Political Legislation: Monopolitics Game and Elite Interests

Political legislation in Indonesia lacks public interest, influenced by party bosses, with little transparency, causing public suspicion and dissatisfaction.

### The Monopolitics of Indonesian Legislation: Elite Interests vs. Public Perception
* 💼 The game "Monopolitics" is a modified version of Monopoly, played by political figures to **discuss legislative issues**.
* 🏛 The first topic of discussion is the **potential expansion of Indonesia's cabinet**, which is seen as a way to **accommodate various political interests**.
* 💰 The participants discuss the balance between **political coalition-building** and **public service** in cabinet appointments.
* 📜 The conversation then shifts to the rushed legislative process at the end of the parliamentary term, raising concerns about **elite-driven decision-making**.
* 🧑 The participants acknowledge the challenges of legislative politics, with one member highlighting the need for **genuine representation**.
* 🏛 A controversial statement by a member of the House of Representatives about **legalizing political manipulation** sparks further debate.
* 🔍 The discussion reveals tensions between **elite interests**, **public perception**, and the need for **genuine representation** in Indonesian politics.
* 🔮 The outcome of these discussions will shape **public trust in the legislative process and political institutions** in Indonesia.

### The Dangers of Money Politics in Indonesia: A Case Study
* 💰 "This country's elected officials, who become members of the council, governors, regents, mayors, and even the president, do not use money politics; they all use **this is the danger of money politics**."
* 🗳 A council member from Indonesia shared a success story of being elected three times without using **money politics**, despite the prevalent practice in the country.
* 💵 The council member highlighted the challenges of running for office without participating in money politics, as it is commonly believed that **candidates need significant financial resources to win elections**.
* 🏛 The discussion also touched on the potential impact of political dynasties, with differing opinions on whether they are **harmful or acceptable in a democracy**.
* 👨 There was debate about President Jokowi's potential involvement in political dynasties, with some expressing concerns about the **implications for democracy**.
* 📊 The council member emphasized the importance of **public perception and satisfaction** in politics, particularly in relation to **infrastructure development and social assistance programs**.
* 🤝 The discussion also touched on the relationship between President Jokowi and Prabowo, suggesting a **deep bond** that some believe could **benefit the country**.
* 🇮🇩 Overall, the conversation highlighted the **complex and nuanced nature of Indonesian politics**, with diverse opinions on issues such as **money politics, political dynasties, and leadership succession**.

Main Monopoli(tik) sambil Ngobrolin Jokowi, Jatah Menteri, dan Money Politik | Mata Najwa

Najwa Shihab

The Game of Monopolitics: A Political Discussion

The game "Monopolitics" is a modified version of Monopoly used to discuss current political issues.

The players, including politicians and a director of political parameters, discuss the potential expansion of the cabinet and the allocation of ministries in the government.

The game uses money as a way to show agreement or disagreement with the players' answers, with the winner being the one with the most money at the end.

The Expansion of the Ministerial Cabinet in Indonesia

The expansion of the ministerial cabinet is driven by the need to accommodate political interest groups and maintain a cohesive coalition relationship.

The addition of ministries is also aimed at fulfilling campaign promises, such as the implementation of a free lunch program.

This expansion is justified as a means to achieve significant new developments, but it raises concerns about budget allocation and the impact on the economy.

Concerns About Budget Allocation and Political Dynamics

The increasing number of officials in the Ministry raises concerns about a larger portion of the budget being allocated to them.

There is a debate about the appointment of deputy ministers from losing parties and the need for self-criticism within political parties.

The sudden rush to revise laws, especially towards the end of the term, is causing suspicion and criticism from the public regarding the motives behind these actions.

Criticisms and Challenges in the Legislative Process

The lack of a spokesperson for the DPR hinders communication of their decisions to the public, leading to external criticism.

Political decisions often prioritize party interests over the needs of the community, raising concerns about the meaningfulness of the legislative process.

The legislative process is viewed with skepticism, with rushed and potentially hidden agendas, creating doubts about the maturity and validity of the discussions.

The Dangerous Impact of Legalizing Political Manipulation

A member of the Indonesian House of Representatives suggested legalizing political manipulation using money, which goes against the Election Law and threatens the fairness of the political process.

This statement raises the risk of allowing politics to be controlled by the wealthy, undermining the representation of the poor and marginalized.

The potential normalization of money politics could have a detrimental impact on the democratic principles of fair representation and equal participation.

The Complexities of Political Money and Influence

Candidates use various forms of assistance, including money and goods, to influence voters, leading to a call for the legalization of political money.

The significant amount of money spent by council members raises concerns about fair competition and voter influence.

Jokowi's high public approval raises questions about his future role and the depth of his relationship with Prabowo.

Proposal for the Establishment of a Supreme Advisory Council

A suggestion has been made to establish a Supreme Advisory Council with Mr.

Jokowi as the chairman to provide guidance to the governments of Mr.

Gibran, involving religious and national figures.

The discussion involves the potential positive impact of Mr.

Jokowi's continued strategic role in the country and addresses the debate around political dynasties and nepotism.

The proposal also highlights the factors contributing to public satisfaction with Jokowi, focusing on infrastructure, social assistance, and potential considerations for his legacy.

The Complexity of Party Loyalty and Appreciation in Indonesian Politics

The loyalty of political figures in Indonesia is closely tied to the appreciation they receive.

President Jokowi is seen as deserving a high score due to his loyalty and the appreciation he garners.

The discussion also involves the potential candidacy of Jokowi's son and the impact of public opinion on political decisions.

The Influence of PDIP and Political Beliefs in Indonesia

Gibran, as a PDIP cadre, holds influence, especially in areas where the party is not well-known.

Despite qualitative discussions on democracy and dynasty politics, the public's belief in political figures like Prabowo and Gibran remains strong.

The conversation highlights the struggle for trust and the impact of engaging with the public for electoral success.

Comedian's Intention and Political Commentary

The comedian discusses his 13-year career and his intentions for the future, including a tour across Indonesia.

He also talks about the impact of majority coalitions on democracy and the danger of political dynasties and corruption.

The discussion touches on the lack of diverse opinions in politics and the need for critical attitudes and checks.