Election Integrity and Immigration Impact on Democracy

The election is America's last chance to preserve democracy amidst increasing illegal immigration and political manipulation.

### The Last Chance for Democracy: The Stakes of the Upcoming Election
* 🗳 The current election is viewed as a **critical turning point for preserving democracy in America**, with claims that if Trump does not win, it could be the **last real election**.
* 🔥 There is a belief that the Democrats are actively working to **solidify power by legalizing a vast number of illegal immigrants in swing states**, effectively **eliminating swing states as a concept**.
* 📊 Reports indicate that there have been significant increases in the number of illegals in swing states, with some states experiencing **up to 700% increases**, which could **sway elections in favor of Democrats**.
* 🤔 The White House Correspondents' Dinner is cited as an example where Trump was **heavily roasted**, leading to speculation that such ridicule could **provoke a strong reaction from him**, as he is known for **not backing down from challenges**.
* 💬 The discussion touches on the controversial "**birther**" claims made by Trump regarding Obama, highlighting the **complexities and misinformation** surrounding political narratives.
* 🗣 It is argued that the Democratic Party's strategy involves **turning swing states blue** through various means, including immigration policies that **benefit their electoral base**.
* ⚖ The conversation also critiques the **lack of accountability for actions such as the destruction of evidence by political figures**, suggesting a **double standard in the legal system**.
* 🔍 Ultimately, there is a call to action for voters to engage in the electoral process, emphasizing that the **future of democracy hinges on the outcome of the upcoming election**.

the Jogan experience and uh. It's meant to be you're roasting the president like Trump's just there. He's like actually you know just he's like there as part of the support. And then they turned it around and just started roasting Trump. And he's just sitting there. I'm like he's like yo I just came to the dinner. I wasn't I'm just here to support. You know we know what it was because of right the birther stuff. Oh okay yeah that's what it all was. It was all Trump was at the head of a lot of these people spreading this rumor online that Obama's birth certificate was forged and he's actually from Kenya. What's weird is if you go back to Obama's early days there are some things that say he's from Kenya. Like I think in his something from college said he was from Kenya. But you know that could just be you know people print things wrong all the time. It doesn't mean he's actually from Kenya. But Trump was one of those guys that was

like spreading that supposedly false rumor, pushing it hard. I'm not. This is the kind of thing where I want to just go and look at saying what. What did he actually say? No, he definitely was. He was definitely saying, you know, look, he. I don't think he has the time to go into things like very deeply. Yeah, and so I think he could probably be influenced by a bunch of people like these Marjorie Taylor Green type people who come to him with some wild ass theory. Sure, he might be. And I think there's a lot of that stuff that gets fed to people on purpose so that they'll say incorrect things so that they're easy to dismiss. And I think there's also a lot of people that just make [__] up, and you know, they tell you the Earth is flat, and then a bunch of people watch a YouTube video, and they believe it. Yeah, well, but on that White House correspond to. I was there, and the degree to which they attacked Trump in that, in that White House.

Correspond Center was really, it was so over the top. It was like making everyone uncomfortable, really. It was really over the top, you know. I mean, I think like sort of a passing joke of like, you know, a few passing jokes are fine, but they twisted the knife big on Trump in that. And you could see Trump just getting angrier and angrier and more and more upset. I wonder if, and it's like, man, this is not good karma, you know. That's what I was thinking at the time. I'm look, I was two tables away from Trump, and I'm looking, I'm like, man, this is too much, you know. Well, it's kind of crazy what they made out of that because that's the kind of guy that if you tell him he can't do something, he's going to just keep trying. Like, what, it was a big mistake to rag on him so, so much with that White House Correspondent Center. Well, just look at the way they've attacked

him in ter with just using the legal system like this thing in uh New York where the 34 different felony counts were essentially misdemeanors that there are bookkeeping errors that they decided even though it passed the statute of limitations they decided to try him for these didn't identify a felony abuse of the law is what's going on but most people would have quit most people people up to the een Carol lawsuit and this lawsuit and all the other ones of their the Insurrection thing the Georgia thing all these different things they getting kicked off a Twitter most people would just like this is too much I can't take this but he's so [ __ ] crazy he's like all right come on we're going to war and he just digs his [ __ ] heels in and keeps going yeah it's it's the wrong guy to do that to just do attacking him at the White House Correspondence Dinner most people been humiliated he got angry and he's like yeah all right say I can't be president

