[MUSIC] Ha, huh, that [MUSIC]. Please write it. Haha. Now, at this moment, well, on the right side, um, yes. Now, we like it a lot, so it seems good, but a very big issue made with a list of 194 colors like this will occur. We need to provide this to show it now. Our generous museum director has to hold this grateful king until the end. Should we bring it out and show it now? Yes. The topic I'm talking about this time is about well-done glutinous rice. But I gave a lecture on Zhu Xi at BS. Some people wrote it a lot. Our family members don't watch well, but it spread a lot. So, I thought, You, a major in Zhu Xi, know it, but actually, I'm not a major in Zhu Xi. But if I say I'm a major in Zhu Xi, it means that I'm a major in Changsha. I don't trust it well because Changsha wrote Zhu Xi, so I don't buy books well, and I think I won't do that. So, I'm a major in Changsha.

There is a story to it. Yes, there is some interest in how many will be sold. So, the topic is quite strong, actually. Did you talk about the story of number 4? In a way, my wife may find it easier to understand the eldest son. That's why I received a doctorate for just that. Oh, but even though others may evaluate it highly, one should improve oneself. It requires a lot of effort. So, I feel a bit full already. In China, there are 10 parts. Why do we add more these days? I will live with the emperor and my father. We will spend about one hour together. You might think like this, but it's not enough. We are doing a little bit of a ceremony. We usually refer to the eldest son. So,

I understand the calm tea music. Just like in the case of Jangja's life philosophy, it's not about just following what Jangja, the eldest son, believes in. It's not about learning the contents of traffic. It's not about learning it gradually over time. No, we learn it by not doing that. So, we gathered not to study Jansa with five people, but to study it with people. But studying philosophy is somehow more determined and better for you. So we use Jangja. We study philosophy using Tanche. Just like studying a car using a handshake, studying tea using a cup. So, with the idea of telling a good story, why did we have to study attachment? Why is it important to study philosophy? To put it in extreme terms, in Pyongyang, there was no philosophy or chemistry.

That's a shocking story. So, when talking about our daughter, when she was younger, sharing the story of Asia, starting from opium, helps us understand ourselves better today. Talking about the Opium War, what is this painful present? It's about Western attempts to completely dominate the East, right? By planning the Opium War, Westerners tried to completely subjugate the East for their own benefit. Why do I emphasize that the West dominated the East in every aspect? In the past, people thought the East developed in terms of decoration skills, while the West developed in terms of material civilization. So, we tend to think that we are overly materialistic. This is a big mistake. Material civilization and spiritual destiny exist within the same framework. If material civilization is emphasized too much, it becomes a limitation, but when it is revealed outwardly, it has a spiritual meaning. So, the excessive emphasis on material civilization...

In the media, the spiritual civilization is different from the material civilization. Therefore, the concept of civilization and spirituality are one. So, the statement that the East and the West had complete victory and complete defeat as a result of this war means that in terms of spiritual and material aspects, they both experienced complete defeat and complete victory. Even if we say this, it doesn't make a big difference. What China has gone through is followed by what Japan has gone through. All of this is about the struggle to overcome the West. We need to find why we used the weapons that the West used. When we look into whether there is something in our society, we find that there is something in the West but not in the East. One is called ban and the other needs to be seen. So, we need to make it easy for everyone to understand and repeat it twice for clarity.

It could be said that China, which developed its own unique culture, could dominate the trend of the East and completely overwhelm the West. However, there are representative inventions symbolizing Chinese civilization that overwhelmingly dominated life and then held overwhelming superiority through the three elements. There are various inventions such as gunpowder, compass, and paper, which greatly increased the efficiency of life. Gunpowder was used for military purposes, making it easier to fight wars. In addition, the compass made it easier to navigate, and paper led to the spread of knowledge. As a result, it can be said that life improved significantly due to these inventions.

Then, what is toothpaste? It will be made in each country, and later, it will change to 10 o'clock specification and become like 2 toothpaste. For example, there are many toothpastes in China, right? And what else is there? Okay, only this side. So, with this, the performances are these. These are not science. It's like making a gun out of a stick, not chemistry. But, you need that to make something. This is not science, not science. It's not a gun, it's not Guam. This is not reading, it's about what's there. It's about making it in two dimensions, not three dimensions. It's called Walak. It's about developing a scientific worldview, a pretty big difference, recording the investigation. What's written is turned into a telescope. Cipher, folks. Now, is the earth flat or round? It was like this. No, it's flat, so walk. China is in trouble.

