Sérgio Sacani: Controversy Surrounding Brazilian Space Agency's Post

Sergião dos Foguetes faces massive cancellation for alleged racism, sparking debates about science, representation, and cancel culture.

### Sérgio Sacani: The Controversy Surrounding the Brazilian Space Agency's Misleading Post
* 🚀 Sérgio Sacani is facing backlash for criticizing the Brazilian Space Agency's post that inaccurately depicted a **black woman as the first woman in space**.
* 👨 Despite being accused of being anti-science and a supporter of Olavo de Carvalho, Sacani argues that the post was **misleading** and congratulates the agency for **deleting it**.
* 👩 The post actually referred to the Artemis program, which aims to send the **first woman and the first black astronaut to the moon**, but the crew for the Artemis 3 mission, which will land on the moon, has not been announced yet.
* 🤝 Sacani has agreed to have a conversation with a black physics student to discuss **representation in the exact sciences**.
* 📰 Leftist commentators, including those from the MBL, have criticized Sacani for his views and associations, such as citing **Thiago Braga as a source**.
* 🧠 Sacani's supporters argue that the criticism of the post does not make him **anti-science** and that attempts to **cancel him** only **alienate more people**.
* 🌐 The controversy highlights the **power of the internet in democratizing information and opinions**, challenging the **traditional gatekeepers of discourse**.

Sergião dos Foguetes, also known as Sérgio Sacani, or should I say the other way around, Sérgio Sacani, aka Sergião Foguetes, is being canceled again, once more. He is being canceled this time for being a damn racist. And this time, man, the cancellation is huge. In fact, I made a video about this cancellation back then. Several influencers, including Jovem Nerd, are going after him. And now, on this channel, just the way you like it, we will show the complete drama. Yeah, I know you like it. I know you do. We will show everything from beginning to end. This video will be educational because it shows how the left operates when they want to cancel someone, right? Go ahead and like the video, subscribe to the channel, and pay attention. Today is the last day. I had never done this before. We had never closed enrollment early before. This is the first time we are doing this. The English course slots have closed. It's over. However, today is the last day to get the remaining slots. Here's the deal: there was a guy who closed the enrollment, but his payment was not accepted. He missed the PIX payment and didn't pay the bank slip. Something happened, and he missed out. He reserved the slot but didn't complete the payment. So, you have this chance today, only today, to get those

People who entered will love it, we already have over 500 ratings with five stars. It took a while, so the link here in the pinned comment is your last chance today. Click there if there are still spots left before you watch this video; otherwise, you might have a leftover spot right when you joined. So until midnight today, you have the chance to grab a leftover spot. Let's see, let's get started with this blast from the Space Agency. This was a joke, right? Here, the Brazilian Special Space Agency, 61 years since the first woman in space, and you clearly see the drawing, a black woman here as an astronaut. I saw the tweet from Shalom Barb, they put a black woman to represent a Soviet, it's a double whammy of nonsense. But the most ridiculous thing is the Brazilian Space Agency, which is true. I don't know what's more ridiculous, this attempt to represent a Soviet woman as black or the Brazilian Space Agency, right? Anyway, my brother, here on Space Today with Sakani aka Gordão Foguetes, or speaking of this, Brazil hates science, especially space science, and I can prove it. Today, June 16, 2024, is a special day for space exploration. Astronaut Valentina Tereshkova, at 61 years old, became the first woman to go to space. Then the Brazilian government decided to do a

Tribute and then he did that portrayed Valentina as being Black. Hello space, right? Brazilian Space Agency, what's going on? Hello government, it's from Brazil, can you explain why they did this? He posts a photo, right? If the woman was white and even had light eyes, as you can see here, you can't reinterpret this. You are being absolutely inaccurate, you are spreading incorrect information. The Black woman does not need this to occupy spaces, she does not need to take the place of other people and try to rewrite history. There are great achievements by Black women that do not need to be demeaned like this. Don't remove this white woman and put a Black woman instead. Anyway, Serjão made this post, then people started canceling him. André Guedes even made a video teasing him, and the prankster himself posted this, it's really good. The best part is that I'm with Pluto, my favorite planet, and both are canceled. Thanks, André Guedes, watch the video, it's excellent. I mean, the guy takes it easy, he takes it as a joke, right? And what were these attacks? I'll show you here, let's go. Victor de Franco knows Serjão. Just read the caption of the post, it's not difficult, buddy. Today, June 16, celebrating the historic space event and all women. Valentina, 61 years ago,