I was thinking about running for about 15 years. Finally, I'm going to run. Yeah, yeah, that was a real bad move. Um, but yeah, I mean, I can certainly understand like making some jokes about like, you know, a few sort of passing jokes on Trump, but man, I was there at that dinner, and they ragged on Trump so much. It was insane. The reason why I would push back on that, because I would say there's a bunch of different speakers, right, and Trump would obviously be a target, and if they all attacked him, it's because he's like, if you're gonna make fun of people in the audience, and especially in the zeit, guys, that whole birther thing was big, and most people were dismissing it as being a ridiculous conspiracy theory. So who the [__] is this guy saying this? And so you have 8 to 10 individual speakers that are writing monologues. Of course, they're all going to hit Trump. Yeah, well, anyway, obviously, it was

a mistake. They shouldn't have done that. And, and, but like I like you invite people to watch that the original source material. And uh, I think a few jokes are fine, you know, it's like, but, but it's like he shouldn't be the, like it felt like he was the primary object of the roast. Yeah, which is that's, that's not the whole point of the thing is it's a roast of the president, not a roast the audience. The thing about it is like he's easy to roast. And then on top of that, Obama was like loved and cherished by the left. And most of those people are on the left. There's only so far you can push, you know. You can't ask him about a chef, you know, there like what happened with the chef, bro. You can't like certain things you can't bring up. You want to what's your favorite sport paddle boarding. Yeah, isn't that guy, wasn't that guy a really good swimmer. Tell me what happened, you know exactly. You can't bring that up like if

you're going to roast Hillary. You can't bring up the death count. Like, uh, Hillary, what's the best way to stay in touch? Email. Yeah, it's if you're doing one of those, you know, she destroyed the servers and poured like bleach on the servers. Like, like computers. That's, she poured bleach on them. That's, yeah, that's what I believe. That's like, it wasn't just like they took a hammer to it. They like destroyed the, like, there was no possible way to actually get forensics on the thing. What was in there? That's what I, I mean, what was in there? What was in there? Why would they care so much? That's so crazy. Yeah, the whole thing is there was no, there was no legal action against that, which is clear destruction of evidence. Well, it's also, there's this other narrative that always drives me crazy is that, uh, he's going to destroy democracy. So, so in order to destroy democracy, we have to install a president without a primary. We have to have a candidate that is the least liked.

vice president of all time, the least popular vice president of all time, and then use gaslighting and the full force of the media machine to turn her into the future and hope, and then we're gonna - she's going to be changed even though she's a sitting vice president. And then on top of that, this idea of change when the Democrats have been in control for what, 12 or 16 years, right? Which is crazy, like this is the change. Yeah, I mean, obviously, I view this election as a turning point, like a fork in the road of destiny that is incredibly important. You know, I've not been politically active until this election, and the reason I've been politically active this election is because I think if we don't elect Trump, I think we will lose democracy in this country. We will lose the two-party system, and let me explain why. So, there's only like six or seven swing states. The margin of

victory in those states is small, often like 10 or 20,000 votes. Um, what the Democrat administration has been doing is importing vast numbers of illegals into swing states. Um, you can look at the numbers on the actual government website, meaning you don't take my word for it. You'll just look at the numbers as reported by the government, which is controlled by the Democrats. Um, and what we've seen is triple-digit increases in the number of illegals in every swing state, some cases 700% increases. These are gigantic numbers. Um, so if you have a state that went that has a 10 or 20,000 vote margin and you put 200,000 illegals into that state, you 10x the, you swamp the, it's not a swing state anymore. It's going to vote blue. And then, and once the swing states vote blue, there is no election anymore. There's only a Democrat primary, which is so crazy, and it's so

