The question is, um, everything exists simultaneously. This means that my body at 10 years old also exists right now. Yes, and if I'm currently focused in this right now moment, yes, where I am 45, yes, who is driving that vehicle? My 10-year-old body right now, is it

another soul, or is it the frame of the film strip just sitting around unused? Nothing is unused, and it's not in a sense another soul, although it is because the idea is it's the soul that you were at ten, and therefore you understand that you have changed everything including your

soul to have a different perspective of yourself at the age you are now. Nothing is ever unoccupied. It's all existing simultaneously, but as you shift, everything shifts. Therefore, nothing is ever unoccupied. It's always filled with something. It's always filled with another aspect,

another point of view of all that is, but you're dealing now with a different parallel reality idea of a 10-year-old. Therefore, it's not you, it's another person having their own experience and in a sense their own soul, even though you may have temporarily

connected to it and treat it as if it was yours too. So it continues to have its own existence. Of course, it does. It's, it's creation is incredibly complex, yes, richly complex, richly not complicated but richly compromised.

Bashar What happens with our old self which exists simultaneously when we shift trough

AlienTube

The speaker proposes that all versions of oneself, across different ages, exist simultaneously.

The question is raised whether past selves are separate souls or simply unused frames of a filmstrip.

The speaker asserts that nothing is ever unoccupied; everything exists simultaneously and shifts as the individual shifts.

A past self is described as a different parallel reality with its own experience and, in a sense, its own soul.

The speaker acknowledges the complexity of this concept, describing it as 'richly complex'.