Science and space exploration have always been at the forefront, and today we continue this journey with NASA's Artemis program, which promises to take the first woman and the first black person to the moon. Oh, I see, I see. So, actually, you're talking about the future, not the past. Seriously, man, seriously? The poster reads 61 years of the first woman in space and depicts a black woman. Are you not going to try to speak up? Actually, what we're showing is that those who paved the way will eventually lead the woman there. It's not a representation of the Russian cosmonaut literally. It's not an illustration of the Russian cosmonaut. So, I'm very careful about what ideas I share. If someone thinks it's cool to have similar ideas to Club birulei Brasil for the slow and others alike, that's where the problem lies. Their discourse is aligning too much with people who hate science and lie about the subject matter. Does that mean they've become a Bolsonaro supporter, a Bolsonaro follower, right? The guy saw the obvious. Look at this, it's portraying a woman who isn't black, and sorry, don't come and tell me that's not the case. And now, they become a Bolsonaro supporter. Then the bad guy says the following in response to Space Today, You're stupid. Then Serjão responds in a very polite manner, personal

Playing video games is proof that a Ph.D. is not useful if you are dumb enough not to be able to interpret a simple image that is even captioned, right? And then again, this same attempt at 4D chess, right? The woman in the photo, in the illustration, is not the first woman in space. In fact, the next one will be an older woman. Yes, you don't need to be a genius to understand what's going on in Brazil, to know that these people want to criticize everything. This is a phenomenon that is not exclusively Brazilian. Who doesn't remember... I even made a video about it, about Cleopatra, right? They portrayed Cleopatra as if she were a black woman, and in the documentary itself, one of the women said, If she was black, I don't know, probably not, but for me, she is a black woman. So basically, Humberto Matos, the differences between Castanhari and Sérgio Sacani: the former approached the ideological propaganda of the extreme right, received criticism, thought about it, and distanced himself from the extreme right. The latter approached, received criticism, and decided to fully embrace the fascists. Now he's challenging the magazine Oeste. Hey, man, look, Castanhari actually approached the extreme right and said, No, this is not good, what's really good is to try to say that North Korea is nice

We also made a video about this, even with a guy from... Henrique Tessari, right? Because he's with the three things here, saying the following: criticized the government, like the extreme right. Let's go. Yuon y, the jerk hates science. I can prove it, unfortunately. He contributed to anti-science because he brought thousands of young people closer to science. He was an excellent communicator. But let me explain why it turned into anti-science and put the important things to be saved. To be honest, Saken did a great job, made a great job. Personally, I'm not a fan of the style tactics he uses, considering some things outdated. But in a country where most communicators are self-taught, he did a good job, reaching young people who were not in contact with good communication. So, kudos to another communicator, he or she can express their ideology, take a public stand, without a doubt. I think they can and should. A communicator can direct their content based on the sponsorships and support they receive, if this is transparent and honest, and if it does not involve deliberately producing distorted content that denies evidence. For example, you can take money from a chocolate company, but you cannot produce content saying that chocolate is the best cure for depression. What, in my opinion, a science communicator cannot do is support, partner with, or legitimize groups that are against science and still claim to support science

Ethical limit with all due respect for his work, yes, you can collaborate with any left or right-wing group, including extremists if you like. But as a promoter and citizen, in my view, you cannot condone denialism and fraud or legitimize anti-science. If you criticize scientific and technological institutions, saying they hate science, and at the same time collaborate with and support groups inspired by an anti-science astrologer who published that the election fraud rate was 73%, who disseminated conspiracy theories about climate change, you cease to be a good promoter and become an accomplice to anti-science. I don't understand, man, for Sérgio to have criticized that the illustration was absolutely, I will use an imprecise word that makes him a supporter of Olavo de Carvalho, makes him, before, makes him anti-vaccine, for God's sake, man. This is a tremendous ideological blindness, and these guys pass it on. How can you criticize the government, so you are anti-vaccine, so you are an Olavist? Where did you guys get that from, man? It's a very limited, very dichotomous view of things, right? Supporting those who intentionally use lies to attack science is a little worse than Lula's sarcastic hyperboles about billionaires, who, by the way, were not anti-science, or a post with a Black astronaut. By the way, he probably took it