crazy people are fine with that. Well, I guess people on the left will be fine with that because they think that's a good idea. They just want to win. They just want to win, correct? Like, the thing is, one does not need actually any grand conspiracy theory for this. You just have to look at the simple matter of incentives. If the Democrat Party wants to win, like, basically achieve permanent victory, all they need to do is turn the swing states blue. They have permanent victory, and then we're a one-party state, and then they will keep doing that, obviously. They'll keep stacking the deck by bringing in vast numbers of illegals into the swing states, keep stacking it so that the next election, each successive election, will be worse than the last one, and that's what's happening. If you want to see, like, well, is this actually going to happen? Look at California. California is super majority Dem, 70% Dem. A month ago, they passed a

law making it illegal to show ID in any election in California. So, a friend of mine went to vote in Palo Alto because he was like, Is this for real? He tried to show his ID, and they reacted like if you show a cross to a vampire. Okay, like no, we can't even look at that ID. It's illegal for them to even look at your ID if you want to present it in California. Why? For any election at all, even like city council. What logical reason other than to cheat would you ever have that law? The reason is to cheat. That's the only, only, like you can never make an argument any other way. And I think 84% of people polled believe that you should show ID to vote. So, it's against the will of the people. Yes, and we are extremely rare. We're an outlier in not requiring ID. Basically, almost every country on Earth requires ID to vote. So, the as soon as you make

you ban ID for voting. It makes fraud impossible to prove, 'cause how do you trace the fraud, right? Yeah, it's insane. It's insane. It's insane. And what I'm saying is that how is it legal? What I'm saying is like this election is the last chance to preserve democracy in America. Mark my words. Everything they accuse Trump of, they are guilty of. And if Trump doesn't win, this will be the last real election in America. And we will, if the Kamala, if the big cement Kamala puppet machine wins, they will legalize the illegals in the swing states. There will be no swing states. Every election going forward will be a guaranteed Democrat win, and it'll actually be worse than California. The reason it'll be worse than California is because the one thing that keeps California from being super crazy is that you can move out of California like you and I did. You and I used to be in California, but we moved.

to Texas. We're still in America, but if the Dems win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to turn the swing states, and everywhere will be like California. There will be no escape. That is so insane. This is the final. This is it. This is the last chance. Has anybody tried to want, like, go out and vote? Vote like your life depends on it. Vote like your future depends on it because it does. This is the last chance, man. Is there any argument against this? Has anybody tried to debate this? Has anybody tried to say that this is nonsense, this is a conspiracy? Has anybody made any sort of a rational argument? The left actually, interestingly, does not want to pick up much on this argument because the more attention you look, the more you look at it, the more obviously it is true. Because you just say, like, Well, are the numbers correct? Have there really been this many illegals that have been imported into swing states? Yes, they haven't just walked across the border. They've been flowing in, flowing

in airplanes, yeah, using a shipping app. Yes, yeah, they made an app. Well, the app always existed, but it used to be for people coming over here, like shipping with goods, so they could track you while you're in America, so you could legally be here. They know where you are, and then they changed it to allow that app to schedule illegal aliens to come across the border. Yes, asylum seekers, come on in. Yes, oh, you have an app and fly people in. They're literally being flown in, yeah, to the swing states. And so, the reason that I think the left doesn't want to push back on this is because the more attention they get that this gets, the more people realize it is true. Yeah, it is true. That's why they don't, that's why they're just pretending that they're pretending. I'm not saying anything, but I'm like, yo, they're literally flying vast numbers of illegals who are then beholden to the Democrats. And sometimes I get their rebuttal of people

