Hamas Attacks on Israel: Disinformation and the Convergence of Hate

Hamas's war crimes against Israeli civilians are undeniable, despite online disinformation campaigns.

### The October 7th Attacks: A Refutation of False Flag Claims
* 🗓️  Various groups, including Islamists, Hamas supporters, white nationalists, and anarchists, share a common trait: **hatred of Zionists**.
* 🤝  The "horseshoe theory" illustrates how extreme ideologies, despite opposing views, converge on certain issues, such as anti-Zionism.
* 💥 Following the October 7th Hamas attacks, which included the **brutal rape of women and murder of children**, claims emerged that the event was a false flag operation orchestrated by Israel.
* 📜  These claims stem from the revelation of a "Hannibal directive," an Israeli military order to eliminate captured soldiers to prevent torture and use as human shields.
* 🪖  However, this argument ignores the overwhelming evidence: Hamas terrorists, some in IDF uniforms, infiltrated Israeli communities and committed war crimes, targeting civilians.
* ⚖️  This act violated international law, which prohibits wearing enemy uniforms and targeting civilians.  The scale of atrocities, including the kidnapping of babies, is undeniable.
* 💔  Even if unintentional Israeli civilian deaths occurred, it doesn't validate the false flag narrative.  The sheer volume of evidence—videos, testimonies, and physical evidence—contradicts these claims.
* 😡  The refusal to acknowledge this evidence demonstrates a pattern of **reality denial** fueled by anti-Semitism, reminiscent of historical blood libels.  The speaker urges viewers to examine the evidence themselves.

Okay, what do Islamists, Hamas supporters, white nationalists, and anarcho-capitalists or anarchists—anti-establishment types—have in common?

Well, apparently they all hate Jews—uh, sorry, Zionists. They all hate Zionists. Um, I'm sure many of you have heard about

the horseshoe theory. Horseshoe theory in political science, uh, traditional political theory describes left and right ideologies as opposing ends of a

spectrum. Each ideology has its own side. Horseshoe theory, on the other hand, uh, describes ideologies as more of a

horseshoe shape where the extremes converge. Usually what we would be talking about is, uh, with respect to how

authoritarian people subscribe to each ideology are, and how in the end they all want to tell you what to do.

Unfortunately, I've come to realize this convergence also applies to hating Jews—uh, sorry, I don't know what's wrong

with me—Zionists. Hating Zionists. They all hate Jews. Um, in the aftermath of October 7th, as the shock of the

brutality of the rape of women, the killing of kids, etc., in Israel by Hamas started falling off of the collective international attention, something interesting, for lack of a better word, started happening. In spite of Hamas taking responsibility

for the attacks, Arabs celebrating them; video footage from the terrorists' own GoPros showing almost everything—well, everything; videos taken by the Nova

partygoers that got massacred; videos from security cameras in the region; admissions of captured Hamas terrorists; all of the above; firsthand

testimonies by raped Israeli women; first-hand testimonies by small Israeli children scarred for life. In spite of all

of this, so-called pro-Palestinian channels, white nationalist channels, and anti-establishment, uh, communities mostly on the left side of the political

spectrum began claiming that it's all fake, a Zionist plot to create an excuse to go into Gaza and kill innocent

Cousins, so let's reality-test this for a couple of minutes. Firstly, the seed, the basis of these claims is in the recent

revelation that a Hannibal directive was given by the Israeli military that day. What's a Hannibal directive? A Hannibal

directive means that in cases of kidnapped Israeli soldiers—IDF fighters—all of them are supposed to try to un-

alive their kidnapped comrades. So they do this in order to avoid them being tortured by Hamas or other organizations,

something that they do; proud of it. They do that and circumvent having them used as human shields or pawns for

negotiations, etc., which is what we're experiencing right now. On October 7th, the claim is that such an order was

given to the helicopter pilots who responded to the Hamas attacks, and they basically were ordered to shoot at all

movement flowing back into Gaza, whether or not they recognized Hamas terrorists or could tell them apart from kidnapped Israelis, from Israeli soldiers, or

civilians that Hamas took from Israel that day. That's the main idea for the—the argument. I'm going to say

that that's true, even though I'm not sure that it is, but I'm just going to go

with it because it doesn't matter at all. It doesn't change the situation; it doesn't have a real bearing on what I'm

about to say. What I'm arguing: the first thing that I'd like you to remember is this: when Hamas entered Israeli

territory, went into cities—let's say invaded civilian communities—they were followed by the so-called uninvolved civilian buildings.