Tell me, tell me like this, oh, MBL was against this, tell me like this, man, come talk, ah, the Joãozinho that I know from such a city, no, no, I, Kim, Renan, Renato, Amanda, institutionally, the page. Tell me where we were aware, man. My channel. In fact, I am a big fan of science. I studied Chemical Engineering, right, even to bring an argument from authority. When I was in high school, I participated in the Brazilian Chemistry Marathon and got fourth place in the whole of Brazil, my friends. My channel would be about science, can you believe it? My channel would be about science. Let's go. But the MBL at least did not remove the subtitle. The post was ambiguous and poorly done. I agree with Sacani. I couldn't find the original, I think it was removed, but the subtitle was about the Artemis program that promises to take the first, the first woman, and the first black person to the moon. The post was not portraying Valentina as black; it was saying that she paved the way for women and black people. There's nothing unscientific about redoing this, emphasizing this. But there is a lot of science in attacking a Space Agency by distorting the context of the post just because you don't like the government. I doubt he would have considered it unscientific if Musk had posted this.

Fistfights at the university, exchanging punches, what one gives, the other receives, then the other gives. What actually happened there is that one person just took a beating, but the headline says exchanging punches again, you guys go there, put it there. And the first woman's birthday in space, an illustration of a black woman, man. Period. Man, period. It's very direct, the relationship you are causing there. And also, criticizing this, in what way does it make you anti-science, even if you, even if the post was absolutely clear, if it was there. Congratulations to the Artemis program that will take the first black woman, and a poster of a black woman, even if you criticize it in a poor way, that does not make you anti-science. So, Space Today goes there now. I hate science just for that citizen to know. My life is that of a scientist, by what you wrote, you don't know me, and that's normal, judging people without knowing their work, right? It's all within normalcy. Oh, I'll tell you, man, Sérgio Sacani, I really like him, but he and Werson Nunes need to revamp the way they write. Guys, you really need to understand, comma, other things, let's go. And you thought the people from structural racism wouldn't show up. You think, my God, Minister Silvio Almeida

I can try to explain, it is about structural racism, difficulty with text interpretation, and brutal ignorance on your part. Please reread the post by the Brazilian Space Agency, and if you need help, we can draw the attached post mentioned today. He mentioned that today, and he puts the caption, your courage and pioneering spirit paved the way for future generations of women in science and space exploration. Today, we continue this journey with NASA's Artemis program, which promises to take the first woman. So, again, the guy hits on the Scarecrow, right? Oh, sorry, the poster is inaccurate. And then it says that you don't interpret the way the government wants you to interpret or the way you are trying to make a 4D chess game for people to interpret. It's structural racism, my God, man, how horrible. And then, Shalom Barba here again, he responds as follows: structural racism is as scientific as the flat Earth theory, and it's true, man, and it's true, and it's true, let's go. Then, Serginho replies, personal attacks follow, calling me ignorant now. The Brazilian Space Agency admitted the mistake by deleting the post. I've said it before, and I repeat, on the day the Artemis program takes the first black woman to the moon, the post will be valid. Was that the intention? Why didn't you choose the first black woman to go to space

Personal behavior of flat-earthers follows everything within normality, I didn't even know about it. I made the video here and found out together with you that actually, oh, they deleted the post, so there you go. So, man, it's amazing how reality insists on refuting the militancy of these people. And he really said something true. Alright, let's celebrate the first black woman who was a stosa. Why didn't they choose the real one, huh? Why? So, my brother, look at the nice gesture from Sérgio. Oh, a certain Ana Playad wrote the following: Hi, scoundrel, how are you? I am a physics student at USP, a black science communicator. I want to chat about representation in exact sciences and understand how to interpret images like this. As a science communicator, do you want to understand this subject better? Kisses. I'll tell you, she sent a very polite reply, very polite. She probably disagrees with the scoundrel's view, and with our view as well, but she was very polite. I know she will want to engage. So, the scoundrel replied as follows: Hi Ana, how are you? Yes, and you? It will be a pleasure to talk to you. I really admire your work. Let's schedule a chat on 'Endless Science.' How about you DM me later so I can give you my number and

