AI Chatbot Comparison: OpenAI Chat GPT vs Google Gemini

ChatGPT consistently delivers smarter and more detailed responses than Google's Gemini Advanced.

### AI Chatbot Showdown: OpenAI Chat GPT Plus vs. Google's Gemini Advanced
* 🤖 Today, we put OpenAI's **Chat GPT Plus** and Google's **Gemini Advanced AI** to the test by prompting them with real-world scenarios such as **recipe creation**, **travel itineraries**, and **email drafting**.
* 🍽 In a recipe challenge, Chat GPT suggested a churro with a **Thai coconut dipping sauce**, while Gemini proposed a churro with a **Thai-inspired coating**, showcasing their different approaches to **flavor integration**.
* 🔊 When searching for a red mid-range turntable, Chat GPT provided more options but included one that **didn't meet the color requirement**, whereas Gemini correctly identified which models were **available in red**.
* ✈ For travel recommendations, Chat GPT offered a **reasonable itinerary** for the small town of Festus, Missouri, while Gemini suggested attractions in nearby St. Louis, indicating a **broader scope** in its recommendations.
* ✉ Both chatbots performed well in drafting an email request for a day off, with Chat GPT adopting a **casual tone with emojis**, while Gemini took a more **formal approach with cultural references**.
* 📄 When summarizing a lengthy video game review, both chatbots provided accurate summaries, although Chat GPT's version **borrowed more language from the original text**.
* 🔍 Overall, the testing revealed that while both AIs have strengths and weaknesses, **Chat GPT tends to offer more detailed responses**, making it the preferred choice in this comparison.

[Music] It's the AI chatbot battle. Today, we're testing OpenAI Chat GPT Plus against Google's Gemini Advanced AI. Chatbots are mind-blowing but not without faults, so let's see what each offers and which one gives the best results. To compare the chatbots, I'll prompt them with real-world scenarios like finding and modifying recipes, researching travel, and writing emails. The goal isn't to break the AIs with bizarre riddles or logic problems; I'm looking to see if real questions prompt useful and accurate answers. So, let's dive in. OpenAI Chat GPT Plus subscription costs $20 a month and allows for access to Chat GPT 4, 40 do for regenerative AI images, higher usage limits, and early access to new features. Google's Gemini Advance subscription is also $20 a month and allows access to its 1.5 Pro chatbot, image FX, documented image upload for analysis, code editing, and 2 terab of Google One storage. The context window between the two differs.

greatly. However, Chach BT 40's contacts window is 8,192 tokens, whereas Geminis can handle 1 million. First, we'll use the chatbots to find recipes, shopping, and travel suggestions. So, one way I like to test AI chatbots is by throwing fusion recipes at them. It's pretty easy to make a turkey sandwich, but if you start mixing in different flavors and combinations, it forces the chatbots to pull in different data sets and try to combine them. Let's ask it to create a churro recipe with a Thai twist and with some pumpkin spice as well. And of course, it's going to have like the flat flour and the water and salt and butter and all that stuff, but we're looking more for the spice mix, right? So, it's bringing in together cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger, and cloves, things you'd expect from pumpkin spice. So, instead of integrating the Thai flavors into the churro itself, ChatGBT is instead recommending we create like a Thai

coconut dipping sauce. So, this necessarily wasn't where I was going for, but it's not a bad suggestion. But let's see how Gemini fares with this test. Okay, so going through the water and the sugar and the butter and eggs and stuff. Google has recommended we add some pumpkin puree, cinnamon, ginger, cloves, nutmeg, and then saying to put a Thai-inspired coating on top of the churro. So, as you can see, each chatbot gave us very different takes on a Thai-inspired churro with a pumpkin spice twist. I wouldn't say neither are necessarily bad or good. I would probably try both and probably enjoy both. But that's the thing that makes reviewing these AI chatbots a little tough, because each time you ask it a question, it can yield a completely novel answer. I'm looking to buy a mid-range turntable available in red. It doesn't have to have a phono preamp. So, let's see what chat GPT gives us. All right, so chat GPT is recommending the

project debut carbon Evo, which does come in red, as well as the U-turn audio orbit special, which also comes in red. It also recommends the regga plan R1, and I need to make sure that comes in red. Yeah, it doesn't. It only comes in white, black, and walnut. But chatbots do this sometimes, where in an attempt to answer your question, it'll just spit something out. It is also interesting that it didn't include the project debut carbon evo2, which is relatively new, also comes in red. And that was chat gbt 40. So let's see what kind of answers Gemini Advance gives us. So Gemini recommended the project debut Caron Evo. Good. Also recommended the regga plan R1 plus, but it does say it doesn't come in red. So it actually did delineate there. And then it also recommended the fluence RT82, which I believe also doesn't come in red. Yeah, the colors are natural, black, wood grain, white. So comparing to the two, it's

really hard to kind of say which one did better. Chat GPT in this instance gave more correct recommendations of turntables like Cayman red, but it did recommend one that didn't come in red and said that it did. Google Gemini Advanced recommended two that didn't come in red at all, but at least was able to tell me that it didn't. I guess Gemini Advance ultimately was more correct even though it gave less correct recommendations. Now to travel recommendations. Generally, these chatbots are going to be pretty good with itineraries for New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo. So to really test these chatbots, I kind of throw random little towns at them and see what they can yield. So one of our co-workers, Karen, she hails from Festus, Missouri, which is a small town. And let's ask ChatGPT to give us a travel itinerary for Festus, Missouri. Yeah, so on ChatGPT, it gave a decent itinerary for what to do in Festus, Missouri, a town of