This is a fact. It's also very important to note that not all Hamas terrorists were in uniform of any sort. Some were in

Hamas uniform as attire; some were in IDF—were wearing IDF colors and uniform—and so it was a mix of Hamas in

Their uniform: Hamas in PLO clothes, Hamas in IDF uniforms, and Gazan civilians in plain clothes entered Israel. They

committed all of these atrocious acts. This is a war crime from a legal standpoint, from an international law

standpoint. This is what it is. Maybe I'll delve into it in another video, but international law clearly states that

you're supposed to wear your own distinct uniform when acting officially in any kind of military or paramilitary

activity. You are forbidden from wearing the other side's uniform to such an extent that you're allowed to execute a

prisoner of war on site. Who does that on the battlefield? Whether they gave up their guns or still fight,

doesn't matter. Even if after they gave up, if they're wearing your uniform, disguised as your soldiers, you're

allowed to execute them, and you will not be court-martialed for that. Moreover, and most important, targeting civilians for

the sake of targeting civilians is a war crime and it's in violation of international law. This is not collateral

damage. These people went into civilian communities to attack, kill, kidnap, etc., civilians for being civilians, not

combatants, not fighters—civilians, mothers, kids, grandmas. So now it's clear that even if we accept that the Hannibal directive was

given, there was no way of distinguishing between Hamas and Israeli mothers, kids, teens, elderly people. All of them brutally taken from their beds and homes

into captivity by a side that was and still is in stark violation of international law. They took babies. This

is not a disputed piece of evidence or a statement, even by the staunchest Hamas supporters. They took babies, kids. There

was even a baby born in captivity, and the list of atrocities just keeps going on and mounts up now.

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that the IDF did, in the fog of war, unintentionally kill some Israelis. Does this

prove that this was a false-flag operation? Is this the smoking gun that all groups I mentioned before

desperately want to have against Israel? I don't think so. As I said, the people making these claims latch onto this

incident and ignore the insurmountable mountain of evidence I presented. Not only do they ignore it,

they claim it's all fake. Houses burned from the outside, plus videos taken by Hamas of Hamas terrorists setting fires

to these houses, saying clearly in Arabic, 'Let's burn them out and shoot them. If we don't shoot them, they'll just choke to

death.' That's lies. Those were Hellfire missiles from the IDF. First-hand grape allegations coupled with physical

evidence of [unintelligible] women with stuff shoved into them; fake videos showing gliders flying into the Nova Festival,

shouting 'Allahu Akbar' and smiling as they mow down partygoers; fake burnt bodies of babies; that's AI; videos of

wounded kids in their living room after their father laid on a grenade to save them, as Hamas animals enjoy their time

in those kids' homes as these kids cry and scream for their parents, asking, 'Are they dead? Are they dead?' That's a

deep fake, a deep fake Zionist lie. What about Shireen Abu Akleh's body paraded around Gaza, being spat on by the

so-called uninvolved civilians of Gaza? Crisis actors. It's beyond me to say what brings people to actively deny reality and

truth. Many of my friends and relatives said it's good old anti-Semitism, and this is just another modern version of a blood

libel, just like Europeans claimed Jews needed Christian children's blood for religious Jewish ceremonies. But that may be the case, but it doesn't change any of

The fact is, Hamas and regular everyday civilians from Gaza—the so-called innocent, uninvolved people of Gaza—grabbed Israeli women as a

form of terrorism or act of war. They did it. They also murdered Israeli kids in their beds intentionally. They admit it

and broadcast it to the world with pride. They targeted civilians for the sake of targeting civilians. They still do and

are not ashamed of it. I can stomach anti-alive soldiers or saying Israel is an occupation that deserves to be resisted

by all means, but at least when they literally use all means—like the horrendous, inhumane means that I

mentioned earlier—own up to it. Have the backbone to say you're proud of what they did, like many of Hamas

actually do. Don't take my word for it; look it up. You'll see it all—it's all

online. And after you see the blood and tears, hear the screams with your own ears—sounds that cannot be misunderstood

or misrepresented or faked—images that cannot be conjured up in a studio; real, actual reactions that are only produced

by humans in the most nightmarish, extreme situations. Watch the Arabs laugh at them as they live a nightmare in

reality. Watch these people enjoy themselves at the sight and sound of torture. Bear witness yourself, not

secondhand. Look it up for yourself, and then deny it if you can.

October 7th was an Israeli false flag operation?!

joezo1982

Shared hatred of Zionists among diverse groups

Islamists, Hamas supporters, white nationalists, and anarchists share a common trait: hatred of Zionists.

The horseshoe theory suggests that extreme left and right ideologies converge, particularly in authoritarian tendencies.

This convergence also applies to the hatred of Zionists.

October 7th attacks and subsequent denial campaigns

Despite overwhelming evidence of Hamas's responsibility for the October 7th attacks, various groups claimed it was a Zionist plot.

Pro-Palestinian, white nationalist, and anti-establishment channels spread disinformation about the attacks.

These groups claimed the attacks were fake, designed to justify Israeli actions in Gaza.

Analysis of the Hannibal directive and its implications

The Israeli military's Hannibal directive, aimed at rescuing kidnapped soldiers, is cited as evidence for the false-flag claims.

Hamas fighters infiltrated Israeli territory, often blending in with civilians, committing war crimes.

Targeting civilians is a war crime under international law, regardless of the Hannibal directive.

Even if unintentional Israeli deaths occurred, this doesn't prove a false-flag operation.

Refutation of false-flag claims with evidence

Claims of a false-flag operation ignore overwhelming evidence of Hamas's atrocities.

Videos show Hamas terrorists setting fires to houses and admitting their actions.

The denial of reality and truth is attributed to anti-Semitism.

Hamas's actions, including the kidnapping and murder of Israeli civilians, are undeniable.

Hamas proudly admits to targeting civilians and shows no remorse.

The speaker urges viewers to examine the overwhelming evidence of Hamas's brutality.