US Navy's Shipbuilding Dilemma Amidst Rising Chinese Power

The US Navy must partner with South Korea to rapidly enhance its shipbuilding capacity and maintain naval dominance.

### The Race for Naval Supremacy: U.S. and South Korea's Strategic Shipbuilding Collaboration
* 🚢 Jeongjo the Great, a next-generation warship from South Korea, exemplifies **advanced military technology**, costing only **$600 million** compared to nearly **$1 billion** for similar U.S. vessels.
* ⚓ The U.S. shipbuilding industry has drastically declined since the 1970s, with **only four shipyards remaining**, while China's navy has rapidly expanded, projected to reach **435 military vessels by 2030**.
* 🔍 A 1965 federal law prevents the U.S. Navy from purchasing ships abroad, inadvertently allowing China to **strengthen its naval capabilities** and **challenge U.S. dominance**.
* 🇰🇷 South Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries, the world's largest shipyard, is recognized for its **efficiency and expertise** in building military vessels, producing ships in **18 months** compared to **28 months** in the U.S.
* 🛠 U.S. naval officials are seeking to replicate South Korea's successful shipbuilding practices and have initiated agreements for U.S. naval hull repairs in South Korea to **enhance operational efficiency**.
* 📈 Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Carlos Del Toro, emphasizes the need to **revitalize American shipyards** to remain competitive and maintain naval capabilities amid rising tensions, particularly over **Taiwan**.
* ⏳ As the U.S. faces challenges in fleet size and readiness, experts warn that while **technological superiority exists**, sheer numbers are crucial in potential conflicts, making **immediate action essential**.
* 🌏 Ultimately, the U.S. must explore **international partnerships and innovative strategies** to prevent falling behind in the evolving landscape of **global naval power**.

(suspenseful music) - [Timothy] This is Jeongjo the Great, a next-generation warship made in South Korea. (speaker speaking in foreign language) (cannon popping) (alarm buzzing) - It's one of the most powerful of its kind, and it cost only $600 million to build. A similar ship would cost almost a billion dollars more to construct in the US. The cost of building a warship in the US has soared, while production times have slowed to a crawl after decades of de-industrialization left America with only a handful of shipyards. Meanwhile, its strategic rival, China, has turned out hundreds of new ships, now commanding the world's largest and fastest-growing navy. Now, the US is looking to Asia's shipyards to help close that gap as the two superpowers move closer to a potential conflict. (suspenseful music) In the 1970s, the US shipbuilding industry

had 13 public shipyards operating across the country, building about 5% of the world's tonnage. Today, only four yards are still in operation. The Navy has been prevented from buying or constructing new ships abroad by a 1965 amendment to federal law. And that has allowed China to set a course to one day end US naval dominance. Beijing is now the top global ship maker by a wide margin. Giant Chinese firms that crank out merchant ships for the world are often the same ones building warships for China's navy. Less than a decade ago, the US Navy held more battle force ships compared to China. Since then, China's fleet has rapidly overtaken the US Navy and is projected to have 435 military vessels by 2030, outsizing the US by over a third. Officials are now in a race against time to stop that from happening. While the Navy can't buy ships from abroad,

It can import expertise. And if there is one place that can rival China's shipbuilding prowess, it's South Korea. The country is a leader in shipbuilding, specializing in high-end military vessels and large commercial ships. Much of that work takes place here at the largest shipyard in the world, operated by Hyundai Heavy Industries. Each year, dozens of military and commercial ships are built here. And the US Navy sees this as one answer to a vexing problem, how to catch up with China. Jeongjo the Great is the first of several new destroyers Hyundai is building. The US is prohibited from buying these vessels directly, but naval officials want to replicate how Hyundai makes them at a fraction of the cost. (suspenseful music) The ship measures more than 550 feet and can carry up to 300 crew. It's fitted with a weapon system that has a detection range of about 500 miles and can track over 1,000 targets at once.