say like well you know the these um uh illegals are they don't have the same social values as the democra party because they're like more socially conservative. I'm like yeah but that's that's not the point the that if you look at the masa's hierarchy of needs that they're they their primary thing is is staying in the country and getting their friends and family in and then the Democrats give them all these benefits like like tons of benefits more benefits than if you than citizens literally yeah um so so that so you they're beholding to the Democrats for all these benefits um they want to get their friends and family in which the Democrats support and the Republicans don't so they vote them and you can look empirically at California and say like did did they did they vote Republican or Democrat in California. Oh they voted Democrat big time well Reagan Reagan give them amnesty in the 1980s and that changed the the state basically except for Arnold changed the state entirely blue yes and Arnold was an

exception 'cause he was like a socially liberal famous guy. Yeah, and you know, didn't really impose any radical restrictions on any of the people that were going to vote Democrat in the first place. The whole thing is just, it's bizarre to watch play out because it just seems like there's no, this can't be actually what's happening. Did you see my conversation with Fedman about it? Yeah, he was completely in denial about it. I don't think there's that of organization. Like, what are you talking about? Exactly, just like, like, are, because you can, you can break it down. So like, are, are any of these numbers wrong? Because we got these numbers from Homeland, Homeland Security, government.gov. Okay, right. So we got it from the Dogo website. Has the government reported these numbers incorrectly? No, they have not. Those numbers, if anything, are low. So, okay, so they have in fact flown vast numbers of illegals to swing states. Yeah, bypassing the border entirely. And so that is factually true. Then you say like, well, what is

their probable voting pattern um. Oh, okay, overwhelmingly Democrat into swing states um, and oh, and then well, but do the Democrats actually want to FastTrack them for citizenship? Oh um, yes, they do um. There you can see Chuck Schumer on TV saying at a rally this year was saying he wants to FastTrack Le uh and make all 11 mil million or however many. I believe his quote was uh citizens as soon as possible. The goal is to they are FASTT tracking citizenship as quickly as possible so they can they can they. That whether one thinks it's cheating or not, it won't matter because they will be fully able to vote. And for people on the left, this is actually happening. I invite people to rebut this and show me where I am wrong, please do so. No, they can't. They can't. They can't because it's true. Well, what's to me is that there's people that are on the left like people that were Bernie Sanders supporters for ex example screwed with like talk about undermining.

democracy. Bernie should have won the nomination, and they stole it from him and gave it to Hillary. Exactly, exactly. That's what I was going to bring up. Like, they control the primary process. Yeah, exactly. So, like, if you've got a Democratic primary, it's not Democratic. We just saw that. We saw it with Bernie. We saw it with Cala. That, like, a we before Biden, you know, was summarily fired. He was posting that he's in it for the long term. He's going, yeah, yeah, he. He's not giving up. Next thing you know, Sunday afternoon, they're posting on X is that he's resigned from the race, which is. And his staff didn't even know. Like, they're reading it on the X platform that. That. That. Okay. That's how they learned about it. What do you think happened there? How did they do that? They. I mean, because they clear just not. Not in charge, obviously. They could.

have used the 25th Amendment fake president, but they would have to admit that there was a certain period of time where they knew that he was mentally compromised, yes, and so they made this decision to not do that. Well, the weird thing is that the president's supposed to be the boss, right, and yet he's obviously not the boss, right? So, who's running the country? If she's busy campaigning, she's so busy, she can't do anything except Saturday Night Live. She did that, she's so busy, she's constantly campaigning. How could you be paying attention to international relations? Yeah, how could you be paying attention to the economy? How could you be paying attention to any of those things? How do you have the time? You can't. Yeah, I mean, Biden being the president is supposed to be the CEO, the chief guy. He was commander-in-chief, but it just obviously that Biden was not. He was just a puppet, and when the various puppet masters

decided that the papz had, you know, was no longer uh useful. They just tossed out the tossed out the puppet and then got a new puppet with Kamala. I mean, Kamala can't even talk. I mean, that you invited her on your show. I think the most damage that could possibly be done to a campaign is but going in your show and seeing what how what she says in hours two and three. Two and three is when things get spicy. I'm like, oh my God, you can hide for 20 minutes melt. You can hide for 20 minutes exactly. Yeah, I mean, you can just regurgitate talking points for, you know, half an hour, maybe an hour, just where she's just saying like non-seiters. But eventually, she just runs out of even the runs out of non-seers. Well, they wanted to limit it to an hour exactly. That's why. But I was thinking of doing it initially before Trump came here. First of all, when they found out that there was a rumor. I I never had announced that

