Historical Reliability of Moon Splitting Claims in Islam

The oldest claims of the moon splitting date back nearly 200 years after Muhammad's death, raising doubts about their reliability.

### The Historical Debate on the Moon Splitting and Islamic Texts
* 🌙 The earliest written reference to the moon splitting during Muhammad's time comes from a source dated around **750 AD**, nearly **200 years after his death**.
* 📜 This source, attributed to Nowak, relies on later Muslim writings that were **compiled long after the events they describe**, raising questions about their **reliability**.
* 🕰 In the 9th century, around 830 AD, Ibn Hasham edited these accounts, **removing content he deemed unfavorable or weak**, further complicating the historical narrative.
* ❓ Critics argue that there is a **lack of contemporaneous written evidence** from the time Muhammad claimed prophethood in 610 AD, which raises **doubts about the authenticity** of the moon-splitting event.
* 📖 Hadith literature, which recounts Muhammad's miracles, including the **moon splitting**, is also questioned for its **historical accuracy** and potential **fabrication to align with Quranic verses**.
* 🔍 The absence of widespread historical documentation of the moon splitting at the time, coupled with explanations that **people were asleep**, adds to the **skepticism surrounding the event**.
* 🗣 The discussion also touches on theological points, questioning the **nature of Allah's attributes** and the implications of **self-praise within Islamic texts**, leading to further debate on the **coherence of these beliefs**.
* ✝ Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes a belief in **Jesus as a source of truth and salvation**, contrasting it with the perceived **inconsistencies found in Islamic doctrine**.

Muslim Learns Muhammad Did NOT Split The Moon [Debate] | Sam Shamoun

TheArchive

The oldest written source mentioning the moon split is from Nowak, who wrote around 750 AD, 200 years after Muhammad's death.

IB Hasham edited Nowak's work in the 9th century, removing content he disliked.

There are no reliable written sources from Muhammad's time (610-623 AD) that mention the moon split, raising questions about the credibility of the later sources.

The moon verse, often associated with chapter 54:1 of the Quran, is interpreted by many Muslim scholars as a sign of the end times.

The Hadith, written during Muhammad's time, claims he split the moon with his finger, leading to questions about their authenticity and potential to explain the Quranic verse.

The lack of historical evidence for the moon splitting and the argument that many people were asleep at the time are points of contention in the debate.

The speaker questions the idea of Allah's oneness, arguing that if Allah is one, he should have only one attribute and name.

The speaker points out the contradiction in Allah using different pronouns and speaking in the plural, suggesting that this implies a greater majesty.

The speaker interprets a verse from chapter 17 as Allah praising and worshiping himself, raising questions about the nature of his oneness.

The speaker questions the concept of Allah worshiping himself, suggesting it creates confusion.

They argue that Muhammad is also responsible for this confusion and criticize the listener for not leaving the religion.

In contrast, the speaker claims that Jesus offers salvation and love, providing a way out of the confusion.