Many of us may not feel like we are moving forward even if we look at a day, unable to go out. When we are in society, do companies also exist? So, we just let it go or hold onto it. The Earth is round, comfortable, and convenient after all. Even if I think about it, it feels comfortable. I also think quickly. I can't understand why some people think the Earth is flat. But you guys are like animals right now. Why did you think it was round? It's not like that, right? Another thing is, do you help others? Are you feeling scared now? After retirement, money is going out. Isn't the Earth round based on our experience? Yes, that's right. But why do we think that people who think about money are more successful in the world? They don't see that the Earth is not flat. People who think that way are 3 years old.

Living a confident life on Earth, the fourth planet, gives more strength and help to one person. Yes, that's right. Those who know what is flat and what is not will do endless good deeds. Those who say the Earth is round will face bigger problems. Why am I not able to rely on anyone else? Because the Earth is not flat but round. It doesn't lean on anyone. The Earth is spinning without leaning on anything. By knowing this, a sense of awe arises. When you go beyond a common sense perspective, you can see something that has been outside of scientific vision. By allowing you to see beyond common sense, things that are confirmed through experience are not confirmed by the geometry of science. It's confirmed by the experience on the riverbank. The compass is the experience of spinning. Things that happen within sensory experience are basically sensory experiences, not confirmed by the geometry of science.

It reacts to what is there, subtly moving towards what is not there. Oh, the elderly know what is not there. Right now, there is a technological society that has not gone through the crow's passage yet. This investigation only comes to the environment in the seventh world. Before the birth of the perfect Nietzsche, there was a person who said, What does a 15-year-old know? He is someone who said that the Earth sees the sun. He said that the sun revolves around the Earth. Even before that, these people, these journalists, believed that the sun revolves around the Earth. It seems possible to think that the sun revolves around the Earth. It seems more accurate in that direction. That's right. Even though I am operating with a peaceful heart, I don't feel a thing. I will have to do it. But, the 15-year-old perfect Nietzsche, is he taking care of the fetus or not? My friend who is concerned about this is like a poison. He always says things like this. It's such a ridiculous contradiction.

So, 1가들다, love is a matter of the heart, if you say it's science, you can look up in the dictionary what you can control. Science is about understanding the world systematically, about understanding the world, about books, about the world, about the world's books. Here, the key is that three things cannot be separated. Responsibility is that the system has power. This needs to be understood truly. You must do it. You must explain the system. Now, what can be said about the world as a system is just something that can be said. These three things, what is the world itself? What is it to conclude? What is the world? These three things are what people attach to, the companies that have been attached to them. The things that are specifically there before are systematically assumed. It's just a summary. It's just there. But humans can explain this world with a purpose.

This is the beginning of the explanation. So, this 2-year-old human didn't just leave this world with writers, but kept trying to live more and more. Why are you trying to explain? It's better to have the ability to describe a specific world rather than just accepting three abstract things. Yes, yes, that's right. It was about having the ability to explain. Understanding the ability to explain is more important than explaining. Discovering the order and rules within it and explaining it is much more important. Principles and rules like this are originally called systems. So, giving order to the world that was initially accepted systematically and explaining it is a scientific ability. Even if it is exaggerated, it is to have the habit of contacting with three. So, having the habit of explaining the world. Because there is a habit of explaining the world, that's why science did not develop, and reason did not occur. So, it is the habit of living in the world.

The ability to contact the world in a white event is possible three times. Just habitually pretending is what you're thinking, right? So, if you want to explain the world, what should you do first? You need to live and experience it. What should you do first to explain it from what you've lived? You need to see it. You have to challenge that you can't explain the Hwayang flower. But you just have to see it. If Cha Se-hee doesn't look closely at the web service, she can't explain it. Look closely. So, what is the first thing you need to do to have it? That is looking closely. What is looking closely? Then, if you look closely, you understand. So, I just went to the neighborhood to hear the sound for that. So, let's talk a little more.