The ship has a vertical launch system capable of firing missiles at targets in the air or on land. Expanded sonar capabilities allow the vessel to detect submarines at a range far greater than older destroyers. - We have a hexagon radar up there. That radar is very powerful. So once North Korea launched a missile, that radar can detect in less than seconds. - America has a fleet of ships just like this. But what makes this one different being built here in Korea? - We can build a ship in a very cost-effective way. We have a very healthy and reliable marine industry around us. We can control the cost, and we are adapting the very good shipbuilding and technology from our mainstream yard. - [Timothy] Hyundai's military ships are built in the same yard as the company's commercial vessels, where about 40 to 50 hulls are built each year. It means the company can build a destroyer in just 18 months, significantly faster

than the 28 months it would take in the US. - We are sharing all the shipbuilding technology from the commercial shipbuilding. We share all the new technology for improving the productivity for the shipbuilding, so that also makes us very efficient. - [Timothy] That efficiency is what US naval officials are hoping to replicate. Secretary of the US Navy, Carlos Del Toro, traveled to Asia as part of a pitch to shipbuilders to help revive American shipyards. - We shut down many shipyards in this country, thinking that we would not need them. We became less competitive. Because of that, our building of our naval capabilities, of our naval ships, has become far more expensive, because there are far fewer shipyards that actually build our navy ships. - [Timothy] Once those vessels are built, analysts say that in a prolonged conflict, maintaining the fleet near the battle space is key. (alarm buzzing)

(missile exploding) Hyundai Heavy Industries recently signed an agreement to allow US naval hulls to be repaired in South Korea. This will allow US vessels in need of repair to stay in Asia instead of making the lengthy journey back to American shipyards. - You are looking at the Chinese having greater availability of ships. That's also a geographical advantage that China faces of where they should maintain, repair, overhaul the ships. You don't want to have a battle out there in the Philippine Sea, and then you have to retire all the way to Guam or even all the way to stateside. Then, you will leave a gap where you have no ships or too few ships to make any difference in the theater. - [Timothy] Hyundai Heavy Industries will soon help start training shipbuilding engineers in the US. But these measures may not meet the need to revive the US Navy, and South Korea's prowess can't easily be replicated.

- Mainly, the engineering, procurement, construction, and integration, so all has to be aligned and well balanced. So we cannot build a ship just engineering is powerful, all has to harmonize together. - [Timothy] America's efforts to revitalize its shipbuilding capacity has taken on a new urgency as tensions rise over Taiwan. Beijing claims the self-ruled island as part of its territory, and is threatening to take control by force if necessary. America's naval superiority is a deterrent to a Chinese invasion as long as it can be maintained. - Assuming that there's not just a Taiwan conflict, but assuming there is also conflict elsewhere. The ongoing availability issues for the US Navy to concentrate enough forces in the theater while having to take care of other regions, it will be a huge stretch. It doesn't mean the US will not win a conflict over Taiwan, but then the question is, at what cost?

- [Timothy] While the US Navy is technologically superior to its Chinese rival, naval strategists argue that fleet size also matters. The bigger, the better. The clock is ticking for the US to increase its number of warships, but the laws designed to protect America's shipbuilders have backed the Navy into a corner. The US will need to look beyond its shores if it is to avoid falling irreversibly behind in a new era of great power competition. (suspenseful music)

Inside the Military Shipyard Helping the U.S. Catch up to China's Navy | WSJ

The Wall Street Journal takes you inside carefully selected stories and events in a visually captivating way so you can dig deeper into the news and insights that matter to you. 

The Wall Street Journal

South Korea's Jeongjo the Great: A Game Changer in Naval Power

The Jeongjo the Great is a next-generation warship from South Korea, costing $600 million, significantly less than its US counterpart.

The US shipbuilding industry has drastically declined, with only four public shipyards remaining, while China has rapidly expanded its navy, now commanding the largest fleet.

The US is now looking to Asia's shipyards for help in closing the gap with China, which is projected to have 435 military vessels by 2030, outpacing the US.

South Korea is a leader in shipbuilding, specializing in high-end military vessels and large commercial ships, with Hyundai Heavy Industries operating the world's largest shipyard.

The US Navy aims to replicate Hyundai's cost-effective shipbuilding methods to catch up with China's naval power.

The new destroyer, Jeongjo the Great, features advanced weapon and detection systems, with the ability to track multiple targets and detect submarines from greater distances, all while being built in just 18 months.

US Navy's Shipbuilding Challenges and Solutions

The US is struggling with a shortage of shipyards, leading to increased costs and longer build times for naval vessels.

South Korea's shipbuilding efficiency and technology sharing are being leveraged to support the US Navy, with agreements for hull repairs and training engineers.

However, these measures may not be enough to fully revive the US Navy's capabilities.

America's Urgent Shipbuilding Revitalization

The alignment of engineering, procurement, construction, and integration is crucial for shipbuilding.

Rising tensions over Taiwan have intensified America's efforts to boost its naval capacity, but maintaining naval superiority while addressing conflicts in other regions is a challenge.

The US Navy's technological edge over China is important, but fleet size also plays a significant role, leading to the need for the US to expand its warship numbers and look beyond its shores for support.