Navigating AI: Philosophy for Human Flourishing and Freedom

Humanity must prioritize flourishing and autonomy as AI reshapes our existence and decision-making.

### Navigating the Future of AI: A Humanistic Approach to Technology
* 🌍  Humanity is at a crossroads as we confront the implications of **AI on our existence** and the **essence of human life**.
* 🧠  Major scientific advancements, from Copernicus to Einstein, have historically **challenged our understanding of our place in the universe**, and now AI is prompting a **philosophical reevaluation of our role**.
* ⚖️  The potential of AI is immense, particularly in fields like medicine, where it can **enhance our understanding and detection of diseases like cancer**, but it also poses risks of **diminishing human agency**.
* 🔍  Two prevailing philosophies in AI discourse are **existential pessimism**, which advocates for a **pause on AI development** due to perceived risks, and **accelerationism**, which promotes **rapid technological advancement** often at the expense of **human values**.
* ✨  A positive, humanistic vision for AI is needed, focusing on **human flourishing as the ultimate goal**, with AI **serving humanity** rather than the other way around.
* 🧭  To achieve this, we must establish a framework that emphasizes **human autonomy, reason, and decentralization**, ensuring that individuals remain **empowered rather than becoming passive recipients of technology**.
* 🏛️  The creation of the **Human-Centered AI Lab** at Oxford University aims to merge philosophical principles with technological development, fostering a new generation of technologists who prioritize **human values in AI systems**.
* 🚀  By adhering to these guiding principles, we can navigate the challenges of this new era, ensuring that **technology enhances our human potential** rather than undermining it.

- And humanity is setting foot on its shores. Since humans have walked the planet, we've always been the most impressive, intelligent beings. But today, AI is forcing us to ask the question: To live a flourishing human life? Major moments in science and technology shed new light on long-standing philosophical questions. Copernicus dislodged us from our central position in the cosmos. Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution situated us among the animals. And Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity revealed the limits of our senses and our bare intuition. Now, in the age of Turing, technology pushes us to philosophy once again. Philosophy offers not godlike wisdom, but a powerful set of tools of inquiry to move past dogma, past tribalism, and navigate the journey ahead. And the stakes have never been higher. For the past 200,000 years, humans have created technology as tools, as means to our ends. But today, we're creating technology in AI

that has the potential to shape both the means and the ends of human endeavor. The printing press never determined what was printed, but today, 20% of human discretionary time is mediated by algorithms that do determine what information is consumed and even how we decide what's good for us. The upside potential of the technology is staggering. Consider cancer. Today, a doctor can feed medical images to AI, and AI can detect tumors. Tomorrow, AI may even be able to expand our fundamental knowledge of cancer, acting like a human scientist would. And maybe even much better. But what happens when the technology evolves from a tool to an overseer? What happens when it starts to substitute for our most essential human capacities? One risk is that for the sake of incremental convenience, we offload big aspects of our existence to a kind of superintelligent schoolmaster that tells us what to think and what to do. Another is that we create a governance structure to control the technology that ends up doing the same.

How do we realize the benefits of AI while protecting the active use of freedom, that precious gift of modernity, that allows us to realize what makes us essentially human? Today, there are two primary philosophies in the AI field. The first is existential pessimism, or the view that AI poses a dire risk to humanity. This school wants to hit the pause button. But imagine hitting pause before Darwin, before Einstein, or at any point in human history. The losses to humanity would have been incalculably large. In an open society, hitting pause is as impossible as it is unwise. But what is possible, and even likely, is that the quest to optimize the world for safety ends up creating a governance structure that suffocates innovation, harms freedom, and amplifies bad actors. The opposing school, accelerationism, embraces the power of markets and the role of optimism. But some of the leaders of this movement neglect to put the human at the center.