I made it without any complaints. What do you think? Like the observation, it went into gray. If you observe a half day, you can have a system to live in the world. What abilities did you feel are needed to have responsibilities for businesses and systems to have responsibilities? Life has become a game. There is an observation. People with the ability to understand ordinary people deeply and sensitively. People like that become scientists, artists, or philosophers. Where does the intention come from? It doesn't come from observation. Then, what makes people who develop scientific civilizations stronger in terms of justification? I just helped with the vehicle. What kind of person is someone who doesn't use their observational abilities? Compassionate people are just ordinary people. They are people in terms of accomplishments. They are just people. Just living and living a little more vigorously. That's just living; it goes like that.

At the cost of 40,000 won, we have divided the victory and defeat of the East and West completely due to the Opium War. This statement about observation is a loss in 3 games. There is no difference in observation, it's interesting. So, we need to look at what is more important, whether there is observation or not. Humans interact with the world in four ways. Speaking more than three foreign languages, including me, is part of having three things. By responding in various ways to the world in this world's various ways, then what is the problem with responding in various ways? Who responds more efficiently can become the most central issue. What is the purpose of human life? Why did humans come to live outside of humanity? The answer is that such rituals should not be done; we should not do such rituals. How did we do it in a sequential way from the 6th sentence of our mother? Living as a human being is the purpose of love itself. All the events in this world are not young.

Different things, Tegye is existence for the sake of a single thing, now, in relation to other things, living in such a relationship, this is, at least, it was said that it is a theory of survival in itself. The scene of survival is when something happens. So, if living itself is doing something, then it doesn't exist in the 3rd dimension. So, all the things that humans know increase the quality and quantity in this life and death, increasing the quality and quantity before the victory has become a welfare. Why do we drink coffee? We drink coffee to increase the quality and quantity before the injury. Why do we have grains? Why not have the second type at 1 p.m.? If you sit and take responsibility for the quality and quantity of survival, why not sit here? If you don't sit here, the quality and quantity of survival will increase. So, the problem is that everyone who organizes the world of quantity 2 is...

Increasing the quality and quantity of survival activities like the Han River, but among the two that increase the quality and quantity of life before death, what is the most effective way to go to this world? It is related to the experience aspect. Scientifically, doing it together is a sudden thing. Scientifically related, doing one scientific thing is not a good thing. The problem is, as I briefly mentioned earlier, this book is not about reminiscing about experiences. In the book, what can you do, what can't you do, what can you do at the hospital yesterday, what can't you do, can you combine the system? No, you can't. You can experience it, but what can you do in the book? You can think about it. The calculation of life, explaining the reversal of human reasoning, has the ability of 4u vertically and the ability of sensory-type cancer. There are social skills 3, and going back a little further.

Being flat now is experienced by coming to the results of society. Maybe I am integrated with the river, and a friend being round is the result of each business, so life will be the result of society. So, when a person knows the light, they are more systematic than a person who doesn't say the light is flat. Healing itself. So, I think things like philosophy and science are probably among the ways to increase quality and quantity before society. Is it very high? Yes. Therefore, philosophy, like science, is the most significant way to relate to the world. If you look a little closer to the content of this book, it is ideology if you put the content of the book under four. So, if you live for two months, a person who lives for two months is much more efficient than a person who lives for four years in terms of ideology and inner life.

Living with a high level of consciousness allows us to improve both quality and quantity in our lives. After we finish studying science and philosophy together, we must focus on what we should study next. Until now, we have been living chemically and philosophically, not being able to fully live or fully die. Not being able to fully live means not being able to live philosophically and scientifically. Life is not systematic, it is not about experiences, it is not about personal experiences. The reason why we gather here to study together is to write down the most important reason, what is it? I didn't like the fourth inning of the game. Should we arm ourselves with new gestures now? Should we transition from a life based on past experiences and technical expertise to a scientific and systematic life?

Isn't it common sense? Otherwise, what would happen there? Will I have to bow down to philosophical and scientific arrogance in that position? It's not acceptable. Why do I have to buy makeup if it doesn't suit me at all? The reason for this complete twist is what? Trapped in the experience and skills of the riverbank, it's impossible to overcome those who live in the fur of philosophy and science. In this case, the source. So, China proceeded steadily through this process, while Japan quickly passed, and Korea couldn't proceed. Did you eat the in-flight meal? After I applied the law to Yang, what is the atmosphere of surrendering to China and Japan? It's a lifestyle cost. But why learn to surrender? What is the information on this side? Japan might not be able to resist the United States. Isn't it a vassal state? China represents the United Kingdom. Please consider the forced comparison.