I know this Ana Playad, but two things can happen: either she can go with an open mind to have a chat with Sergião, Sergião with an open mind to have a chat with her, and a super nice conversation may come out, maybe different views. Maybe Sergião doesn't even have an opinion on representativeness, it could be. Or she can come with her militancy fully on, in maximum calibration mode, thinking, I'm going to show everyone that I'm sitting with a proto-fascist, and there you will see that horror show, that person always with that air of morality, like I am morally superior to you, and I came here to teach you. Let's see what will happen; we have to give the benefit of the doubt. I tend to think one thing, but I won't give my opinion before seeing it, so let's see what will happen later. And then, my brother, there's his feud with the guy from Jovem Nerd, you know very well what Jovem Nerd has become. I have also made a video about this here, right? And João Saf went there and said the following: If you at least read the subtitles, you would understand when the Artemis program sends the first black woman to step on the Moon, not in space, because many black women have already been there. Then the information will make sense. The information given was wrong, so they

Brazilian space agency, right, at the top of its Ivory Tower, was attacked by Sergião with huge letters. Oh, it's their fault for having deleted it, it's the same story as the Queermuseum. Do you remember the Queermuseum, that protest from that exhibition, I don't know what, it was the same thing, the M had nothing to do with it. Santander organized the exhibition, people didn't like it, and Santander decided to cancel it. Then they blamed the MBL, which hadn't even mentioned the subject yet. These guys, man, they are always like that, always like that. And I'll tell you more, if it was the scoundrel responsible for deleting the Brazilian agency's information, congratulations, man, he made them open their eyes to an ambiguous image, to say the least, right? Let's go, they deleted it because they saw a nonsense written, simple as that, and that was a great thing, they deserve congratulations. I didn't talk about it at all, and I don't have the reach for that. Congratulations, Space Agency, for having deleted it, and it's true, right? It's true about Artemis, Artemis, right? I think Artemis, when spoken in Portuguese, we tend to stress the last syllable, right? By the way, since we're talking about English courses, you take, for example, sofa in English,

I haven't read and interpreted the text from the Brazilian Space Agency was called ignorant by a person who doesn't read books, so let's clarify a few things. The photos posted here now show the crew of the Artemis 2 mission, which had a woman and a black astronaut. They will not land on the moon; they will orbit the moon and return to Earth. This is the only crew defined so far for NASA's Artemis program. The Artemis 3 mission, scheduled for 2026, has not yet had its crew announced. As soon as this happens, I will bring it to you. Currently, the information we have about the Artemis missions and their crews is from Artemis 2 photos in their releases. What NASA publishes is that the Artemis program aims to land the first woman on the moon, without specifying if she is black or not, and the first black astronaut on the lunar surface. In the initial missions, astronauts with extensive experience should be selected. Again, this is what we have concretely today. Any updates, I will bring here to you. This is not about justifying anything; the main point is to provide information correctly, which no one did during the day. They preferred to insult me instead of doing so. It's true. Congratulations once again for your attitude. Great job, Sergião. You did really well. And facts speak for themselves. So, imagine when they find out that

These moon landing missions will happen on Elon Musk's rockets. The following: it will only happen thanks to Elon Musk. Without him, we wouldn't have a moon landing so soon. It's another thing I didn't know. Take that, leftist, go ahead, insult Musk and celebrate that he will take a woman or a black man to the moon. Take that. Let's go. Ask a question: Did you read the post before sharing it, or did you share it because of the photos? Because it seems like you're trying to justify a mistake with a partial truth. First, it's not a partial truth, and second, it's not a mistake. Let's see what he replied. Yes, I read the post. It is completely wrong, and that's why the Brazilian Space Agency paid for the post. Brazil is part of the Artemis Accords, and they couldn't spread this misinformation about the program. Very good, man. He's just responding with the argument. A lot of leftists are still trying to get some likes, trying to cancel Serjão and even Thiago Braga. Look here, Ferlen Fer, the Endless Science turned into the end of science. A pun, you get it? And there's a rude God of Thiago Braga with an aluminum hat. I just don't understand that little flag behind, man. Like, is it a right-wing alpha male? Is that it, Ferling Fer?