For them, technology shifts from being a means to being the sole end of human life. Some of these individuals want to accelerate towards the moment when humans pass the baton to AI as the next link in the evolutionary chain. Now I understand the appeal of saving humanity from extinction. I understand the appeal of building God, but both of these philosophies are misguided. What we need is a genuinely positive, humanistic vision for the future of AI. Here are three steps to get there - Step one: The North Star. Just like the north star gives you direction, any new AI philosophy needs to be oriented around the goal of human flourishing. Human flourishing here means and applying them to become the person that you aspire to be. We need AI and its governance to serve humans rather than humans serving it. Step two: The Compass. A compass is a tool to help us navigate. To help us make decisions along the way. There are three points on the AI compass. One is human autonomy,

two is reason, and three is decentralization. Human autonomy is the state of being free in our mind and interactions. Aristotle taught that autonomy was essential. Without autonomy, we shift from free agents to passive agents, who are increasingly dependent on algorithms to tell us what to do and how to think. Reason is the superpower we use when our mind considers alternatives in pursuit of the truth. John Stuart Mill fought for the widened access to diverse and competing opinions because he thought it was essential for the pursuit of truth and the cultivation of reason. If AI causes reason to atrophy, humans will slip into dogmatism, intolerance, and persecution. And fields of endeavor that depend on reason, like science, will stall. Decentralization is like having millions of mini captains instead of one big boss at the top. When Alexis de Tocqueville stepped on the shores of America, he saw a nation characterized by the spontaneous association of individuals who, from the bottom up, were rallying together

around common interests. If we lose decentralization, then individuals will succumb to the strong centralizing forces in society. Whether that is majority opinion on social media, state control, or a superintelligent master planner. Step three: Navigating the New World. How do we use the north star and the compass to start navigating this new world? 250 years ago, America's founders came together to build this philosophy to law a pipeline. Today, we need to build a philosophy to code pipeline. We need to bring practitioners together with philosophers to translate these vital concepts of human autonomy, reason, and decentralization into the planetary scale systems shaping our future. To do this, we're helping create the first AI lab in the world dedicated to translating the principles of human flourishing into open source software. It's called the Human-Centered AI Lab at Oxford University. Top technology talent, more than ever before, needs to build systems that are animated by this north star of human flourishing.

But this requires cultivating a new kind of technologist, a technologist that has world-class AI talent on the one hand and also deep capacity for philosophical thought on the other. Then we need to support those individuals who can build provocative new prototypes to show us how AI and human flourishing come together. We're at a pivotal point in human history, taking first steps into the unknown. If we follow the north star, if we use the compass, we can settle on this new continent. We can build a vibrant society from the ground up. And we can ensure that technology amplifies human potential and doesn't diminish it. From Copernicus to Turing, it's time to once again find our place in the cosmos.

3 steps to align AI with the ancient philosophy of human flourishing | Brendan McCord

Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content -- with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields. We aim to help you explore the big ideas and core skills that define knowledge in the 21st century, so you can apply them to the questions and challenges in your own life. Other Frequent contributors include Michio Kaku & Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

Head to bigthink.com for a multitude of articles just as informative and satisfying as our videos. New articles posted daily on a range of intellectual topics. ​Join Big Think+ to gain access to an immense library of content. It features insight from many of the most celebrated and intelligent individuals in the world today.

   - Subscribe for daily videos.
   - Business inquiries and fan suggestions welcome.

Big Think

AI is challenging humanity's central role and raising philosophical questions about its impact on our lives.

The technology's potential is immense, with AI already showing promise in areas like cancer detection and knowledge expansion.

However, there are risks associated with AI evolving from a tool to an overseer, potentially substituting essential human capacities and dictating our thoughts and actions.

The AI field is divided between existential pessimism, which advocates for a pause in AI development, and accelerationism, which embraces market power and optimism.

Both philosophies are criticized for neglecting a human-centered approach and potentially harming innovation and freedom.

A positive, humanistic vision for AI's future is needed, with a focus on human flourishing and autonomy as guiding principles.

The Importance of Human Autonomy, Reason, and Decentralization

Human autonomy is crucial for free thought and interactions, with Aristotle emphasizing its importance.

Reason is our superpower for considering alternatives and pursuing truth, while John Stuart Mill advocated for diverse opinions to cultivate reason.

Decentralization, characterized by individuals rallying together, is essential to resist centralizing forces in society, and the Human-Centered AI Lab at Oxford University aims to translate these principles into open source software for a better future.

There is a need for technologists who possess both world-class AI talent and deep philosophical thought.

Supporting individuals who can create innovative prototypes is crucial for aligning AI with human flourishing.

This pivotal moment in history offers the opportunity to build a vibrant society that amplifies human potential through technology.