seem as if markets are giving the president time to find another option. You have to wonder how long that patience lasts as year-end looms.

Yeah, I think that will be the case at the moment. In terms of that, I think people have realised, maybe belatedly after the initial tension, that spending may not be too bad while they still struggle to get a government under some of the emergency measures.

So I think the front story stays long-term negative, but I'm not sure you play the bearish scenario in any short-term basis, and I think that's the kind of story for next year, which makes it very hard.

I am someone who thinks that the euro will be the outlet for negative pressure in Europe next year, and I think it'll be around the fiscal concerns, around the debt concerns, not just around France, but across the whole region. But it will be very, very hard to plan

the short term because the ECB has many backstop measures now. And the fact is that while all these negative headlines are in the politics and the government, they are not the core concern of excess spending. Ultimately, emergency measures can curtail that.

Well, it's not giving the Chinese government much latitude, though. Why not? Well, the talk is good. We keep getting disappointed, though. Do we need to see action in order for the market to actually respond positively next time?

Look, we've been having this debate today. Chinese stocks are up 25% over the last three months. Hong Kong stocks are up 15% over the last three months. It's a pretty wonderful return in any world.

And that's since, I mean, it was about three months ago that they suddenly said, 'Hey, we're going to try fixing the market's problems.' I think what people are mistaking is they want a 2009-type rally.

They want the stock market to double in a year. We're not going to get that. This is going to be a stock market that continues to be higher. Both Hong Kong stocks and Chinese stocks are higher than they were a year ago.

Now, obviously, they did badly for most of the year until three months ago. The corner has been turned. It is not going to be a crazy rally, though. It's going to be just a more positive story than the bleak, gloomy story of the last few years.

I think the Chinese government is winning, and I think they're actually doing it right by not encouraging crazy animal spirits, but getting something more sustainable. They have committed to policies that will bring about more consumer spending, haven't they?

From a market's perspective, what are the types of policies that we're watching for on that front that would really make a difference? I think people want to see more of the consumer getting better, as you mentioned. And to go with that point, it is true that this market is not running away with itself.

They keep on being superficially disappointed. But the fact is the government has said they do care about the market, and that has been seen, even though much of the world has been disappointed by the extent of the measures. And it wasn't the big bazooka they

wanted.
The stock market continues to do absolutely fine overall, and I think that shows that this is a government that is focused on the market; they're going to try to stabilize the property market, not start a new bull market in property.

And they're going to try to support the consumer on the other side, which means that they want more sustainable growth. That's going to be okay and better insulate against potential trade measures next year. So the China story is good, not brilliant.

Markets in 3 Minutes

Welcome to the Bloomberg Technology YouTube channel. Subscribe for original series and mini-docs on game-changing technologies, profiles on innovators, live conversations with experts, and breaking technology news & analysis from Bloomberg TV.