That place is sacred to them and they are funded by MST, PR Cut, and all those folks to mess around there. They tied themselves up in front and did everything, imagine the guys invading SpaceX. But it's simple, turn on the 27 engines and send everything to space immediately, it's tied up. So, buddy, alright, I'll send you to visit your ancestors, bye. And Marcos Paulo negotiating with quilombola law, Cut, PT, I don't know what else. Wait, man, he is stating a fact, if you don't want to, you don't have to. Do you really think that the quilombolas speak for themselves? No, man, here in Brazil, you even have FUNAI, when you talk to indigenous people, neither you nor the indigenous person has the right to be represented by themselves, they have to be represented by a white person from FUNAI. So, in a country that treats its indigenous people like that, how do you think it treats the quilombolas, who are also part of the group of interest, land invaders, people in vulnerable situations used as political pawns? Let's see what else we have here. We know how the YouTube algorithm works, when you type his name in the search on YouTube, it shows up giving interviews, podcasts, parallel conversations from Brasil Paralelo, and also invited the storyteller Thiago Braga, who is not even a researcher, for your Cabal

They stop an interview on the channel Outros Caras. Dude, you are responsible for your own opinion, not for what others spread, right? Ferlin Foc, when someone uses Thiago Braga as a source, you can be sure that he's as shallow as a puddle, a complete idiot. Hahaha, let's go. It's not valid to use serious academic articles; instead of articles by communist authors, use valid academic articles to prove that socialism doesn't work. Okay, I didn't understand, dude. You guys tried to refute a meme that actually has an argument. You may not agree with the meme, but by just mentioning Thiago Braga and attacking the guy, is that it? And you guys who can't interpret text at any time, even saying that Thiago Braga, he is the researcher, he is the owner of the scientific article that will be used as a source. What he says is precisely that Thiago Braga acts in this way; he looks for valid academic articles to prove his theses. It's you guys who are not able to interpret. The other day, I saw a reaction from Humberto Matos. He was saying, Oh, debates are useless. I said, Of course they are useful, and I gave an example of the academic debate by Einstein on the theory of relativity and by Darwin on the theory of evolution. And he said, Oh, look at Arthur comparing himself

Interpreting a text and still wanting to judge the other guy, for God's sake, man, look at what this is. The Fer de No Mano guy wouldn't stop, man. Seriously, he's pointing out one of the most dangerous figures of the extreme right-wing propaganda just because, as he acts like he's innocent, his audience isn't political, and through him, they have access to nefarious figures that he helps promote, even indirectly, like Thiago Braga. So, the guy received a notification here. The context of the photo in question was taken at the 2023 Best Award, where Thiago Braga and Sérgio Sacan Spet Day, among other personalities, shared the stage during the award ceremony for the best influencers in their respective fields of expertise. The guy took a photo of an award, man, let me tell you, I have a photo of an award for digital influencers where I'm on stage with a bunch of people I don't agree with. If I'm not mistaken, Luiza Mel was there, she has a left-wing Economics channel. I can't remember exactly what it was now, man, for God's sake, man, it's so ridiculous, it's so ridiculous. Seriously, stop it. The Christian hatred is so strong in the comments, they exude hatred for a guy, just because he doesn't believe in the same things as them. This hatred is disgusting. Oh, look, even

Let me see, I love Renato, man. Let's go. What is your opinion on this issue of the man having stepped on the moon? You also study and research a lot, right? You surely know something to clarify this story, right? Absolutely a fake news. What do you mean, Serjão? The man did not step on the moon. He would not have the physical conditions to step on the moon because of the Moon. Pause here, just one thing. Renato created a character called Sérgio, a denier. Do you really think Renato used people for what they think they are? Do you think they are making a denier Sérgio, really taking it as a social criticism [__] a sketch, for God's sake. Let's see, because of the moon being a huge LED. For God's sake, LED technology was taken from the moon, right? And the man is not able to step because he would burn his foot, even though it's a cold light, he would burn his foot on that big LED ball. And it's proven. He's saying no, but wait, wait. There is a sense in what he's saying because the moon is really a ball of light, right? It's a LED ball, right? It's a ball of light. What kind of light is this LED light? The moon, everything with L. Really, we only see it from here because the Earth,