Should I drink it by force and overcome people from China and Japan somehow after losing, or should I overcome them again? So, I attached myself there, the Western ship. In the dawn, while trying to overcome the dead horse, I realized that I need to learn from the West and attack. It seems like I have won in terms of human science and technology. Because I had experience with cells and battleships, so if I have a battleship and a crisis, I think I can win over the West. Will I be able to win over the dead horse? So, I stayed in the P4 and Hahn ships. The movement that the sun rises and sets is the Yang movement. By starting the Yang movement, making efforts continuously, and realizing it again, you will understand that it is not about winning just because you have the heart. If you create a good path for those things to be born and return, what is that called?

I'm back, so when I look at myself, I go into a fight. That's what Choi Dong-won is studying evil. It's normal, so I go into the 5th year of my life. As I was in the middle of a dispute, I didn't talk for long, but as I did, I realized something. There is a system that makes this possible. The idea and knowledge are essential, so it becomes possible. From then on, I focus on ethical and moral issues like a crazy person. Because you need to have a standard, you need to set an example for people. So, after being dominated by the West, China ended up trying to solve it. You have to develop your studies fiercely, so you have to prepare. After collecting sheep, then Indian law, then cultural movement, in other words, everything is boiling up sequentially. So, what I finally discovered is Confucianism and science. So, what I adopted is the practice of Nishio, in other words, I adopt the true teachings of philosophy.

So, China will congratulate this year, faster than Japan, going beyond Asia to enter the world of thought. It's not about entering the alley of traditional thoughts but about embracing Western scientific and philosophical perspectives. China also aims to learn from the West. Where did they go for promotional purposes to learn science and philosophy? Korea, in the late Joseon period, had a passive learning culture, and it is not productive to just passively learn by force or for trivial reasons. By grasping the essence, after spending 36 years under Japanese colonial rule, we have been learning from Japan until now. I think this means we must first learn from the mistakes of the past. They say, We can't even take ten steps without looking back. It's a fast path. Destroying by that method, one thing leads to another.

You cannot overcome stimuli without learning from them. I used to think that this attitude of learning from stimuli is not about quickly sensing and experiencing them. By sensing and experiencing them directly, you can find something clear tomorrow or even now. However, in the second lecture, because it is not ordinary, we learn to reason. Do you realize that you cannot win without learning? You will realize that you cannot win. Because this is a chemical and philosophical way of reasoning, it will disappear, so the dependence on habits and familiar things will disappear. Can you expect a better life now? Relying on autumn, plains, habits, and familiar things, I am being challenged by Chinese people like mud in an oxygen school right now.

The president speaks harsh words and says that it is inevitable that those who do not have the ability to adapt to changing times and experiences will fail. They only have familiar things, act quickly on familiar things, and focus on the surface. Perhaps the feeling of being upset, even if it hurts, may be due to the lack of ability to do anything other than resort to violence. Isn't it true that we need to step out of our comfort zone and learn from new experiences? Getting out of habits, breaking away from routines, and experiencing new things are essential. Park Jong-hwa has been appointed as a monthly contributor, and then, what should we do about his resignation? Once again, the point is not to live life without making a mark, but to interact with people meaningfully. You need to recognize this and improve your life. Look closely at this. We call this awakening. Why do we need to study cars and science now? How do we survive as a nation?

How have we lived up to now? Is it okay to just live up to this point? Is it okay to live by the river without any ambition and on a experiential and technical level? It's okay. Can we live a better life if we become a little more aware and awakened? Where is a better life than now? Talking towards Korea, it's a life of knowledge or scientific life. But we have the potential. There is potential. I should work like this. Just once, curse me. Look at the population of South Korea now. It's becoming more of a learning society. We can lead this enthusiasm for learning and bring it from the past to build a scientific and philosophical world. Do you think like that, everyone? Do you think like that? Why? Oh, you've been to the palace. Oh, oh. 222, citizens, boot up.

