Overpopulation: Misconceptions and Realities

Global population growth has slowed, and technological advancements in agriculture have increased food production per person.

### Overpopulation Myths and Realities: A Closer Look at Global Demographics
* 🌍  The 1960s and 1970s saw a surge in concerns over overpopulation, with solutions like **adding sterilants to the water supply** or **withdrawing food aid for certain countries** being proposed.
* 📉  Proponents of the "population bomb" theory underestimated the impact of the demographic transition, with global fertility rates dropping significantly from **5 children per woman in 1950** to **2.3 today**.
* 🌾  Technological advancements in agriculture have outpaced population growth, with crop yields **doubling, tripling, or quadrupling** over the last 50 years.
* 🌡️  Contrary to popular belief, high-fertility countries often have **low per capita CO2 emissions**, meaning that adding billions of people in these regions would have **minimal impact on global emissions**.
* 👴  Some countries are now facing the opposite problem of underpopulation, with **aging populations and shrinking workforces** posing economic challenges.
* 🦠  The comparison of humans to cancer in environmental discussions is criticized as damaging and unproductive, as it implies that **some people should not exist**.
* 💼  The video is sponsored by Odoo, an open source business management software that integrates various business functions into one platform, offering a **free 14-day trial** for interested businesses.

- This Big Think video is sponsored by Odoo. - If you go back in human history, I'm sure the 'silver bullet'
of many environmental problems was just, There's just too many people. If we had less people, this
problem would be solved. This particular overpopulation concern became really prominent in
the 1960s and the 1970s. At the time, the big concern of the day was how we could produce enough food for a rapidly growing global population. This is really brought to the fore with the publication of the book, The Population Bomb, by
Paul R. Ehrlich in 1968. I think there are many people
of this same opinion today who still really strongly argue that the root of our
environmental problems is that there are just
too many people on Earth. So some of the really alarming proposals on how to tackle overpopulation
are, for example, adding sterilants to the
water or food supply.

offering responsibility prizes for families that chose
not to have children, offering lotteries where you
only get into the lottery if you are a couple that
hasn't had children, removing financial support
for families of a given size, or some of the most morbid, which is that, and especially for lower income countries, not just this notion of forced
or encouraged sterilization, but also the withdrawal
of food aid packages. There's often this framing
of a triage system, where some countries in the
world might be redeemable, and maybe we should help those
countries to feed themselves, but some countries are past this point- they could never be
able to feed themselves, and therefore, we should
withdraw any food aid. I think there was two key things the proponents of the population bomb or this overpopulation argument got wrong: I think the first one is
that they underestimated the impact of the demographic transition. I think they assumed
that the world population

would continue to grow
exponentially, and it hasn't. While the global population
is still growing, in fact, it's growing at a much slower rate. Global population growth
rates peaked decades ago and have halved since then. If we look at projections
into the future, the UN, for example, expects that
global population will peak well before the end of the
century and start to decline. The key thing that they
underestimated here was the fall in global fertility rates. Now, this is the kind of
average number of children that an average woman would have. Now globally in 1950,
that was around five, so every woman would have,
on average, five children. That has since fallen to
2.3 children per woman, and this is true across
most countries in the world. I think the other key thing the proponents of this underestimated was the massive technological advancements we've seen in agriculture. The issue at the time is that we wondered

how we would produce enough food for a growing population. But not only has global population growth slowed, we've also massively increased the amount of food we can produce. Crop yields across the world have doubled, tripled, or quadrupled over the last 50 years, which means that the amount of food we produce per person has actually gone up, not down, despite the fact that we have billions of more people on Earth. I think a key argument that people often say in terms of climate change is that there's just far too many people. And they'll often point to particular countries where fertility rates are still very high. There are some countries, for example, across Africa, where the average number of children per woman is four or five. I think what's really key to highlight here is that in these countries where fertility rates are very high, the incomes are low, and per capita CO2 emissions are also very, very low, extremely low.

