Content Creators vs. Tech Companies: AI Copyright Disputes

Content creators are fighting back against tech companies exploiting their work for AI training without permission.

### Content Creators Fight Back Against AI Companies Over Copyright Infringement
* ✊ Content creators are increasingly pushing back against tech companies that are accused of **using their material without consent** to train AI models.
* ⚖ High-profile lawsuits have been filed by organizations like Getty Images, Universal Music, and The New York Times, claiming their work is **exploited in ways that threaten their livelihoods**.
* 🔍 Investigations have revealed that major tech firms, including Apple and Nvidia, have unlawfully taken content from **tens of thousands of YouTube channels** and **over 180,000 books** for AI training purposes.
* 📜 Tech companies argue that their use of this content falls under **“fair use,”** as the material is **transformed for different purposes**, and supporters claim **inspiration-seeking does not require permission**.
* 🛠 In response, some content creators are adopting innovative strategies, such as tools developed by **University of Chicago scientists** to **disrupt AI scraping processes**.
* 🏛 Legislative efforts like the Copied Act are also underway, aiming to **establish transparency guidelines** to protect content creators from **AI-driven theft**.
* ⚖ The ultimate resolution of these disputes will hinge on judicial interpretations of copyright law, which could determine whether **AI scraping is seen as legitimate learning or an infringement**.
* 😟 If courts favor tech companies, content creators may be left to grapple with what they perceive as an **unfair exploitation of their intellectual property**.

Content creators are striking back against tech companies brazenly harvesting their material to train AI models. Over the past year, numerous news and content providers, including Getty Images, Universal Music, George RR Martin, and The New York Times, have filed lawsuits against AI companies. They allege their work is being used without their permission to train the artificial intelligence that could ultimately put them out of business. The allegations aren’t baseless. A recent investigation by Proof News found that tech companies including Apple, Nvidia, and Anthropic have lifted material from tens of thousands of YouTube channels without permission. Another investigation last year found that more than 180,000 books had been surreptitiously used to train AI applications. Tech giants, however, have argued that harvesting content without permission isn’t illegal or breaching copyright because the material they lift is transformed and ultimately used for a different purpose than originally intended. Their supporters also contend that individuals in search of inspiration don’t need permission from

content creators to listen to a song or look at a painting, so why should AI robots? They also state that given the size of these AI models, any single person's contribution to the AI output is minuscule. Some content providers have taken a more conciliatory approach, but others are taking the fight to AI. Computer scientists at the University of Chicago have recently launched two tools, called Glaze and Nightshade, which can distort or poison digital content in such a way that it disrupts AI training and scraping processes. Meanwhile, a new US Senate bill, the Copied Act, aims to set new transparency guidelines for marking, authenticating, and detecting AI-generated content. Its goal is to protect content creators against what it calls AI-driven theft. Ultimately, tech companies' right to harvest content with impunity will likely depend on judges' interpretation of copyright law. They may deem that AI scraping could be viewed predominantly as learning,

and therefore fall within “fair use.” If that is the case, content creators may just need to accept what they feel is the blatantly unfair use of their material.

Content creators are taking the fight to AI | FT Tech

Interested in unbiased global news and want to make sense of a changing world? The Financial Times YouTube channel showcases the best of our visual journalism, going beyond the headlines to help you navigate the world’s new agenda. Our stories will inform and inspire you to lead the way in business and beyond, to rethink existing political and economic models and follow crucial trends. Join us and gain deeper insight into the news. 

Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2019. FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd. Please do not copy or redistribute FT videos otherwise than in accordance with YouTube's Terms of Service. If you wish to purchase rights to syndicate FT videos, please contact syndication@ft.com.



Financial Times

Tech Companies: The Fight Against AI Material Harvesting

Content creators are suing tech companies for using their work without permission to train AI models.

Investigations have revealed that these companies have lifted material from thousands of sources, including YouTube channels and books.

In response, some content providers are taking action to disrupt AI training, while a new US Senate bill aims to set transparency guidelines and protect creators from AI-driven theft.

Content creators may have to accept the unfair use of their material if it falls within the "fair use" guidelines.

The concept of fair use can be subjective, leading to frustration for creators.

Despite the challenges, fair use remains a legal defense for using copyrighted material.