Oh, I went on a 3-4-0 Mongolia trip for you guys. The book is really amazing. I talked about it on Amatok. We went into the desert for about six days and talked about knives. But, if you want to see * someone you miss, look at Mongolia. This is an agreement with Japan. The author announced the proportion of one's life related to the shoulders. He expressed it like this. Since I didn't participate in many things at first, I talked about guns once, and many personally said it's good to be a sergeant in the prairie. I will pay back the draft big. Companies are on the verge of collapse. When you hit them, they will be done. Is this my first time? It would be nice to become a sergeant in the morning. But when I talked about the original story, I saw that the study was in progress, and when I looked at the car that had been repaired, it was wrapped in vinyl for the first time, and I experienced a lot of depression.

I brought it, but when I see it hanging like a star, how should I take it or what should I do with the three or four extensions? Those three or four will become longer with the English that I brought. I took a bus for 40 minutes with four friends, and when I went to a strange place, if there are not many tools, I combine a few tools that I have and figure out how to do it. It's really amazing. However, I lived my life in a U.S. military base, not because I was good at English, but at that time, I was a child. That's why I bought it, and so I lived in the U.S., traveled, and read articles about the U.S. well, not because I like it personally, but to see how those people do it. But the U.S. articles are all about tools, right? I watched it. However, with a big applause, if you have the tools, you can fix it, but when you see it being fixed, even your hands are a bit of a business, so you need to educate people.

Do it, and there's no tool that fits perfectly in the size of the damage. If there's no tool, there's nothing. When Mongolian bus drivers meet others, there's nothing. So, in the U.S., if a person doesn't have a perfect match, they can't do it. That's why, whenever I see Isabelle in the U.S., she looks like she's trying to solve something. I sometimes think about how to live and eat. But, for someone who earns money, everything is smooth. It's like pulling a boat well. So, I compared it like this. Also, when comparing like this, I had a big thought. In our country, sometimes people say things like, Can a Korean be more successful than an American, Japanese, or Chinese person? However, when a Mongolian bus driver tries to compare himself with a U.S. bus driver, it goes beyond just the Mongolian bus driver.

The endpoint is a Mongolian earth warrior. An American bus driver becomes one. Should we train to utilize individual capabilities for society? However, even if individual capacity is higher, if social influence is not there, it's not enough. I've heard a lot of talk like this. Koreans are smart. In terms of intelligence, Koreans are good at it. But when it comes to people from other countries, they stand out more. However, I heard a story about the economy being stimulated. So, what is the difference that creates a skeptical attitude in terms of social capacity? It's about the bus driver. Even if you have a high level of education, if you can't use two languages, you can't do anything. So, having a report that fits the gathered issues is important. That's right. Therefore, those who cannot tolerate public opinion will not develop further.

People who cannot find discomfort in a sentence are solving discomfort by making others uncomfortable, and finding the ability to solve it even without many tools. This is a problem that makes civilization difficult to develop. If you look closely at it, there may be a difference in the influence of the Earth article. There is a secret hidden there. What is it? Americans, including bus drivers, cannot overcome discomfort. Because the law is the law, Mongol bus drivers solve discomfort, so Mongolians have the ability to endure discomfort. However, when we look at it from a different perspective, Americans are good at handling discomfort. They cannot endure discomfort because they are advanced countries. The problem is, what is it? Everything in civilization, including all objects, is different from inclusion in the system. Civilization is the result of solving discomfort. All civilizations are all civilizations.

Uncomfortable things and the way to solve them. The result of discomfort is putting it at number one. What is the problem of solving discomfort? Who discovers the discomfort and who tries to solve it? This is the maxim. So, in the U.S., if there is no tool for the bus driver, they cannot move and they wait until the tool is made. This nature of waiting to develop tools advances American civilization. If there is no report that fits the discomfort and if it is not recognized as a discomfort or just passed over, it deepens civilization. What is this? The scientific attitude and true kindness are the key to not being able to stick to one's own beliefs. Feeling uncomfortable there at Feeling Bap, not feeling that discomfort, so if you don't feel that discomfort, you can't see the sin that needs to be solved, so it becomes bibimbap in the first-class cabin, whether it's bibimbap or chips, it's all bibimbap.