Trump was coming. What I was going to do is just release it in my the way I like to do things. I don't like to tell anybody who's coming on. It'll get big no matter what. If Trump was on, it would have been huge. I'm like just put it out there. People go crazy. But he apparently or someone from his organiz someone some loose lips and then it got out. And so she contacted my management company and she they her organization her her campaign Camp contacted us and said would Joe havean. I said yes. And they said she wants you to fly to where she is. And she's only willing to do 45 minutes. Only 40. I mean that's that's. And I was like oh don't know. So I thought about doing I'm like maybe maybe I can get a sense maybe I could convince her maybe I could coax her into doing more time. I just wanted to talk to her. I don't give a [ __ ] what we talk about. We talk about

recipes. I don't give a [__] exactly. Talk to you just the things like you just can't, like you can't just output [__] non-sees for three hours, right? Um, so, but for 45 minutes, you could do, uh, maybe for 45 minutes, I could get something out of it. But then when Trump came and did the three hours, I was like, you know what? It has to be like this. This is the only way to be fair. It's got to be like three hours, and it should be in this room because this room is like a history of people actually.

Elon Musk Pleads "Vote Like Your Life Depends on It!" and Speaks on Why He Became Politically Active

JRE Clips

The Controversial Impact of the White House Correspondents' Dinner

The White House Correspondents' Dinner was criticized for its over-the-top jokes at Trump's expense, leading to his visible anger.

The discussion shifted to an app being used to schedule the arrival of illegal immigrants in the U.

, raising concerns about the Democrats' involvement.

The conversation also touched on the controversial primary process within the Democratic Party, highlighting the perceived manipulation of candidates and the lack of transparency in their decision-making.

The Impact of Trump's Presidency and Immigration

The speaker reflects on their long-awaited decision to run for office and discusses the intense criticism Trump received from multiple speakers at a dinner.

They express concern about the influence of conspiracy theories on Trump's beliefs and highlight the importance of voting in the upcoming election to prevent a significant shift in swing states due to immigration.

The speaker argues that the left is hesitant to engage with the argument about illegal immigration, as the numbers and impact are too evident.

The Impact of Immigration and Political Dynamics

The conversation highlights the controversial approach of flying undocumented immigrants to swing states, bypassing the border.

The speaker emphasizes the unusual resilience of a certain political figure in the face of multiple legal challenges and public humiliation.

The discussion also points to the significant influence of undocumented immigrants on the Democratic Party's voter base, ultimately shaping the political landscape in states like California.

The Democrats' Strategy for Citizenship and Voting

The Democrats are aiming to fast-track citizenship for undocumented immigrants, with Chuck Schumer openly advocating for it.

This strategy is seen as a way to gain a permanent victory by turning swing states blue.

The approach has raised concerns about the long-term impact on elections, with California's supermajority as a potential model for the Democrats' future plans.

The speaker discusses the replacement of political figures, specifically Kamala Harris, and her ineffective communication.

They question the true power dynamics in the government, suggesting Biden is not the real decision-maker.

The speaker also highlights the Democratic administration's strategy of importing illegal immigrants into swing states, arguing it skews election outcomes and solidifies Democratic control.

The Impact of Trump's Influence on Elections

Trump's three-hour presence at a roast dinner turned into a focal point for his controversial role in spreading rumors about Obama's birth certificate.

The speaker argues that Trump's actions, such as advocating for no ID required for voting, are designed to make election fraud impossible to trace.

They believe that if Trump doesn't win, it will lead to a guaranteed Democrat victory in future elections, ultimately undermining democracy in America.