Understanding Polling Accuracy in the 2024 Election

Polls indicate a tight race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, but their accuracy is limited by sampling methods.

### Understanding Polls: The Complexity Behind Election Predictions
* 📊 Recent polls indicate a tight race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, with figures showing Harris at **48%** and Trump at **48%** according to the Times Siena poll on October 25th.
* 📉 However, these numbers stem from a sample survey, not the entire population, and response rates can be as low as **1 to 2%**, requiring pollsters to contact **up to 100,000 individuals** to gather a typical sample size of **1,000**.
* 🔍 It's important to note that polling numbers come with a **margin of error**, typically around **3%**, which means the actual support could be **higher or lower than reported**.
* 📈 Pollsters use a method called **weighting** to adjust samples to better reflect the general population, ensuring that demographics like **age, race, and education** are accurately represented.
* ⚖ Weighting is particularly critical because past elections showed that certain groups, like **non-college-educated Trump supporters**, were often **underrepresented in polls**.
* 🗳 Despite these adjustments, predicting actual voter turnout remains challenging, as **only about two-thirds of voting-age Americans typically cast their ballots**.
* 🔮 Ultimately, while polls can provide insights into public opinion and highlight closely contested states, they primarily indicate that the race is **tight**, and the true outcome will only be known **once the votes are counted**.
* 💬 To support accurate journalism on this topic, consider joining Vox's membership program for access to **in-depth articles and expert analyses**.

What polls can actually tell us

Vox helps you understand our world.

Vox video is Bridgett Henwood, Cath Spangler, Adam Freelander, Joey Sendaydiego, Coleman Lowndes, Christophe Haubursin, Kim Mas, Laura Bult, Ed Vega, Rajaa Elidrissi, and with research support from Melissa Hirsch. 

Become a member today: https://www.vox.com/support-now

Check out our FAQ on permissions and licensing of our videos: https://www.voxmedia.com/pages/licensing

✉️ Write us: voxvideo@vox.com


New polls show Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in a tight race, but these numbers can be misleading.

Pollsters rely on a small sample size, often with a low response rate, to gauge public opinion.

Despite the small sample, these polls can still provide an accurate measure of a population's opinion if interpreted with caution.

Polling numbers have a margin of error, with a 3% difference in either direction still being potentially accurate for a sample size of 1,000.

Increasing the sample size beyond 2,000 interviews has diminishing returns on accuracy.

The margin of error does not account for other polling process errors, making it a low estimate, and pollsters use weighting to ensure the sample size represents the entire population.

Pollsters often struggle to reach a representative sample, leading to overrepresentation of certain groups.

Weighting is used to adjust the values of individuals in a poll, giving higher values to underrepresented groups and lower values to overrepresented ones.

Recently, pollsters have started weighting for education, past voting behavior, and party affiliation to better represent the larger population and avoid underestimating support for candidates.

The Challenges of Predicting Election Outcomes with Polls

Pollsters struggle to accurately predict election outcomes due to the unknown population of future voters.

While they make educated guesses based on factors like likelihood to vote and past voting behavior, only two-thirds of eligible Americans typically turn out to vote.

Polls are useful for capturing public opinion and identifying decisive states, but when voting choices are close, they mainly indicate a tight race, with the true outcome only revealed after the votes are counted.