I'll quickly look into it because today is busy. Yesterday, there was an incident where a 22-year-old man in an apartment gym in Hwaseong, Gyeonggi-do, was falsely accused as a sexual offender in the entertainment industry. You can find detailed information in the previous video. Anyway, while the incident was spreading everywhere and causing a commotion, Nam-gu, who appealed his innocence, was up all night, unable to sleep for over an hour, posting an image of Pepe crying. When I think about it, it seems really pitiful. He was just someone who went to the gym to work out after dinner, but he ended up being labeled as a sexual offender overnight just because he went to the bathroom to urinate and came out. Not only that, the police came out, so on the community board of the Dongtan Police Station, posts criticizing the police's careless attitude poured in like crazy, and even a national petition was filed. That gathered 100 signatures in just a day.

It is fortunate that it has become a topic of public discussion thanks to the interest of many people, and it even made it to the news. Reportedly, the incident involving the Taegi Tezi case, a member of the National Assembly in Dongtan, Lee Jun-seok, was mentioned. Subsequently, on the Hwaseong Dongtan Police Station's website, a female youth manager posted a statement. However, it is nothing but a content with no substance. The police met with the reporter and the reported person according to the reporting process and took their statements. They are currently securing CCTV footage around the scene of the incident for investigation. The police stated that they will thoroughly investigate the case based on objective evidence to ensure that no one is unfairly treated. Additionally, they will verify the facts regarding any inappropriate behavior by the police officers during the reporting process. It's ridiculous to say that they need to verify the facts again. The audio recordings are already available. What's the point of verifying the facts again?

Hey, how old are you now? I'm 2 years old. I'm a college student majoring in math. I just came to college, and I failed. I just did it. I have to tell you what I thought in a situation. I did it in a different place. I'll take a picture for you. If you're curious about our contact, contact me. I'll give you a separate contact for the schedule. We'll contact you again. We'll get the investigation again. We'll contact you, so just match the time. While using the South Korean Medical Center, they openly stamped me as a criminal and presumed me guilty. If you have anything, please let me know. I didn't do anything wrong. When we met earlier, you asked me. You asked me now. What did you come for then? I think I would have said something like that. Oh, where did you go? Just ask me. I'm waiting. I'm waiting for you. I am waiting for a proper explanation from the police.

They don't help, don't even answer the phone, so because it's unfair, I went to the police station myself to ask, and they treated me as if it were a hassle, telling me not to do anything and just stay quiet. They even asked if they would take responsibility if things went wrong. From the initial stage of the police meeting the complainant to later when the complainant visits the police station to ask about the progress of the case, everything is recorded. What else do they need to confirm? Are they going to fight with the recording now? At this point, it's almost like they've declared war on the entire nation, isn't it? Moreover, saying that they did everything by the book, is that their procedure? Saying they will ensure no one feels unjust, but already, even from their YouTube ID, the sense of injustice remains.

Even from this perspective in the opening statement, the brazenness is strongly felt, and if it hadn't melted away, my life almost turned upside down. Anyway, by showing the insane behavior of Dongtan Police Station, eventually, even Bill Gates is being investigated about his past. Among them, one thing is that in the past, a local Dongtan Police Station executive had a history of running an original prostitution establishment. It is said that the establishment was operated under someone else's name, but amusingly, that police officer had also brought down a building involved in prostitution in the past. So, the culprit was a culprit and at the same time, playing as a police officer. Anyway, looking at this kind of past history, I somehow understand these attitudes of investigating and issuing statements in that manner. And in the meantime, there is another ridiculous post that has come up on the bulletin board.

First of all, my profession is a police officer. Let's put aside informal language and admit mistakes without argument. Honestly, let's set aside our anger and think. Is it more likely that a woman with no motive would suddenly falsely accuse someone she just met, or is it more likely that the man is lying? What nonsense is this again? How high is the probability of that happening? And since when do the police use probability to identify criminals? Of course, they can suspect someone who looks suspicious, but isn't it more appropriate to first secure evidence through an investigation and then find the real criminal among the suspects? Just because a woman reports something, should we treat the accused as guilty without even finding evidence? Is this the right approach? Moreover, surprisingly, cases where women with no motive act like that are more common than you think. There are even memorable incidents like a man playing games on the subway and sweating nervously.

After wiping, if a woman who was sitting in front of him suddenly accused a man of touching a specific part in front of her, secretly recording a video, and even filing a lawsuit, the man said he never touched her like that, just wiped off sweat. However, when they checked the video that was actually taken, there was no lewd behavior, only playing games. So now, as the man is taking legal action, the excuse later was that someone simply wanted to sue for no reason. They even educate on how to establish the innocence of sexual crimes in women's communities. They say it was too difficult to set up a consistent statement for guilt, so they advise leaving counseling calls and medical records, demanding female investigators. It's really confusing, and later on, the man.

Even if someone is acquitted or not charged, those who have that kind of mindset often feel emotionally harmed, so they go as far as suing anyone for emotional distress. Just by roughly looking into it, there are numerous related cases overflowing. What kind of probability are they calculating and sitting there? If you are a police officer, you should conduct a proper investigation and talk with evidence. Who said that? This is a very famous statement. When an investigation related to a sexual crime begins, you should immediately inform your workplace. It's not even confirmed as the perpetrator yet, just at the stage of investigation, you should inform your workplace. Isn't that really losing your mind? Once the perpetrator is confirmed, who would stop reporting it? If someone did that and later it turns out they were innocent, who will take responsibility? This statement was made in 2018, and after that, the non-punishable crime related to sexual offenses was also raised. So, like this.

The selfish mindset of the male-dominated society is ruining the country, and due to the influence that started there, now the same victims are being created. Anyway, today, after a violent incident at the Mars gym with no sense of guilt, various incidents have unfolded. So, I have summarized the additional developments that have occurred. Therefore, today's takeaway is that Korean men are still being victimized just for being men.

이정도면 경찰도 공범

📌 최근 이슈들에 대한 나의 생각 💬 