It seems like 28, so what is the core of resonance? It's something that can't stand discomfort. It's more than this. The core is discovering discomfort. If we use the word comfortably, it looks too ordinary, so we can change the word a bit. What did I write as that? It's not a problem, it's a problem of discovery. Do we discover problems or recover from them? We can't just rush to solve the discovered problem. This is the core that determines the civilization. It's not different from the white rice and kimchi, there's no difference between the military and diplomacy now. Has MSD returned? It hasn't been standardized. This is a lot. People who didn't understand the standard felt uncomfortable. They couldn't understand that. They couldn't find the problem, so they won't be able to solve it. Yes, they couldn't find it. What else is there? The ability to discover this problem in itself.

You need to know that you have extraordinary abilities. Let me give you an example. However, Park Hak-gi decided to solve the problem of hand injury, so he developed a way to carry it. So, he ended up carrying eight things. Then, as the technology advanced, he ended up having a Bangsley. If you look at MP3, what's the most important part? When you look at a mobile phone, how evolved is it? But a mobile phone, and so people confirm a mobile phone and two MP3s. It seems like it's just experiencing a great evolution. However, the discomfort here is that I didn't feel any inconvenience at all. So, people used this excellent machine. However, there was a bad person. Steve Jobs felt it was convenient to have a separate phone and MP3. In other words, while others naturally thought it was convenient, Steve Jobs felt it was inconvenient.

On this side of the great house of Chiwoo, when others say it's uncomfortable to put on a different hat for departure, they feel discomfort within it. So, they think, Maybe I should get off. This is about discovering a problem and feeling discomfort. The ability to perceive discomfort and discover problems is how we can know the high level of skills in a person. Without the ability to discover problems and feel discomfort, it will be difficult. Through experiences, habits, thoughts, familiarity, and reducing the amount of thinking for others, how does it work out in the end? Therefore, this familiarity, experience, habitual thinking, and getting out of the familiar experience through habits create the ability to feel discomfort. If you don't have the ability to discover problems, it won't develop. Whether it's an object or a system, rather than doing it, all the assumed results of this world will not be easily achieved.

Does solving the problem result in replicating and solving the inconvenience? It is the starting point of civilization evolution to expose the inconvenience. Now, we will start studying the classics in a few days. The person who sleeps is the one who lived a long time ago. The classics are for those who live in experience and familiarity. If someone feels simplicity in this world, then they should live peacefully. I don't know that well. If the world is like this, it's not right. Those who discovered the problem, like Jesus, are people who are immersed in sensory experience and familiarity. They are the taste of those who discovered the problem and inconvenience. They were people who were comfortable by the riverside and in the field. They are people who discovered comfort. They went to find the answer. They are the ones who discovered the problem, like Park Joon-bong and Jindal. After realizing the problem, they immerse themselves in solving it. We...

Do you call it dedication when you try to find out what you can give to humanity beyond yourself to bring greater happiness and freedom? We call this altruistic dedication. Therefore, we try to step out of discomfort and problems, feel them, and try to solve them. The spider does not appear as a dedicated public figure in every aspect. Now, we are repenting our daily thoughts towards that person who has reached Pyeong'an and Ik-san with peace. When the sled studies the intestines, what content will come out, what the intestines said, whether it will be correct or wrong, whether it will come out economically or not, is more important than this issue. Discovering and trying to solve the problem is not the core of learning existential anguish and attitude with me. It is not about pulling the problem and trying to solve it. It is about learning the existential anguish and attitude of challenging it. It is not about pulling the problem and trying to solve it. It is about living according to what the intestines said.

Doing things that create another familiarity is nothing on top of it. There is a need to take the time to realize and awaken something harmful or beneficial. It is because it can make us live more firmly and stronger. Thank you.

최진석의 장자 철학 제1강

최진석
서강대학교 철학과 명예교수
사단법인 새말새몸짓 이사장
건명원 초대원장
베이징대학교 대학원 도가철학 박사

저서
‘탁월한 사유의 시선’
‘나는 누구인가’
‘생각하는 힘, 노자 인문학’
‘저것을 버리고 이것을’
‘경계에 흐르다’

"한계를 뛰어넘은 사람들에게는 자신이 마주한 역사 속에서
어떤 소명의식으로, 자신을 어떻게 불태울 것인가
하는 철학적 차원의 각성이 있습니다."