about 10,000 people, according to Kin, having breakfast at the main and Mill Brewing Company is a little bizarre considering it's a brew house. The mid-morning going to the FES City Park seems okay, and then for lunch, going to La Pachanga Mexican restaurant. It's the place she's been to, and she likes so the recommendations while maybe not most magnanimous. It seems to be generally accurate. Gemini is telling us to go to the holiday and express, and then it's telling us to head over to the Jefferson National Expansion Museum in nearby St. Louis. So, it's already pulling us away from Festus, which is fine, I guess. And then for restaurants, it's telling us to go to the Pasta House Company, which is a local favorite, as well as the M State Historic Site. This is also a place that's not in Festus specifically, but in a nearby town. Google is definitely like looking to go to areas around Festus, Missouri, but overall, it seems like they

both have similar results, telling you to go to places near and around the area. So, one of the great things about AI is using it to minimize some of the busy work that comes in our lives, such as writing emails. So, I usually do a pretty basic test to write an email where I'll ask it to write my manager a simple request to take the day off for a religious holiday or something like that, and to write it in a manner that's professional yet fun and festive. They all seem to do a pretty good job on this. The email that ChatGPT gave us has the right amount of exclamation marks and has the tone of something that's a bit more casual. It also adds some emojis, which is a nice touch. Gemini is a bit more religious. It starts with the Eid Mubarak header, and it says that Eid is coming up. Definitely has all the exclamation marks that you would want. Then, it also gives the recommendation to bring baklava and halwa for my co-workers.

and say I'm hoping you can improve my request. No emojis though, but either way, they're both fine. Earlier, I published a review of a new video game about 1,600 words, so a bit of a long review, right? So let me see. I'll just ask Chad you to summarize this article for me. So summarize this article for me. I'm just going to paste the entire article, and it's actually outputting pretty quickly as well. This is an accurate summary. It definitely borrows a lot of my language, so it definitely is like taking my words and just kind of cutting out a lot of the, I wouldn't say fluff, but a lot of the more important contextual information. It's weird that it says the game has been praised for its polished gameplay. I guess suggesting like larger discussions within the gaming industry or so. Maybe it would have been more accurate to say this game was praised by the author for its polished gameplay. For example, it did get some of my feelings about the

game like overall. The reviewer seems to have mixed feelings about the game, but yeah, I mean, it's a good short summary. Both are doing a pretty decent job of summarizing art if you paste it in its entirety. So, what did we learn testing out both ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced? We found that testing AI chatbots can be tricky. The answers that you get earlier in the day can differ from what you get later in the day, and that's just kind of the nature of the beast. Each time you ask a question, it's going to give you a different answer. Between the two, I did find that ChatGPT tends to give you more verbose responses, maybe sounds a bit smarter. They both made mistakes, they both gave incorrect information or less incorrect information. Ultimately, though, ChatGPT seems to be the one to beat.

OpenAI's ChatGPT Plus vs Google's Gemini Advanced. Which $20 AI chatbot is best?

CNET is the premier destination for explaining and navigating the changing world around us. Through news, product reviews, price comparisons, and more, we’ll tell you what’s new in the parts of modern life that increasingly matter more — from health, home, and money to tech, culture, and climate — and how to get the most out of them.

CNET

Comparing OpenAI Chat GPT Plus and Google's Gemini Advanced AI

The battle tests the two AI chatbots using real-world scenarios for a fair comparison.

Both subscriptions cost $20 a month, but they offer different features and have varying context window capacities.

The chatbots are challenged with fusion recipes to test their ability to pull in and combine different data sets.

Comparing AI Chatbots for Churro and Turntable Recommendations

The chatbots provided different takes on a Thai-inspired churro with a pumpkin spice twist.

ChatGPT recommended the Project Debut Carbon Evo and U-Turn Audio Orbit Special for a mid-range red turntable, while Gemini Advance also suggested the same turntable but noted the Regga Plan R1 Plus and Fluence RT82 didn't come in red.

Both chatbots offered unique and varied responses, making it challenging to determine a definitive answer.

Comparing Travel Itineraries for Festus, Missouri

ChatGPT provided a decent itinerary for Festus, Missouri, with recommendations like breakfast at a brew house and lunch at a local Mexican restaurant.

Google Gemini Advanced, on the other hand, pulled recommendations from nearby St.

Louis, offering a holiday stay and restaurants in adjacent towns.

While ChatGPT's suggestions were more focused on Festus, Gemini's approach of exploring the surrounding area was also valid.

AI can help minimize busy work, such as writing emails.

ChatGPT and Gemini both provide effective email drafts for requesting time off, with ChatGPT using a casual tone and emojis, while Gemini takes a more religious approach.

AI can also quickly summarize long articles, but may borrow language and miss some important contextual information.

Comparing ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced

The reviewer has mixed feelings about the game but acknowledges its decent summary.

Testing AI chatbots reveals that responses can vary throughout the day.

ChatGPT tends to provide more verbose and seemingly smarter answers, but both chatbots make mistakes and provide incorrect information.

Ultimately, ChatGPT is seen as the stronger option.