This image is already known, I've seen it before, so we can zoom in a little more and we will get to the Nike Jordan sneaker. Wow, a 1998 Nike Jordan sneaker, impossible to be from 1969. This is a doctored image. Jordan wasn't even playing basketball at that time. I'll tell you something, man, these guys are amazing. I love Zinato, I love Sergião dos Foguetes, man. It's no use, you guys will try to cancel the guy, you will try to label him as a fascist, you are only pushing people away from you more and more because normal people don't look at the world like, Oh, this guy criticized the government, he's a fascist, racist, homophobic. So it's good that you try to do that because you are starting to show how cancel culture is harmful and how for many years it was hidden, it was a subtle thing, something all major media outlets did, so you had no alternative but to think differently. Today with the internet, it's different, man, today there is a true democratization of information and opinion. So, my brother, you no longer have the monopoly to say who people can or cannot like. Sergião, a big hug to you, stay strong there. I hope your conversation with the girl there doesn't turn into... I don't think you will do that, but a toll, neither from your

It may really be a nice chat and clarify several things for us, isn't it? A hug. Let's question everything.

🚨 SACANI DA DECLARAÇÃO ABSURDA

Desde que nascemos somos bombardeados por informações de como ver o mundo, como as coisas funcionam e como devemos agir. 
Será que não está na hora de termos mais propriedade no jeito em que escutamos, pensamos e falamos?

Te convido a gastar alguns minutinhos comigo para se informar, questionar e ver o mundo de uma forma muito diferente dessa nuvem de inércia em que vivemos...

Mamaefalei

The Cancellation of Sérgio Sacani and the Controversy Surrounding the Brazilian Space Agency

Sérgio Sacani is facing a major cancellation for making racist comments and being ridiculed by various influencers.

The Brazilian Space Agency is also under fire for portraying a white astronaut as black, sparking outrage and criticism for rewriting history.

Despite the backlash, Sacani is taking the situation lightly and being mocked, while the controversy around the space agency's actions continues to escalate.

NASA's Artemis Program and Controversy Surrounding Science Communication

The Artemis program is aiming to send the first woman and the first black person to the moon.

A debate has arisen regarding a poster depicting a black woman, leading to accusations of aligning with anti-science groups.

The discussion also involves criticism of science communicators and their involvement with controversial ideologies.

The Ethical Responsibility in Promoting Science

It is not ethical to support groups that promote anti-science views, denialism, and fraud, even if the criticism is poorly done.

Criticizing a space agency's post about the first black woman in space does not make someone anti-science.

Personal achievements in science also do not justify supporting anti-science collaborators.

Misinterpretation of a Post by the Brazilian Space Agency

The Brazilian Space Agency's post about the first woman in space was misinterpreted as an act of structural racism.

The post sparked a debate about representation and interpretation in science.

The situation led to a discussion about the potential outcomes of a scheduled conversation between a science communicator and a physics student on the topic of representation in exact sciences.

Confusion and Controversy Surrounding the Brazilian Space Agency

The Brazilian Space Agency was criticized for deleting a post containing misinformation about the NASA Artemis program.

The agency was praised for taking a stand and providing correct information about the program's missions.

The incident sparked a debate, with leftists and supporters of the agency clashing over the actions taken.

The text contains a disjointed and confusing conversation, touching on topics such as indigenous representation, YouTube algorithms, and academic debates.

The speaker expresses frustration with the use of sources and the interpretation of memes.

The conversation lacks coherence and jumps between unrelated subjects.

Confusion Over a Public Figure's Association with Controversial Figures

The public figure is being criticized for indirectly promoting dangerous right-wing figures, causing strong reactions and hatred in the comments.

The controversy stems from a photo taken at an awards ceremony where the figure shared the stage with other influencers.

The discussion also veers into a debate about the moon landing, with one person denying the event and attributing the moon to being a large LED ball.

The image of the 1998 Nike Jordan sneaker is being misrepresented as being from 1969, leading to false claims.

The conversation then shifts to a defense of a public figure against cancel culture, highlighting the impact of the internet on democratizing information and opinion.

The speaker expresses support for the public figure and encourages questioning of everything.