### Ukraine's Long-Range Missile Strikes: Implications for War

Ukraine's use of long-range missiles marks a significant escalation in the conflict with Russia.

### Ukraine's Long-Range Missile Strikes: A New Phase in the Conflict
* 🚀 Ukraine has launched long-range missiles, provided by the US, targeting an **ammunition storage facility** in Karachev, Russia, marking a **significant escalation in the conflict**.
* 📍 This attack, occurring **75 miles from the Ukrainian border**, represents the **first use of NATO-made arms** against Russian territory, which the Kremlin has warned could **escalate tensions further**.
* 🛡 President Biden's decision to allow Ukraine to use these **long-range weapons** follows months of requests from Kyiv and comes after **North Korean troops joined Russian forces** on the battlefield.
* 💣 The ATACMS missile system, capable of **striking up to 190 miles away**, alongside other potential weapons like British/French Storm Shadows, could **significantly enhance Ukraine's offensive capabilities**.
* 📉 The ongoing war has severely impacted Ukraine's economy and population, especially as winter approaches and Russia has **degraded Ukraine's heating capabilities**.
* 📊 Data from the Institute for the Study of War indicates that **hundreds of Russian military assets** are now within Ukraine's striking range, **increasing the pressure on Russia**.
* ⚔ Analysts suggest that targeting Russian positions, especially in areas like Kursk where **over 50,000 troops are stationed**, could be part of Ukraine's strategy to **push for peace negotiations**.
* ⚠ Putin has warned that Ukraine's use of long-range weapons crosses a "**red line**," leaving uncertainty about the Kremlin's potential response to this new phase of the conflict.

- [Narrator] Ukraine fired long-range missiles provided by the US into Russia, hitting an ammunition storage facility near the Russian city of Karachev. The attack, 75 miles from the border with Ukraine, is the first such assault to use long-range NATO-made arms.

It's a move that the Kremlin previously warned it would consider a major escalation. (Putin speaking Russian) The ammunition storage facility is one of hundreds of known Russian military assets that have just become targets for Kyiv. (missiles humming)

Here's what the use of Western arms on Russian territory means for the war and what could come next. (missiles humming) Kyiv had been pleading for months for its allies to remove restrictions on using Western-made long-range weapons to strike inside Russia.

In November, President Biden finally gave Ukraine the green light. In addition to ATACMS, Biden's move could open the door for other weapons like British/French cruise missiles, Storm Shadows or SCALP to be used.

ATACMS are a surface-to-surface missile system fired from a mobile launcher vehicle. They can strike up to 190 miles away, well behind Russian lines. By comparison, Storm Shadows have a maximum range of around 155 miles,

meaning they can also hit deep into Russian territory. - Storm Shadow has been used for quite some time now. They've been used to hit Russian command bunkers, they've been used to hit Russian naval headquarters in Crimea, they've been used quite frequently to hit ammunition dumps

and they've also toppled several bridges. (soldier shouting) (explosion banging) - [Narrator] Previously,
Western allies didn't allow Kyiv to strike deeper into Russia, fearing an escalation of the war, but Biden changed his mind

after thousands of North Korean troops joined Russia's army on the battlefield, according to US officials. (weapons banging) - We're now heading into three
years in terms of this war and Russia continues to
sort of pressure Ukraine and take territory, albeit incrementally,

but still take territory and
it's having a terrible effect on the Ukrainian economy,
Ukrainian population and as we're heading into the winter, you've got the added effects of Russia having degraded Ukraine's
ability to heat itself, which is also problematic
for the Ukrainians.

- [Narrator] Now, hundreds
of Russian military objects are within Kyiv's range according to data compiled by the Institute for the Study of War. - Russia's Air Force has
been deadly in the fight in the sense of they've been launching

all these glide bombs and that's been pivotal
in places like Avdiivka. So, you know, the further
Ukraine can push back the Russian Air Force, the safer it is for Ukrainian troops. - [Narrator] Kyiv has already targeted

many Russian military assets with its long-range drone program. This includes an attack in September at a major arsenal nearly 300 miles away from the Ukraine border. - The Ukrainians have gradually been able to extend their range in terms
of how they can hit Russia

and so, Russia has had to gradually move its ammunition dumps,
its command centers, its very valuable assets,
its planes, its navy, effectively, from the
range of various weapons. - [Narrator] But Ukraine
says being able to strike

deep into Russia with
more powerful weapons could form part of a strategy
to force Moscow to seek peace. Analysts say that Ukraine
could also target positions in the Kursk region
where Russia has amassed more than 50,000 troops,

including some 10,000 from North Korea in an effort to recapture the territory that Ukraine's forces
recaptured earlier this year. The policy shift appears to be part of the Biden administration's push to give what it can to Ukraine before Donald Trump returns
to the White House in January.

Trump, and his Vice
President-elect JD Vance, are expected to press for negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine. - You never have one
weapon that wins a war. We can talk about giving Ukraine an edge and being able to hit deep
into Russian territory,

but the Ukrainians have been
hitting very far into Russia for quite some time now
and it has not won the war. The Russians are still pressuring Ukraine, still taking territory,
albeit incrementally. - [Narrator] President
Vladimir Putin has warned

that allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with these long range
weapons crosses a red line. - It's very difficult to
predict what they'll do, but, however, the Kremlin
has talked before of the West crossing red lines and not reacted when those
red lines have been crossed

and there's been frequent red lines that have been crossed. (missile banging)

Ukraine’s First-Ever ATACMS Strike in Russia, Explained | WSJ

The Wall Street Journal takes you inside carefully selected stories and events in a visually captivating way so you can dig deeper into the news and insights that matter to you. 

The Wall Street Journal

Ukraine's Long-Range Missile Strike on Russia

Ukraine used US-provided long-range missiles to strike a Russian ammunition facility near Karachev.

The Kremlin considers this a major escalation.

Kyiv had requested permission to use Western long-range weapons for months.

President Biden authorized the use of ATACMS and potentially other long-range weapons.

Storm Shadows have a range of around 155 miles and have been used to strike various Russian targets.

Western allies previously restricted strikes deep into Russia due to escalation fears.

The war has negatively impacted the Ukrainian economy and population.

Russia's actions have severely affected Ukraine's ability to heat homes during winter.

Hundreds of Russian military assets are within Kyiv's range.

Russia's Air Force has been effective in using glide bombs.

Ukraine's Expanding Strike Capabilities and Strategy

Ukraine has gradually extended its strike range, forcing Russia to relocate assets.

Ukraine aims to use deeper strikes to pressure Moscow into peace negotiations.

Potential targets include positions in the Kursk region with over 50,000 troops, including North Korean soldiers.

Political Implications and Future Outlook

The policy shift may be linked to the Biden administration's efforts before a potential Trump presidency.

Experts note that no single weapon can win a war, and the long-range strikes haven't ended the conflict.

Putin warned that allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range weapons crosses a red line.

The Kremlin's past reactions to red line crossings are inconsistent, making future actions unpredictable.