That means that when you
do the maths on this, you could actually add billions of people at those very low incomes. It would have almost no impact
on global CO2 emissions. I think the other issue that some people are now highlighting is the
notion of underpopulation. Actually, population
growth slows down too much, and it creates particular problems. I think this won't be a problem for many countries in the
world, but I think for some, especially richer countries
with aging populations, you will start to see problems
with particular demographics and particular balances
of different demographics. The key problem with aging populations is that within a country, you
want a large number of people in the kind of working age bracket. Those are the people that
are propping up the economy and driving the economy forward. I think the problem that
some countries will have with large aging populations is that they won't have a
large enough group of people in the working age category.

I think there is this comparison that's often made by people that say that the problem is overpopulation. Is that humans are often compared to a cancer. Well, it's true that we do have environmental impacts, and we do have large problems to solve. I think it's a very dire prediction that we don't contribute anything to the world. If your messaging is that the human in front of you is a cancer, what you're saying is that you don't want them to be there, and you think that they should be removed. If this is gonna be the comparison we make on how to tackle environmental problems, it's a really damaging messaging, and just one that won't get us there. Hey Big Thinkers, thanks for watching this video. But before we go, we'd like to take a moment to thank the sponsor of this video, Odoo. Odoo is an open source business management software that acts as your company's operating system.

It's intuitive and user-friendly, and can be customized to meet your business's unique needs. Many companies find themselves juggling a patchwork of different applications - one for inventory, another for accounting, one for project management, and yet another for the website. This fragmented approach can be chaotic and inefficient. Odoo simplifies everything by offering a full suite of integrated apps that handle everything from bookkeeping to building an e-commerce website, all in one place. It's relief from the chaos. Odoo is particularly great for smaller businesses looking to scale. You can install only the features you need, as Odoo charges per user, not per app. This flexibility means you can easily add more features as your business grows. It's a hopeful solution for your future growth. Plus, if you're just using one app, it's free. Picture running a growing business with all your tools in one place. The technology may sound like a fantasy, but Odoo is very real.

If you're ready to transform your business
operations, visit odoo.com/bigthink to start a free 14-day trial. No credit card required. Or request a demo. Want to dive deeper? Become a Big Think member and join our members-only community, watch videos early, and
unlock full interviews.

The overpopulation myth, debunked by a data scientist | Hannah Ritchie

Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content -- with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields. We aim to help you explore the big ideas and core skills that define knowledge in the 21st century, so you can apply them to the questions and challenges in your own life. Other Frequent contributors include Michio Kaku & Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

Head to bigthink.com for a multitude of articles just as informative and satisfying as our videos. New articles posted daily on a range of intellectual topics. ​Join Big Think+ to gain access to an immense library of content. It features insight from many of the most celebrated and intelligent individuals in the world today.

   - Subscribe for daily videos.
   - Business inquiries and fan suggestions welcome.

Big Think

The Overpopulation Concern and Its Alarming Proposals

The 1960s and 1970s saw a prominent concern about overpopulation and food production for the growing global population.

Alarming proposals to tackle overpopulation included adding sterilants to the water or food supply, offering incentives for not having children, and even withdrawing food aid from lower-income countries.

The proponents of the population bomb underestimated the impact of the demographic transition and the potential for technological and social advancements to address environmental challenges.

The global population growth rate has halved since its peak, and it is projected to peak and decline before the end of the century.

This decline is mainly due to a significant fall in global fertility rates and massive technological advancements in agriculture.

Countries with high fertility rates also have low incomes and very low per capita CO2 emissions.

The Impact of Population Growth on CO2 Emissions and Demographics

Adding billions of people at low incomes would have minimal impact on global CO2 emissions.

Aging populations in some richer countries are creating imbalances in demographics and posing economic challenges.

The comparison of humans to a cancer in relation to overpopulation is seen as a damaging and ineffective way to tackle environmental problems.

Streamline Your Business with Odoo's Integrated Apps

Odoo offers a full suite of integrated apps for all your business needs, from bookkeeping to e-commerce, providing a seamless and efficient solution.

The system is ideal for small businesses, allowing for customization and scalability based on the user's needs, all while offering a free option for single-app use.

With Odoo, you can streamline your tools and operations, all in one place.