Dolores Cannon: Analyzing Truth and Belief in Regression

John was the organizer but cautioned against accepting any belief as absolute truth.

### The Imperfections of Spiritual Texts: A Critical Look at Dolores Cannon's Work
* 📚 Dolores Cannon described John as a **key organizer among the disciples**, responsible for **arranging meetings and accommodations**, a role he confirms he undertook **alongside his brother**.
* 🤔 While he appreciates many aspects of Cannon's writings, he emphasizes that they are **filtered through her personal perspective**, leading to **potential inaccuracies**.
* 💬 He specifically disagrees with her portrayal of the Essenes, arguing that **historical evidence contradicts her claims** about their association with Joshua.
* 🔍 He stresses the importance of **empirical evidence and multiple perspectives** in validating spiritual experiences, noting that Cannon's methods may have **limited her findings**.
* 🔄 His own regression experience was shaped by a different hypnotherapist, who used **open-ended questions to avoid leading him**, contrasting with what he perceives in Cannon's approach.
* 🧠 He warns against accepting any spiritual text as infallible, encouraging individuals to **seek their own truths** and recognize that **all information is subject to personal interpretation**.
* 🌍 He concludes by urging viewers to **engage with these topics and share their thoughts**, fostering a community that **critically examines spiritual beliefs and practices**.

Okay, here's the video that a lot of people have been curious about, and uh, I figure it's time to finally do it. In her book, Dolores Cannon said that John was the disciple who would usually organize things, going ahead of the group and making sure some rooms were

available and needs were taken care of. A PR person if you will. Do you recall taking on this, these tasks? Um, now I've said on several other videos that I was the one who would go to the, me and my brother, who actually would go forward and set up rooms and

set up and find uh, housing and lodging, and and set up meetings and find the people who wanted to hear his message. So, yes, but there's a bigger, par, bigger thing in this video that I want to address, and that is Dolores Cannon. [Music]

Dolores Cannon is an interesting and interesting author to me. Many people think that everything that she wrote is perfect and and absolute factual truth, but just like every other text, every other new age dogma, everything that she wrote about came through Dolores Cannon's filter.

And and in coming through Dolores Cannon's filter, it has the imperfections of Dolores Cannon. As in anything that comes from me, as the imperfections of John. Um, I I have read almost everything she's written because I'm fascinated by it. I think

it's very interesting. There's there's things in her books that I 100% agree with, including this one of going ahead and and setting things up and doing all that. I totally agree with that. Her whole thing about the Essenes, I completely disagree with.

because she her writings talk about you know that was that was the encampment that was where Joshua did his stuff that was all this stuff and she really lays it out as if Joshua was in the scene and Joshua was not in the scene I

remember very clearly avoiding the scenes because they were zealots they were the ones who wanted to start a war and in fact if you look historically the first armed conflict with Rome was led by John the Essene and so when I see her her writings

I go okay so that doesn't ring true for me at all and then people want to argue well that's what she said because she must be infallible well it's just creating a new dogma just like people think the Bible's infallible

whether the Quran's infallible or you know the Bhagavad-Gita is infallible and it's just new it's just a new age religion now it's becoming a new age religion and it's very interesting because when you

break out of the spirituality aspects of it you go into the scientific side of it the empirical evidence is dependent on multiple points of view so in other words the same evidence has to be found from multiple sources um and usually what that is is different scientists

doing those things um and so the learners kind of have real strict belief that her she would only work with people that she was the only person who progressed them and how do I know this because I asked her to regress me and she turned me down because I had

already been regressed so she was working within this construct of only her information, she was not bringing in anything else to verify or corroborate it. It was it was her own funnel. Now any any good, uh, not to say she wasn't good, but any good

hypnotherapist will tell you that it's better to have multiple hypnotherapists because of the fact that a hypnotherapist can in fact, through just the inflection of words, can put in a belief, can put in their personal beliefs into a

regression. That's why I specifically went and and searched out the people, the people who regressed me because I wanted someone who was certified, someone who was who was knowledgeable in lots of things and wasn't destined or or predisposed to one, so

and when you hear my regression, it's it's it's interesting because she very much is like leading me places without leading me, if that if I mean, she's not giving me things to think or say, you know, what what do you see? She's asking these

questions that are completely open-ended so that the experience is my own, not someone else's. And I I think after hearing her first few regressions, I think that Dolores herself ended up getting some specific beliefs that ended up becoming infused into later regressions.

And I think I really do believe that that the that she was very well intentioned and very really [Music] um, you're trying to do good work, but I just think that her method was flawed, um, because empirical evidence depends on different studies, multiple studies.

and it's the same with regressions that truth depends on multiple regressions from multiple people to verify its authenticity and to specifically filter out the uh beliefs of other regressionists so that's really kind of um my thought on this but

did he did John go ahead go ahead I remember this we would come to we would we would travel together we would come to the outskirts of a town we'd camp on the outskirts of the town John and James would go into the town would set up

housing food meetings healing sessions and when I say healing sessions I mean places where people come and take their faith and heal themselves and so yeah John was the PR guy just like Dolores Cannon said but I I don't think you should take anybody

at their word I think you should only go by what you feel is true and if what I'm saying doesn't feel true to you that is your reality that is your truth follow your truth not anybody else's truth and and realize that every piece of information you read has

been filtered through somebody's physical world mind and that you need to come to your own belief systems about the the things they're saying rather than taking everything as uh infallible fact so that's my thought on on that you guys have a great day and I'll talk to you

soon see you bye thank you my friends for watching this video if you enjoyed it please make sure that you've subscribed and you like it you share it but also comment below it let's get this community talking about these topics and and spreading this information out far and wide so we can

Change the world for the better. Thank you.

The Legacy of Dolores Cannon: My Thoughts

John of New

John's Role in Jesus' Ministry and Dolores Cannon's Account

Introduction of the topic and Dolores Cannon's claim about John's organizational role.

Speaker's personal account of his role in organizing logistics for Jesus' ministry.

Transition to the main focus: critical analysis of Dolores Cannon's work.

Acknowledges Cannon's popularity but emphasizes the subjective nature of her writings.

Speaker's personal experience with Cannon's work; agreement and disagreement on specific points.

Strong disagreement with Cannon's portrayal of the Essenes and Joshua's involvement.

Historical counter-arguments to Cannon's claims about the Essenes and armed conflict.

Critique of the tendency to treat Cannon's work as infallible, comparing it to other religious texts.

Importance of empirical evidence and multiple perspectives for verification.

Discussion of Cannon's methodology and limitations.

Personal anecdote about Cannon's refusal to regress the speaker due to prior regression experience.

Importance of multiple hypnotherapists for unbiased regressions.

Potential influence of hypnotherapist's beliefs on regression results.

Speaker's approach to finding a qualified and unbiased hypnotherapist.

Description of the speaker's regression experience and the importance of open-ended questions.

Suggestion that Cannon's own beliefs influenced later regressions.

Reiteration of the importance of multiple studies and regressions for verification.

Summary of the speaker's perspective on Dolores Cannon's work.

Confirmation of John's logistical role in the ministry, aligning with Cannon's account.

Emphasis on personal discernment and following one's own truth.

Encouragement to critically evaluate information and develop personal belief systems.

Call to subscribe, like, share, and comment on the video.

Closing remarks and thank you to viewers.