Faith, Signs, and Perceptions of Reality

Jeanne believes her visions are divine signs, but others question her interpretations and insist on skepticism.

### The Struggle Between Faith and Doubt: A Dialogue on Visions and Signs
* 🤔 The conversation begins with one character questioning another's **intense emotions and presence**, suggesting a **sense of urgency and concern**.
* 🙅 The second character insists on solitude, claiming that their visions require them to be alone, highlighting the **importance of personal faith and connection**.
* 👁 When asked about these visions, the character reveals their belief that they are **waiting for divine signs**, indicating a **deep spiritual commitment**.
* ✝ The dialogue shifts to a discussion of faithfulness to God, with the character asserting that they have **followed divine instructions** through signs like the **wind and clouds**.
* ⚔ The mention of a sword in a field becomes a point of contention, with one character dismissing it as **mere coincidence**, while the other views it as a **significant sign**.
* 🔍 This disagreement underscores a broader theme of perception, suggesting that what one sees may be influenced by **personal beliefs and desires**.
* 💭 Ultimately, the conversation reflects the **tension between faith and skepticism**, as one character challenges the **validity of the other's experiences and interpretations of divine signs**.

- Why were you shouting like that? - What are you doing here? You can't be here. Go away! - Why? Are you waiting for someone else? - Yes. - Who? - My visions. - Your visions? Are they going to visit you in here? - Yes. That's why I pray. - I would like to see them. Do you mind if I stay on this side? I won't bother you. - No! You can't. You can't stay, or they won't come. - Why not? - Because I must be alone. - Oh... They still might not come. - What do you mean they won't come? - Why would they come? - Because I have always been faithful to God, and I have always followed everything He has said and done everything He has asked me to do. - Did God ask you to do something? - Yes. Yes, many things. - So, God said, Jeanne, I need you? - No... but... He sent me signs. - Signs? What signs? - The wind... - Wind. - The clouds, resonating... - Resonating clouds. - The dance... The dance... - Dance. - The sword... The sword that lay in the field. That was a sign. - No, that was just a sword in the field. - No, that was a sign... - No, that was just a sword in the field. - It couldn't have gotten there by itself.

Why choose one? There are many ways in which a sword could have ended up on a battlefield. It seems like a very valid explanation. But what about this? There are still other possibilities. Or something quicker. And all of that without counting the inexplicable. But out of an infinite number of possibilities, you had to choose this one: You didn't see what it was, Jeanne. You only saw what you wanted to see.

It was a sword in a field.

Valath Roshgrade

The dialogue revolves around one person waiting for their visions and praying for their arrival.

They believe that being alone is essential for the visions to come.

The other person questions the significance of the signs, such as the wind, clouds, and a sword in the field, but the first person insists they are meaningful.

The presence of a sword on a battlefield can be explained in many ways, highlighting the multitude of possibilities.

The narrator suggests that the choice of explanation is driven by personal perception and desire.

Ultimately, the passage emphasizes the difficulty of making definitive choices in the face of infinite possibilities.